Computer Based X-Ray Computed Tomography Training System for Engineering Education

Authors

  • Muhammad Hanif Ramlee Medical Device and Technology Group, Faculty of Biosciences and Medical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Jasmy Yunus Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Biosciences and Medical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Eko Supriyanto IJN-UTM Cardiovascular Centre, Institute of Human Centered Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n3-2.1268

Keywords:

Engineering education, computed tomography, biomedical engineers, radiolographer, computer based

Abstract

X-ray computed tomography (called CT) scanner is a powerful and widely used medical imaging modality in the hospital. The CT machine is very expensive and it can produce dangerous radiation when a person operates the machine. This makes it difficult for biomedical engineers and radiographer students to learn its working principles. In order to overcome this problem, a computer based CT scanner trainer system has been developed. The system is implemented using National Instrument’s Laboratory Virtual Instrumentation Engineering Workbench (LabVIEW). At the beginning, it was started with the studying of existing CT scan machine. After gathering information, development process continued to develop generator component, x-ray tube subsystem, detector subsystem, imaging subsystem, and finally is reconstruction subsystem. The trainer system that has been developed is able to be used to train students on how to use CT scanner especially to get high quality images with lowest possible radiation. This will help biomedical engineers and radiographer students to have a better understanding of CT scanner in term of its working principle and to prevent radiation hazard during the learning process.

References

Bishop, R.B. (2006). Labview 7 Express. Pearson Education, Inc.

Brener, D.J., Hall, E.J., (2007). Computed Tomography: An Increasing Source Of Radiation Exposure. The New England of Journal in Medicine, 2277-2284.

Brenner, D.J., Elliston, C.D., Hall, E.J., Berdon, W.E. (2001), “Estimated Risks Of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer From Pediatric CT†American Journal of Roentgenology, 176, 289-296.

Evan, K.G., Henderson G.L. (2006). Consent: A Guide For Canadian Physicians. Canadian Medical Protective Assocciation

Haaga, J.R. (2001). Radiation Dose Management:Weighing Risk Versus Benefit. American Journal of Roentgenology, 177, 2898-291.

Ho, C.H.J., Wilson, S. (2003). Lego Ct Scanner System. The University of Queensland, 1-66.

Larson, D.B., Rader, S.B., Forman, H.P., Fenton, L.Z. (2007). Informing Parents About Ct Radiation Exposure In Children: It’s Ok To Tell Them. American Journal of Roentgenology, 271-275.

Lee, C.I., Halms, A.H., Monico, E.P., Brink, J., Forman, H.P. (2004). Diagnostic Ct Scans: Assessment Of Patient, Physician, And Radiologist Awareness Of Radiation Dose And Possible Risks. Radiology, 393-398.

Maruyama, T., Yamamoto, H. (2007). Study Of Positioning Techniques For Skull Radiography Using Ct Images. Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, 1.

Otto, M., Allan, S. (2010). Discussing Radiation Risks Associated With Ct Scans With Patients. American Medical Association, 2170-2171.

Paterson, A., Frush, D.P., Donnelly, L.F. (2001). Helical Ct Of The Body : Are Settings Adjusted For Pediatric Patients?. American Journal of Roentgenology, 176, 297-301.

Prasad, S.R., Wittram, C., Shepard, J.A., McLoud, T., Rhea, J. (2002). Standard-Dose And 50%-Reduced-Dose Chest Ct: Comparing The Effect On Image Quality. American Journal of Roentgenology, 179, 461-465.

Prokop, M. (2004). New Challenges In Mdct. European Radiology, 35-45.

Rahman, J. (2000). Labview Applications And Solutions. Prentice Hall, PTR

Ravenel, J.G., Scalzatti, E.M., Huda, W., Garrisi, W. (2001). Radiation Exposure And Image Quality In Chest Ct Examinations. American Journal of Roentgenology, 177, 279-284.

Robb, R. A (1999). Biomedical Imaging, Visualization And Analysis. New York, J. Wiley & Sons.

Rogers, L.F. (2002). Dose Reduction In Ct:How Low Can We Go?. American Journal of Roentgenology, 179, 299.

Slovis, T.L. (2002). Ct And Computed Radiography:The Pictures Are Great, But Is The Radiation Dose Greater Than Required?, American Journal of Roentgenology, 179, 39-41.

Smith-Bindman, R., Lipson, J., Marcus, R. (2009). Radiation Dose Associated With Common Computed Tomography Examinations And The Associated Lifetime Attributable Risk Of Cancer. Archive of Internal Medicine, 2078-2086.

Son, H.K., Lee, S.H., Nam, S., Kim, H.J. (2006). Radiation Dose During Ct Scan With Pet/Ct Clinical Protocal. European Journal of Nuclear Science, 2210-2214.

Spielmann, A.L., Heneghan, J.P., Lee, L.J., Yoshizumi, T., Nelson, R.C. (2002). Decreasing The Radiation Dose For Renal Stone CT. American Journal of Roentgenology, 178,1058-1062.

Terry, P.B. (2007). Informed Consent In Clinical Medicine. Chest, 563-568.

Downloads

Published

2017-07-27

How to Cite

Ramlee, M. H., Yunus, J., & Supriyanto, E. (2017). Computer Based X-Ray Computed Tomography Training System for Engineering Education. Sains Humanika, 9(3-2). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n3-2.1268