Counselling Practices in Fostering Potentials among Gifted Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-5.1173Keywords:
School counselling, counselling practices, gifted students, performing arts, advocacyAbstract
The role of a school counsellor is inevitably vital in the process of holistically developing students. Counsellors are generally known for initiating career path and guidance apart from engaging students into various academic and co-academic programs to elevate individual potentials. However, little is known pertaining practices in counselling that serves gifted students to its best. Similarly, the existence of a good rapport between school counsellors and gifted students has not shed its light in recent studies. The purpose of this study was to facilitate the concern in providing counselling as to what gifted students’ expectation would be in terms of counsellors’ approaches and support services which are delivered. Findings indicated that counselling services is less favored by gifted students as an impact of relatively lack of knowledge of the particular counselling needs of the gifted students. Thus, there is a need arising to shape counsellors’ awareness in dealing with gifted students on a better platform. Measures to establish students’ confidence in counsellors should also be promoted, considering the need for counsellors to put gifted students in their perspective of professions.
References
Burns R. (2000), Introduction to Research Methods. London: Sage Publications.
Bailey, C. L. (2011). An Examination Of The Relationships Between Ego Development, Dabrowski’s Theory Of Positive Disintegration, And The Behavioural Characteristics Of Gifted Adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(3), 208-222.
Bain, S. K. & Bell, S. M. (2004). Social Self-Concept, Social Attributions, And Peer Relationships In Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Graders Who Are Gifted Compared To High Achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(3), 167-178.
Bain, S. K.; Bliss, S. L.; Choate, S. M. & Sager Brown, K. 2007. Serving Children Who Are Gifted: Perceptions Of Undergraduates Planning To Become Teachers. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(4), 450-478, 535-537.
Bell, C. D. & Roach, P. (2001). A New Problem For Educators: Identification Of The Non-Achieving Gifted Student. Education, 107, 178-181.
Berkowitz, M. W. & Hoppe, M. A. (2009). Character Education And Gifted Children. High Ability Studies, 20(2), 131-142.
Biddick, M. 2009. Cluster Grouping For The Gifted And Talented: It works. APEX, 5(4):78-76. Retrieve from http://www.giftedchildren.org.nz/apex/.
Colangelo, N., & Wood, S. M. (2015). Introduction to the Special Section: Counselling the Gifted Individual. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 131-132.
Crepeau-Hobson, F. & Bianco, M. (2011). Identification Of Gifted Students With Learning Disabilities In A Response-To-Intervention Era. Psychology in the Schools, 48(2), 102- 109.
Freeman, J. (2005) Counselling The Gifted And Talented. Gifted Education International, 19, 245-252.
Gagné, F. (1995). From Giftedness To Talent: A Developmental Model And Its. Roeper Review, 18, 103.
Gagné, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a Developmental Theory. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education. Third Edition, 60-74. Boston: Allen & Bacon.
Gagne, F. & Gagnier, N.(2004). The Socio-Affective And Academic Of Early Entrance To School. Roeper Review, 26, 128-138.
Gross, M. U. M. (1997). How Ability Grouping Turns Big Fish Into Little Fish - Or Does It?: Of Optical Illusions And Optimal Environments. The Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 6(2), 18-30.
Mendaglio, S. & Tillier, W. (2006). Dabrowski’s Theory Of Positive Disintegration And Giftedness: Over Excitability Research Findings. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(1), 68-87.
NAGCM, (2008). What is Giftedness? Retrieved from http://www.nagc.org/WhatisGiftedness.aspx.
NCLB (2001). No Child Left Behind. Retrieved September 30, 2015 from www.isbe.net/nclb.
Nweze, T., & Okolie, U. C. (2014). Effective Guidance and Counselling Programmes in Secondary Schools: Issues and Roles in Students’ Career Decision Making. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 4, 63-68.
Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia. 2013-2025. Bab 7 Struktur Sistem. Retrieved August 16, 2015 from http:www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/ Preliminary-Blueprint-BM.pdf.
Peterson, J. S. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted And Talented Individuals Do Not Have Unique Social And Emotional Needs. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 280-282.
Piechowski, M. (2006). “Mellow Out,†They Say. If I Only Could. Intensities and Sensitivities Of The Young And Bright. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(1), 102-104.
Rimm, S. B. (1997). Underachievement Syndrome: A National Epidemic. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education. Second Edition (pp.416-434). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Versteynen, L. (2005). Issues in The Social And Emotional Adjustment Of The Gifted Children: What Does The Literature Say? New Zealand Journal of Gifted Education. Retrieved from http: //www.giftedchildren.org.nz/apex/v13art04.php.
Vialle, W., Heaven, P. C. L. & Ciarrochi, J. (2007). On being Gifted, But Sad And Misunderstood: Social, Emotional, And Academic Outcomes Of Gifted Students In The Wollongong Youth Study. Educational Research And Education, 13(6), 569-586.
Wood, S. (2010). Best Practices In Counseling The Gifted In Schools: What’s Really Happening. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21(2), 133-145.