Pemahaman Informal Murid Tahun Lima Tentang Perkadaran

Authors

  • Fazura Mohd Noor Jabatan Pendidikan Matematik dan Sains, Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur
  • Sharifah Norul Akmar Syed Zamri Jabatan Pendidikan Matematik dan Sains, Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur
  • Leong Kwan Eu Jabatan Pendidikan Matematik dan Sains, Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-2.1097

Keywords:

Informal understanding, proportional problems, strategies

Abstract

This study aims to identify primary school pupils' informal understanding and solving problems strategies related to proportional. This qualitative study involved Year Five pupils who were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using clinical interview technique can show the pupils' strategies and in-depth justification for each activity is shown. This article presents the analysis of the pupils' responses related to two proportional tasks. Data shows that students used various informal strategies to solve proportional problems. The findings also showed that students who have not learn ratio and proportion topic formally, could show proportional reasoning elements, such as unitizing, partitioning, and changes and quantities. The findings of this study may provide information to mathematics teachers that every student has different informal strategy to solve proportional problems based on their experiences and prior knowledge. Thus teachers need to diversify activities to encourage students' proportional thinking.

References

Ben-Chaim, D., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Benedetto, C., & Miller, J. (1998). Proportional Reasoning Among 7th Grade Students With Different Curricular Experiences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 247-273.

Christou, C., & Philippou, G. (2002). Mapping And Development Of Intuitive Proportional Thinking. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 321-336.

Cramer, K., Post, T., & Currier, S. (1993). Learning and Teaching Ratio and Proportion: Research Implications. Dalam Research Ideas for the Classroom, 159-178. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry And Research Design: Choosing Among The Five Traditions (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

DeCorte, E., Greer, B., & Verschaffel, L. (1996). Mathematics Learning And Teaching. Dalam D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology, 491-549. New York: Macmillan.

Fuson, K. C., & Abrahamson, D. (2005). Understanding Ratio And Proportion As An Example Of The Apprehending Zone And Conceptual-Phase Problem-Solving Models. Dalam J. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook Of Mathematical Cognition, 213–234. New York: Psychology Press.

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston, MA: A & B Publications.

Harel, G., Behr, M., Lesh, R., & Post, T. (1994). Invariance Of Ratio: The Case Of Children’s Anticipatory Scheme Of Constancy Of Taste. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 324–45.

Heller, P. M., Post, T. R., Behr, M., & Lesh, R. (1990). Qualitative And Numerical Reasoning About Fractions And Rates By Seventh- And Eighth-Grade Students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(5), 388-402.

Kaput, J. J., & West, M. M. (1994). Missing-Value Proportional Reasoning Problems: Factors Affecting Informal Reasoning Patterns. Dalam G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The Development Of Multiplicative Reasoning In The Learning Of Mathematics 235-287. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Draf Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah: Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun Empat. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.

Lamon, S. J. (1993). Ratio And Proportion: Connecting Content And Children’s Thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 41–61.

Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational Numbers And Proportional Reasoning: Toward A Theoretical Framework For Research. Dalam F. K.

Lester (Ed.) Second Handbook Of Research On Mathematics Teaching And Learning, 1, 629–668. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Lara Roth, S. M. (2006). Young Children's Beliefs About Arithmetic And Algebra. Tesis Ph.D tidak diterbitkan, Tufts University.

Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional Reasoning. Dalam J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.) Number Concepts And Operations In The Middle Grades (h. 93-118). Reston, VA: Lawrence Erlbaum & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Merriam. S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide To Design And Implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Misailidou, C, & Williams, J. (2003). Diagnostic Assessment Of Children's Proportional Reasoning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 335-368.

National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations For Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-02

How to Cite

Mohd Noor, F., Syed Zamri, S. N. A., & Kwan Eu, L. (2017). Pemahaman Informal Murid Tahun Lima Tentang Perkadaran. Sains Humanika, 9(1-2). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-2.1097