The Relationship between Professional Learning Community and Lesson Study: A Case Study in Low Performing Schools in Sabah, Malaysia

Bitty Ansawi, Vincent Pang

Abstract


Education plays an important role in the development of a nation. Teachers, the main implementer of curriculum at school are subjected to numerous approaches and strategies which have been proven to bring about positive and significant change in students’ academic performance. However, the success of these programs depends on the positive perception of these programs. This study aims to identify how lesson study relates to professional learning community practice in the school. A total of 98 teachers selected via purposive sampling from low performing schools in Sabah. Two scales were adapted from past studies to measure the respondents’ perception about professional learning community and lesson study practices. Data from the questionnaire was analyzed with IBM SPSS 23.0. Findings showed that teachers perceived both professional learning community and lesson study practices highly. Lesson study and professional learning community showed significant positive and strong relationship. This study implied that teachers in low performing school are receptive of these practices and such attitude may contribute to the success of the SISC+ program in these schools. Findings from this study help policy makers and practitioners to plan strategically on the implementation of these practices in schools. 


Keywords


Lesson study; SISC+; professional learning community

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, Z. and Ghani, M. F. A. (2013). Professional Learning Community: A Guideline to Improve Education System in Malaysia, Hope Journal of Research, 1(4), 1-26.

Abdullah. Z. and Ghani, M.F.A (2014). Professional Learning Community in Secondary Schools Community in Malaysia. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(3), 227-248.

Abiogu, G. (2014). Philosophy of Education: A Tool for National Development? Open Journal of Philosophy, 4(3), 372-377.

Akter, S., D'Ambra, J. & Ray, P. (2011). Trustworthiness in Health Information Services: An Assessment of a Hierarchical Model with Mediating and Moderating Effects Using Partial Least Squares (PLS). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 100-116.

Andrews, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Transforming Practice from Within: The Power Of The Professional Learning Community. In L. Stoll & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, Depth and Dilemmas (132-147). New York, NY: Open University Press.

Arumugam, T., Khairuddin, I. & Munusamy, K. (2015). Conceptualizing Organizational Learning System Model and Innovativeness. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(3), 155-165.

Barth, R. (1991). Restructuring Schools: Some Questions for Teachers and Principals. Phi Kappan, 73(2), 123-128.

Bhattacharje, J. (2015). Constructivist Approach to Learning – An Effective Approach of Teaching Learning. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies, I(VI), 65-74.

Bethlehem, J. (1999). Cross-Sectional Research. In Research Methodology in the Social, Behavioural and Life Sciences. Adèr, H. J. & Mellenbergh, G. J. (editor) London, England: Sage.

Bourque, L B. (2004). Cross-Sectional Design. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods. Lewis-Beck, M. S., Bryman, A. & Liao, T. F. Thousand Oaks, CA.

Boyd, V., and Hord, S. M. (2012). Schools as Learning Communities. Issues about Change, 4(1), 1- 8.

Chokshi, S., & Fernandez, C. (2004). Challenges to Importing Japanese Lesson Study: Concerns, Misconceptions, and Nuances. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(7), 520-525.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Cooper, C. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2008). Business Research Methods (10 ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Creswell, J. W.( 2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluation Quantitative and Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Donaldson, D. P. (2006). Sustaining Change in Schools: How to Overcome Differences and Focus on Quality. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

DuFour, R. (2004). What is a Professional Learning Community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11.

DuFour, R. and Eaker, R. (1998). Professional Learning Communities at Work: Best Practices for Enhancing Student Achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by Doing: A Handbook for Professional Learning Communities that Work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

DuFour, R., DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2008). Revisiting Professional Learning Communities at Work: New Insights for Improving Schools. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

Edmondson A. & Moingeon, B. (1996). When to Learn How and When to Learn Why. Appropriate Organizational Learning Processes as a Source Of Competitive Advantage. In Moingeon, B. dan Edmondson, A. (eds). Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage, London: Sage.

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: a Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.

Fernandez, M. L. (2005). Exploring “Lesson Study” in Teacher Preparation. in Chick, H. L. & Vincent, J. L. (eds), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 305-312.

Fernandez, C., and Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah, New Jersey Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Fullan, M. (2002). Principals as Leaders in a Culture of Change. Paper prepared for Educational Leadership.

George, D. & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS For Window Step By Step: A Simple Guide and Reference 11.0 Update. 4th Ed. United States of America: Pearson Education Inc.

Good, T.L. & Brophy, J.E. (1994). Looking in Classrooms., New York, NY: HarperCollins College Publishers.

Hall, J. (2008). Cross-Sectional Survey Design. In Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Paul J. Lavrakas, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Harris, A. and Jones. M. (2010). Professional Learning Communities and System Improvement. Improving Schools, 13(2), 172-181.

Herrington, R. (2011). Professional Learning Communities: Perceptions of Teacher Quality and Sustainability. Walden University, Walden.

Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, R. W. (2002). A Knowledge Base for The Teaching Profession: What Would It Look Like and How Can We Get One? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3-15.

Hipp, K. A. and Huffinan, J. B. (2003). Professional Learning Communities: Assessment-Development Effects. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement. Sydney, Australia.

Hord, S.M. (1997). Professional Learning Communities: Communities of Continuous Inquiry and Improvement. Austin, Texas: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

Hord, S. (2004). Professional Learning Communities: An Overview. In S. Hord (ed), Learning Together, Leading Together: Changing Schools Through Professional Learning Communities. New York: Teachers College Press

Hord, S. M. (2009). Professional Learning Communities: Educators Work Together Toward a Shared Purpose – Improved Student Learning. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 40 -44.

Isoda, M. (2007). Where did Lesson Study Begin, and How Far Has It Come? In Isoda, M., Stephens, M., Ohara, Y. & Miyakawa, T. edited (2007). Japanese Lesson Study in Mathematics, Singapore: World Scientific. 5-11.

Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30(3): 607-610.

Kumar, M., Talib, S.A., & Ramayah, T. (2013). Business Research Methods. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

Leithwood, K., & Louis, K.S. (Eds.). (1998). Organizational Learning in Schools. Lisse. The Netherlands: Swetz & Zeitlinger.

Lee, J. F. K. (2008). A Hong Kong Case of Lesson Study - Benefits and Concerns. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1115-1124.

Lewis, C. (2002). Lesson Study: A Handbook for Teacher-Led Instructional Change. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, Inc.

Lewis, C. (2009). What is the Nature of Knowledge Development in Lesson Study? Educational Action Research, 17(1), 95-110.

Lewis, C., and Hurd, J. (2011). Lesson Study Step By Step: How Teacher Learning Communities Improve Instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinneman.

Lewis, C., Perry, R., and Murata, A. (2006). How Should Research Contribute to Instructional Improvement: The Case of Lesson Study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3-14.

Lokman, M. T., Mohd, Nira, H. M. S., Mohd Fazli, A., Narina, A. S., Khadijah, D. and Tasia, H. M. (2013). Examining the Professional Learning Community Practices:An Empirical Comparison from Malaysian Universities Clusters. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97, 105 – 113.

Louis, K.S., Marks, H.M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ Professional Community in Restructuring Schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757–798.

Marshall, M. (2007). Developing and Nurturing Professional Learning Communities: Principles Used By Elementary Administrators. (Unpublished master‘s thesis). Brock University, Toronto, Canada.

Marzano, R. (2003). What Works in Schools: Translating Research into Action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Marzano, R. J., Waters, T. and McNulty, B. A. (2005). School Leadership That Works: From Research To Results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

McLaughlin, M.W., & Talbert, J.E. (2001). Professional Communities and the Work of High School Teaching. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. (2006). Building School Based Teacher Learning Communities. New York, NY: Teacher College Press.

Ministry of Education. (2006). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2006-2010. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education.

Ministry of Education. (2011). Strategic Plan Interim 2011. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education.

Ministry of Education. (2012). Malaysia Education Development Plan. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education.

Ministry of Education. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint Annual Report. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education.

Morrissey, M. S. (2000). Comprehensive School Improvement: Addressing the Challenges. Issues about Change, 9(1)

Mostofo, J. (2013). Using Lesson Study with Pre-service Secondary Mathematics Teachers: Effects on Instruction, Planning, and Efficacy to Teach Mathematics. Doctorate Dissertation, Arizona State University.

Muhammad Faizal, A. G., Norfazira, M. R., Husaina, B. K., Saedah, S., Crow, G. C. and Faisol, E. (2013). Profesional Learning Community through the Islamic Perspective. Jurnal Hadhari, 5(2), 27-52.

Murphy, E. (1997). Characteristics of Constructivist Teaching and Learning. Constructivism: from Philosophy to Practice. http://www.cdli.ca/~elmurphy/emurphy/cle.html.

Myers, C., & Simpson, D. (1998). Re-Creating Schools: Places Where Everyone Learns and Likes It. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Parry, G. (2007). Improving Teacher Effectiveness through Structured Collaboration: A Case Study of a Professional Learning Community. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 31(1), 1-17.

Reichstetter, R. (2006). Defining a Professional Learning Community: A Literature Review. E&R Research Alert Technical Report, No. 06.05.

Roberts, S., and Pruitt, E. (2009). Schools as Professional Learning Communities, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research. A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner Researches (2nd edition.) Blackwell: Oxford.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research Methods. For Business: A Skill Building Approach (5th edition). West. Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Senge, P. (1990). The Leader's New World: Building Learning Retention. Educational Leadership, 47, 84-88.

Sigurðardóttir, A. K. (2010). Professional Learning Community in Relation To School Effectiveness. Scnadinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(5), 395-412.

Spector, J. M., & Davidsen, P. I. (2006). How Can Organizational Learning Be Modeled and Measured? Evaluation and Program Planning, 29(1), 63–69.

Stepanek, J., Appel, G., Leong, M., Mangan, M. T., and Mitchell, M. (2007). Leading Lesson Study: A Practical Guide for Teachers and Facilitators. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Stigler, J. W. & Heibert, J. (1999). The Teaching Gap. New York, NY: The Free Press.

Stoll, L., MacBeath, J., Smith, I., & Robertson, P. (2001). The Change Equation: Capacity for Improvement. In J. MacBeath & P. Mortimore (Eds.), Improve the school effectiveness (169–190). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

Van Sickle, J. A. (2011). Lesson Study’s Impact on Teacher Perception of Efficacy In Teaching. Master Thesis, Faculty of Humboldt State University.

Wells, G. (2001). The Case for Dialogic Inquiry. In G. Wells (Ed.), Action, talk, and text: Learning and teaching through inquiry (171-194). New York: Teachers College Press.

Yendol, D. (2010). Komuniti Pembelajaran Profesional. Buletin SIPartners. Retrieved from http://www.assafii.com/v2/index.php/en/pengurusan-kurikulum/pengurusan-panitia/196-komuniti-pembelajaran-profesional.

Zikmund, W.G., Babin, J., Carr, J. & Griffin, M. (2012). Business Research Methods: with Qualtrics Printed Access Card. Cengage Learning.

Zuraidah Abdullah, Rahimah Ahmad, Muhammad Faizal Ab. Ghani & Hailan Salamun. (2012). Komuniti Pembelajaran Profesional Dalam Kalangan Warga Sekolah Menengah Di Malaysia.IPBL.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-3.1144

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


  
Copyright © 2012 Penerbit UTM Press, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Disclaimer : This website has been updated to the best of our knowledge to be accurate. However, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the usage of any information obtained from this web site.
Best viewed: Mozilla Firefox 4.0 & Google Chrome at 1024 × 768 resolution.