Learning Trigonometry Using GeoGebra Learning Module: Are Under Achiever Pupils Motivated?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-2.1095Keywords:
Under Achiever, trigonometry, GeoGebra, motivationAbstract
Under achiever pupils were found to have low motivation level in learning mathematics. Pupils avoid Trigonometry and consider this topic as tough for them to master. The objective of this research is to measure under achiever motivation level towards Teaching and Learning (T&L) Trigonometry II topic using GeoGebra Learning Module (GLM). This research has used explanatory mixed methods which is survey and interview to answer the research questions. Pupils were exposed to GLM in Trigonometry II topics for a duration of two weeks. Motivation level are measured using questionnaire adapted from Instructional Material Motivational Scale (IMMS). Five pupils then were interviewed by the researcher to gauge pupils motivation towards GLM. Respondents are from 21 under achiever pupils from one intact class in Muar, Johor. Data analysis showed overall pupils’ motivation level are high (M = 4.16, SD = .279). The level of motivation of pupils for each subscale in ascending order is the Confidence (M = 3.92, SD = .268), Relevant (M = 4.07, SD = .357), Attention (M = 4.25, SD = .320), and Satisfaction (M = 4.50, SD = .436). Girls are significantly motivated [t (19) = 2,401, p <0.05, r = 1.07] compared to boys in using GLM. Result from the interviews were found similar to the surveys result. Pupils were found to be attracted to self access learning concept and slider function in the learning process. It is recommended that mathematics teachers should use GeoGebra by developing learning module that combine mathematics dynamic software and written module to help under achiever pupils further improve their motivation in T&L. Â
References
Abu-Obaidah et al. (2012). Teachers ’ ICT Skills and ICT Integration in the Classroom : The Case of Vocational and Technical Teachers in Malaysia. Scientific Research, 3(December), 70–76. doi:10.4236/ce.2012.38b016
Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi, Kamariah Abu Bakar, & Wong, S. L. (2014). Adoption of Wxmaxima Software in the Classroom : Effect on Students ’ Motivation and Learning of Mathematics. Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Science, 8(2), 311–323.
Al-A’ali, M. (2008). A Study of Mathematics Web-Based Learning in Schools. American Journal of Applied Sciences. doi:10.3844/ajassp.2008.1506.1517
Azura Ishak, Zakaria Kasa, Mohd Hasan Selamat, & Bahaman Abu Samah. (2009). Perbandingan Pengajaran Berasaskan Multimedia dan Tradisional ke Atas Pencapaian Matematik dan Sikap Matematik di Kalangan Pelajar Berisiko. Jurnal Teknologi Maklumat & Multimedia, 5, 79–89.
Demir, O. (2012). Students’ Concept Development And Understanding of Sine And Cosine Functions. Universiteit van Amsterdam. Retrieved from http://www.science.uva.nl/onderwijs/thesis/centraal/files/f107257570.pdf
Diković, L. (2009). Applications Geogebra into Teaching Some Topics of Mathematics at The College Level. Computer Science and Information Systems, 6, 191–203. doi:10.2298/CSIS0902191D
Effandi Zakaria, & Lee, L. S. (2012). Teachers ’ Perceptions Toward the Use of GeoGebra in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 8(2), 253–257.
Escuder, A., & M. Furner, J. (2011). The Impact of Geogebra in Math Teacher’s Professional Development. In International Conference on Technologies in Collegiate Mathematics (pp. 76–84). Norfolk, USA: Department of Mathematics and Statistics Old Dominion University.
Furner, J., & Berman, B. (2005). Confidence in Their Ability to Do Mathematics, The Need to Eradicate Math Anxiety so Our Future Students can Succesfully Compete in a High-Tech Globally Competitive World. Dimensions in Mathematics.
GarcÃa, M. del M., & Romero, I. (2009). The Influence of New Technologies on the Evolution of Learning and Attitudes towards Mathematics in Secondary Students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7, 369–395.
Gur, H. (2009). Trigonometry Learning. New Horizon in Education, 57(1), 67–80.
Hutkemri Zulnaidi, & Effandi Zakaria. (2012). The Effect of Using GeoGebra on Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of High School Mathematics Students. Asian Social Science, 8(11). doi:10.5539/ass.v8n11p102
Ignacio, N. G., Nieto, L. J. B., & Barona, E. G. (2006). The affective domain in Mathematics Learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 1, 16–32.
Jaworski, B. (2010). Challenge and Support in Undergraduate Mathematics for Engineers in a Geogebra Medium. MSOR Connections, 10(1).
Kamariah Abu Bakar, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, Wong, S. L., & Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi. (2010). Exploring Secondary School Students’ Motivation Using Technologies in Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4650–4654. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.744
Marzita Puteh, & Rohaidah Masri. (2006). Geometer Sketchpad: Penggunaannya dalam Pembelajaran Matematik Tambahan. Menanggapi Keberkesanan Dan Perubahan, 101–115.
Mislina Atan. (2010). A Study of Students’ Perception Of Mobile Learning In Probability Lessons. Multimedia University Malaysia.
Mohd Zamri Abdullah. (2012). Kesan Penggunaan Perisian Geogebra Ke Atas Motivasi dan Pencapaian Pelajar. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Moore, K. C. (2012). Coherence, Quantitative Reasoning, and the Trigonometry of Students. Quantitative Reasoning and Mathematical Modeling, 75–92. Retrieved from www.uwyo.edu/wisdome/_files/documents/moore.pdf
Nan, C. İ. (2013). Influence of the Constructivist Learning Approach on Students ’ Levels of Learning Trigonometry and on Their Attitudes Towards Mathematics. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(3), 219–232.
Noor Shah Saad, & Sazelli Abdul Ghani. (2010). Teaching Mathematics in Secondary School : Theories and Practices (Cetakan Ke.). Tanjung Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results in Focus. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/pisa
Praveen, S., & Leong, K. E. (2013). Effectiveness of Using Geogebra on Students ’ Understanding in Learning Circles. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1(4), 1–11.
Radakovic, A. & N. (2012). Teaching probability by using geogebra dynamic tool and implemanting critical thinking skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46, 46(Galotti 1989), 4943–4947. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.364
Royati Abdul Saha, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, & Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi. (2010). The Effects of GeoGebra on Mathematics Achievement: Enlightening Coordinate Geometry Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 686–693. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.095
Sherman, M. (2011). An Examination Of The Role Of Technological Tools In Relation To The Cognitive Demand Of Mathematical Tasks In Secondary Classrooms. University of Pittsburgh.
Thompson, P. W. (2008). Conceptual Analysis Of Mathematical Ideas: Some Spadework At The Foundation Of Mathematics Education. In Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 31–49). Retrieved from http://pat-thompson.net/PDFversions/2008ConceptualAnalysis.pdfm
Ting, S. H. (2013). The Use of GeoGebra Software Integrated In Teaching Circle III Topic On Form Four Student. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Weber, K. (2005). Students ’ Understanding of Trigonometric Functions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(3), 91–112.
Weber, K. (2008). Teaching Trigonometric Functions : Lessons Learned from Research. Connecting Research To Teaching, 102(2).
Yusha’u, M. A. (2013). Difficult Topics in Junior Secondary School Mathematics : Practical Aspect of Teaching and Learning Trigonometry. Scientific Journal of Pure and Applied Science, 2, 161–174.
Zengin, Y., Furkan, H., & Kutluca, T. (2012). The Effect of Dynamic Mathematics Software Geogebra on Student Achievement in Teaching of Trigonometry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 183–187. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.038
