Instructional Scaffolding To Support Ill-Structured Problem Solving: A Review

Authors

  • Diyana Jamari Department of Educational Sciences, Mathematics and Creative Multimedia, Faculty of Education, UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Norasykin Mohd Zaid Department of Educational Sciences, Mathematics and Creative Multimedia, Faculty of Education, UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Zaleha Abdullah Department of Educational Sciences, Mathematics and Creative Multimedia, Faculty of Education, UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Hasnah Mohamed Department of Educational Sciences, Mathematics and Creative Multimedia, Faculty of Education, UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Baharuddin Aris Department of Educational Sciences, Mathematics and Creative Multimedia, Faculty of Education, UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-4.1122

Keywords:

Metacognitive scaffolding, ill-structured problem solving, ill-defined problem, online learning, social media

Abstract

 Provision of an alternative instructional platform has encouraged students’ involvement in online social collaborative learning that could potentially enhance problem-solving (PS) skill. There are many types of scaffoldings proposed by researchers to inculcate this skill; however, concern arises as a result of an ill-defined problem. Besides being complex than a well-defined problem, its uniqueness originates from the integration of domains in a problem and multiple solutions that can be generated out of it. This study aims to identify the dominant type of scaffold used to guide ill-defined PS, to determine the common platform used and the education level where ill-defined PS is mostly studied. The search and review of relevant articles were done through online databases, journals and Google Scholar search engine using keywords of scaffolding problem solving, ill-structured problem, scaffolding ill-defined problem and support in PS. The findings revealed that metacognitive scaffolding (MS) is dominant in supporting ill-structured PS. MS assists in realigning the thinking of an individual to ensure proactive measures taken in the process of PS. Nevertheless, majority of the previous studies of MS were carried out in higher institutions instead of schools and within formal platform e.g., Learning Management System (LMS). Thus it is hoped that this review will give insights for educators to inculcate MS and improve PS skill in schools and through the use of new platform of social media.

References

An, Y.J. (2010). Scaffolding Wiki-Based, Ill-Structured Problem Solving in an Online Environment. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 723–734.

An, Y.J. and Cao, L. (2014). Examining the Effects of Metacognitive Scaffolding on Students' Design Problem Solving and Metacognitive Skills in an Online Environment. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(4), 552-568.

Bixler, B.A. and Land, S.M. (2010). Supporting College Students' Ill-Structured Problem Solving in a Web-Based Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 39(1), 3-15.

Brickell, G. and Herrington, J. (2006). Scaffolding Learners in Authentic, Problem Based E-Learning Environments: The Geography Challenge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 531-547.

Brush, T. and Saye, J.W. (2002). Scaffolding Critical Reasoning About History and Social Issues in Multimedia-Supported Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77–96.

Bulu, S.T. and Pedersen, S. (2010). Scaffolding Middle School Students’ Content Knowledge and Ill-Structured Problem Solving in a Problem-Based Hypermedia Learning Environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(5), 507-529.

Byun, H., Lee, J. and Cerreto, F.A. (2014). Relative Effects of Three Questioning Strategies in Ill-Structured, Small Group Problem Solving. Instructional Science, 42(2), 229–250.

Chen, C.H. (2014). Nurturing Students’ Problem-Solving Skills and Engagement in Computer-Mediated Communications (CMC). Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 25(3), 309-325.

Chen, C.H. and Bradshaw, A.C. (2007). The Effect of Web-Based Question Prompts on scaffolding knowledge Integration and Ill-Structured Problem Solving. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 359-375.

Cho, K.L. and Jonassen, D.H. (2002). The Effects of Argumentation Scaffolds on Argumentation and Problem Solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 5-22.

Davis, M. (2006). Using Procedural Scaffolding to Support Online Learning Experiences. In Proceedings of IEEE International Professional Communication Conference.

Ellis, R.K. (2009). Field Guide to Learning Management Systems. ASTD Learning Circuits.

Evren, A., Bati, K. and Yilmaz, S. (2012). The Effect of Using V-diagrams in Science and Technology laboratory Teaching on Preservice teachers’ Critical Thinking Dispositions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2267-2272.

Farreira, D.J. and Dos Santos, G.L. (2009). Scaffolding Online Discourse in Collaborative Ill-Structured Problem-Solving for Innovation. Informatics in Education, 8(2), 173–190.

Flavell, J.H. (1976). The Nature of Intelligence. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ge, X. (2010). Scaffold Ill-Structured Problem Solving Processes Through Fostering Self-Regulation-A Web-Based Cognitive Support System. In 2010 Cognitive and Metacognitive Educational Systems, AAAI Fall Symposium.

Ge, X. and Land, S.M. (2003). Scaffolding Students’ Problem-Solving Processes in an Ill-Structured Task Using Question Prompts and Peer Interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21-38.

Ge, X., Chen, C.H. and Davis, K.A. (2005). Scaffolding Novice Instructional Designers' Problem-Solving Processes Using Question Prompts in a Web-Based Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 219-248.

Gotwals, A.W. and Songer, N.B. (2013). Using Assessment to Gather Validity Evidence for a Learning Progression on Evidence-Based Explanations with Core Ecological Content. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 597-626.

Hannafin, M., Land, S. and Oliver, K. (1999). Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hardin, L.E. (2003). Problem-solving Concepts and Theories. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 30(3), 226-229.

Hew, K. and Knapczyk, D. (2007). Analysis of Ill-Structured Problem Solving, Mentoring Functions, and Perceptions of Practicum Teachers and Mentors Toward Online Mentoring in a Field-Based Practicum. Instructional Science, 35(1), 1–40.

Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (Eds.). (1997). Scaffolding Student Learning: Instructional Approaches and Issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.

Hutchinson, M. (2015). Netflix, Social Media Trumps Cable for Toronto Students. The Ryersonian: Ryerson School of Journalism.

Johari, S., Nur Hasniza, I. and Dalim, S.F. (2014). Problem Solving: Algorithms and Conceptual and Open-Ended Problems in Chemistry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4955-4963.

Jonassen, D.H. (1997). Instructional Design Models for Well-Structured and Ill-Structured Problem-Solving Learning Outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94.

Kent, M. (2013). Changing the Conversation: Facebook as a Venue for Online Class Discussion in Higher Education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(4), 546–565.

Kirschner, P.A. and Karpinski, A.C. (2010). Facebook® and Academic Performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237-1245.

Koh, K.H., Tan, C. and Ng, P.T. (2012). Creating Thinking Schools Through Authentic Assessment: The Case in Singapore. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(2), 135–149.

Lampe, C., Ellison, N. and Steinfeld, C. (2008). Changes in Use and Perception of Facebook. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 721–730.

Lee, M.J.W. & Delgarno, B. (2012). Dimension of Scaffolding in Technology-Mediated Discovery Learning Environments. In van Aalst, J., Thompson, K., Jacobson, M. J. & Reimann, P. (Eds.). The Future of Learning. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conerence of the Learning Sciences. 2-6 July. Sydney, Australia: 2, 227-231.

Mason, R. (2006). Learning Technologies for Adult Continuing Education. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 121–133.

Mazman, S.G. and Usluel, Y.K. (2010). Modeling Educational Usage of Facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444-453.

McLoughlin, C. (2004). Achieving Excellence In Teaching Through Scaffolding Learner Competence. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Teaching Learning Forum. Perth: Murdoch University. 9-10 February 2004.

Miron, E. and Ravid, G. (2015). Facebook Groups as an Academic Teaching Aid: Case Study and Recommendations for Educators. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 371–384.

Munoz, C. and Towner, T. (2009). Opening Facebook: How to use Facebook in the College Classroom. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, AACE, 2623-2627.

Ng, C.S.L., Cheung, W.S. and Hew, K.F. (2010). Solving Ill-Structured Problems in Asynchronous Online Discussions: Built-In Scaffolds vs. No Scaffolds. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(2), 115–134.

Nurul Farhana, J., & Zaidatun, T. (2015). Metacognitive Scaffolding to Support Students in Learning Authoring System Subject. In Proceedings of Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE 2015) International Conference. 9-12 April. Taipei, Taiwan: IEEE, 87-90.

Oh, S. and Jonassen, D.H. (2007). Scaffolding Online Argumentation During Problem Solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 95-110.

Petrović, N., Petrović, D., Jeremić, V., Milenković, N., & Ćirović, M. (2012). Possible Educational Use of Facebook in Higher Environmental Education. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education, ICICTE2012.

Prensky, M. (2005). Listen to the Natives. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 8–13.

Rafiza, A.R. and Maryam, A.R. (2013). Pembinaan Media Pengajaran Berasaskan Multimedia Di Kalangan Guru ICTL. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 1(2), 20-31.

Reingold, R., Rimor, R., & Kalay, A. (2008). Instructor’s Scaffolding in Support of Student's Metacognition Through a Teacher Education Online Course: A Case Study. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(2), 139–151.

Robinson, J.H. (2015). The Mind in Making.. Worcestershire: Read Books Ltd.

Saikaew, K., Krutkam, W., Pattaramanon, R., Leelathakul, N., Chaipha, K. and Chaosakul, A. (2011). Using Facebook as a Supplementary Tool for Teaching and Learning. In Proceedings of International Conference on eLearning Futures.

Shahizah, S. and Zaidatun, T. (2014). Promoting Critical Thinking Through Asynchronous Online Discussion Forum: The Theoretical Framework. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Education Postgraduates Conference, IEPS2014.

Shatto, B., & Erwin, K. (2016). Moving on From Millennials: Preparing for Generation Z. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(6), 253-254.

Song, Y. (2014). Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) for Seamless Science Inquiry in a Primary School. Computers & Education, 74, 50-60.

Stavredes, T.M. (2011). Effective Online Teaching: Foundations and Strategies for Student Success. San Francisco: JosseyBass.

Wang, R. (2015). LS Vygotsky and Education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 63(1), 112-114.

Way, J., & Rowe, L. (2008). The Role of Scaffolding in the Design of Multimedia Learning Object. In Proceedings of 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education. 6 July – 13 July 13. Mexico.

West, A., Lewis, J. and Currie, P. (2009). Students’ Facebook ‘Friends’: Public and Private Spheres. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(6), 615–627.

Xie, K. and Bradshaw, A.C. (2008). Using Question Prompts to Support Ill-Structured Problem Solving in Online Peer Collaborations. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 148-165.

Zydney, J.M. (2008). Cognitive Tools For Scaffolding Students Defining An Ill-Structured Problem. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(4), 353-385.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-31

How to Cite

Jamari, D., Mohd Zaid, N., Abdullah, Z., Mohamed, H., & Aris, B. (2017). Instructional Scaffolding To Support Ill-Structured Problem Solving: A Review. Sains Humanika, 9(1-4). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-4.1122