A Review of Approaches to Construct Social Discount Rate

Authors

  • Ai-Jiun Chua Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Geoinformation and Real Estate, University Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Weng-Wai Choong Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Geoinformation and Real Estate, University Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v8n4-3.1079

Keywords:

Social discount rate, social time preference, social opportunity cost of capital and shadow price of capital.

Abstract

There is increasing concern on how public projects are being evaluated especially for public projects that bring impacts towards the economic, social and environmental of the nation in the long-term, for example infrastructural, environmental protection, energy efficiency, healthcare, education expenditures and others. Thus, the federal government and state government recommend project assessors to adopt cost-benefit analysis for major infrastructure and social investment as well as for regulatory initiatives. Cost benefit analysis has been widely used as a tool to enable stakeholders to make a better decision for projects by systematically comparing the social costs and benefits with the emphasis on valuing them in monetary term. One of the most significant parameters for cost benefit analysis is the social discount rate. It is a rate that used to convert the future social costs and benefits into present value. However, there is a long-time debate on how to construct appropriate social discount rate. Literature reveals that there are various popular approaches to construct social discount rate, such as Social Time Preference (STP) approach, Social Opportunity Cost of Capital (SOC), and Shadow Price of Capital (SPC). The selection of approaches is a significant process to construct an appropriate social discount rate for the project. In this paper, author examines theoretical for each approach and procedures to construct social discount rate. A framework will be developed to guide the assessor in selecting the approaches to construct social discount rate. This paper intends to review social discount rate construction approaches and the pros and cons of each approach. The paper would provide insight to assessor in selecting the approach in construction social discount rate. 

References

Arrow, K. J. (1999). Inter-Generational Equity and the Rate of Discount in Long-Term Social Investment. Palgrave Macmillan UK: Contemporary economic issues. pp. 89-102.

Azar, S. A. (2009). A Social Discount Rate for the US. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 25, 203-208.

Baumol, W. J. (1968). On the Social Rate of Discount. The American Economic Review, 58(4), 788-802.

Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining A. R., Weimer, D. L. (2006) Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice. (3rd Ed). New Jersey: Pearce Education, Inc.

Boscolo, M., Jeffrey, R. V., and Theodore, P. (1998). Discounting Costs and Benefits in Carbon Sequestration Projects. Harvard Institute for International Development, Harvard University.

Burgess, D. F. and Zerbe, R. O. (2011). Appropriate Discounting for Benefit-Cost Analysis. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2(02), 1-20.

Cline, W. (1992). The Economics of Global Warning. Washington DC: Institute of International Economics.

Cowell, F. and Gardiner, K. (1999). Welfare Weights. STICERD Research Paper No. 20, London School of Economics, London.

Dasgupta, A. K and Pearce, D. W (1972). Cost-Benefit Analysis: Theory and Practice. London: Macmillan

Davidson, M. D. (2006). A Social Discount Rate For Climate Damage To Future Generations Based On Regulatory Law. Climatic Change, 76(1-2), 55-72.

Diamond, P. (1968). Opportunity Cost of Public Investment: Comment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(4), 682-688.

European Commission (2001). Guide to Cost-benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy European Commission.

Evans, D. J. (2004a). The Elevated Status of the Elasticity of Marginal Utility of Consumption. Applied Economic Letters, 11(7), 443-447.

Evans, D. J. (2005). The Elasticity of Marginal Utility of Consumption: Estimates for 20 OECD Countries. Fiscal Studies, 26(2), 197-224.

Evans, D. J. (2006). Social Discount Rates for the European Union. Proceedings of Cost-Benefit Analysis in the EU Conference. October, 2006. Milan, Italy.

Evans, D. J. and Sezer, H. (2004). Social Discount Rates for Six Major Countries. Applied Economics Letters, 11(9), 557-560.

Halicioglu, F. and Karatas, C. (2013). A Social Discount Rate for Turkey. Quality & Quantity, 47(2), 1085-1091.

Harberger, A. 1972. Project Evaluation: Collected Papers. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Harrod. R. (1948). Towards a Dynamics Economics. London: Macmillan.

Harrison, M. (2010). Valuing the Future: The Social Discount Rate in Cost-Benefit Analysis. Canberra: Productivity Commission.

Jenkins, G. P. and Harberger, A. C. (1997). Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Decisions. Boston, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development.

KazlauskienÄ—, V. (2015). Application of Social Discount Rate for Assessment of Public Investment Projects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 461-467.

Kay, J. (1972). Social Discount Rates. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3), 359-378.

Kula, E. (1984). Derivation of Social Time Preference Rates the United States and Canada. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99(4), 873-882.

Kula, E. (1985). An Empirical Investigation on the Social Time Preference Rate for the UK. Environment and Planning, 17(2), 199-212.

Kula, E. (1987). Social Interest Rate for Public Sector Appraisal in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Project Appraisal, 2(3), 169-174.

Kula, E. (2004). Estimation of a Social Rate of Interest for India. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(1), 91-99.

Lopez, H. (2008). The Social Discount Rate: Estimates for Nine Latin American Countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 4639.

Marglin, S. (1963a). The Opportunity Costs of Public Investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 77(2), 274-289.

Marglin, S. (1963b). The Social Rate of Discount and the Optimal Rate of Investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 77(1), 95-111.

Moore, M. A., Boardman, A. E., and Vining, A. R. (2013). More Appropriate Discounting: the Rate of Social Time Preference and the Value of the Social Discount Rate. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 4(01), 1-16.

Moore, M. A., Boardman, A. E., Vining, A. R., Weimer, D. L. and Greenberg, D. H. (2004). “Just Give Me a Number!†Practical Values for the Social Discount Rate. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 23(4), 789-812.

Morrison, E. R. (1998). Judicial Review of Discount Rates used in Regulatory Cost-Benefit Analysis. The University of Chicago Law Review. 65(4), 1333-1369.

OXERA (2002). A Social Time Preference Rate for the Use in Long-term Discounting. Office of Deputy Prime Minister, Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and Department for Transport, London.

Pearce, D. W. and Ulph, D. (1995). A Social Discount Rate for the United Kingdom. Norwich: CSERGE.

Pearce, D., Atkinson, G., and Mourato, S. (2006). Cost-Benefit Analysis And The Environment: Recent Developments. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation And Development.

Pigou, A. (1932). The Economics Welfare. London: Macmillan

Ramsey, F. P. (1928). A Mathematical Theory of Saving. Economic Journal, 38(152), 543-559.

Schad, M. and John, J. (2012). Towards a Social Discount Rate for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies in Germany: An Exploratory Analysis. The European Journal of Health Economics, 13(2), 127-144.

Scott, M. (1977). The Test Rate of Discount and Changes in Base-level Income in the United Kingdom. Economic Journal, 87(346), 219-341.

Scott, M. (1989). A New View of Economic Growth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Sen, A (1961). On Optimizing the Rate of Saving. Economic Journal, 71, 479-496.

Sheluntsova, M. (2009). Evaluation of a Social Discount Rate for the Russian Federation. Proceedings of International Conference on Economics and Administration. 14-15th November, 2009. Romania, University of Bucharest.

Shively, G. and Galopin, M. (2013). An Overview of Benefit-cost Analysis. Assessing Online at http://www. agecon. purdue. Edu /staff /shively /COURSES /AGEC406 /reviews/bca.htm.

Singh, R. (1994). Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment in Irrigation. Economic and Political Weekly. 1210-1217.

Solow, R. (1974). Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources. Review of Economics Studie, 41(5), 29-45.

Stern N. (2006). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2010). Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses. Report 240-R-10-001. Washington DC: Office of the Administrator, USEPA. Assessing Online at http://yosemitel.epa.gov/ee/epa/eed.nsf/pages/guidelines

Young, L. (2002). Determining the Discount Rates for Government Projects. New Zealand Treasury Working Paper 02/21.

Zhuang, J., Liang, Z., Lin, T. and Guzman, F. D. (2007). Theory and Practice in the Choice of Social Discount Rate for Cost-benefit Analysis. A Survey ERD Working Paper No. 94.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-22

How to Cite

Chua, A.-J., & Choong, W.-W. (2016). A Review of Approaches to Construct Social Discount Rate. Sains Humanika, 8(4-3). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v8n4-3.1079