A Survey of Professionalism Traits among Education Students in Public University/ Kajian Tinjauan Tret Profesionalisme Mahasiswa Pendidikan Universiti Awam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v15n2.1957Keywords:
professionalism traits, teacher, student, education, public universityAbstract
A survey was conducted to identify the professionalism traits among education students, namely Manner Towards Teacher (AB), Appearance (PN), Oral Communication (KL), Respect (HM), Respect for Time (MM), Digital Communication (KD), Integrity (IG), Gratitude (BS), and Group Work (KK). The items were constructed based on operational definitions from the literature and adapted based on the current context. The first administration (pre) of the Educational Student Professionalism Trait Questionnaire (STPMP) was in the second week, while the second administration (post) was in the thirteenth week of the study session 2021/2022 semester 1. The administrations were done through the Google Form application on 126 students taking Teacher Professionalism Course. Both data sets were analyzed to identify professionalism traits (pre and post), professionalism traits based on gender, the relationship between dimensions, and dominant dimensions that are predictors of professionalism traits. STPMP had undergone a consistency verification process (N = 42) where the Cronbach’s Alpha (r) reliability index is at (.95). The findings of the study showed that the mean score for the professionalism traits of the education students is at a moderately high level, while the mean score for the professionalism traits of male students is higher than female students. Next, (BS) is the highest dimension, while (MM) is the lowest dimension. There is also a significant effect on the professionalism of the student (p <0.05); four dominant dimensions are KK (.185), MM (.158), BS (.149), and AB (.139). IG is the dimension least influencing the professionalism traits of educational students.
References
A.Rahman, K.A. (2012). Disposisi guru berkesan: Personaliti dan kemahiran komunikasi. Akademika 82(2), 37-44.
Ab. Samad. & Jamaluddin, S. (2005). Peranan kepimpinan guru dalam mempengaruhi iklim bilik darjah. Masalah Pendidikan. 117-129.
Abu Hassan, M.A. & Musa, K. (2019). Amalan professionalism guru sekolah rendah di semenanjung Malaysia. 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Management and Leadership (APCEMaL).
Abu Hassan., M.A., & Musa, K. (2020). Tahap professionalism guru sekolah kebangsaan di Semenanjung Malaysia. Management Research Journal. 9(2),37-45.
Alamsyah, M., Ahmad, S. & Harris, H. (2020). Pengaruh Kualifikasi Akademik dan pengalaman mengajar terhadap professionalisme guru. Journal of Education Research. 1(3), 183-187.
American Board of Internal Medicine. (1995). Project Professionalism. Philadelphia, Pa: American Board of Internal Medicine.
Asmawi, Z., & Mohammad, W.M.R.W. (2021). Amalan professionalism guru Bahasa Melayu sekolah kebangsaan dalam aspek nilai. International Journal of Modern Education. 3(8), 196-210.
Berry, B., Gaughtrey. A; & Wieder, A. (2010). Teacher Leadership: Leading the way to effective teaching and learning. Center for Teaching Quality.
Bruno, F.J. (1986). Dictionary of Keywords in Psychology. Routledge and Kegan Paul Inc; USA.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Demirkasimoglu, N. (2010). Defining “Teacher Professionalism” from different perspectives. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 9, 2047-2051.
Ehrler, D.J., Evans, J.G. & McGhee, R.L. (1999). Extending big-five theory into childhood: a preliminary investigation into the relationship between big-five personality trets and behavior problems in children. Psychology in the Schools. 36(6), 451-458.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson College Division.
Hakimi, S., Hejazi, E., & Lavasani, M.G. (2011). The relationship between personality traits and students’ academic achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences. 29, 836-845.
INTAN (1991), Nilai Dan Etika Dalam Perkhidmatan Awam, Kuala Lumpur: Institut Tadbiran Awam Negara (INTAN), 3.
Katzenmeyer, M. & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teacher develop as leaders (3rd Edition). CA: Corwin.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2009). Standard Guru Malaysia 2.0. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Putrajaya.
McLachlan, J.C., Finn, G., & Macnaughton, J. (2009). The Conscientousness Index: A novel tool to explore students’ professionalism. Academic Medicine, 85(5), 559-565
Mutsalim, K., Rohanee, M., Heloh, K. & Jaffary, A. (2020). Tahap profesionalisme guru agam dan keberkesanannya di Maahad Myhammadi Perempuan, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia. International Jounal of Islamic Thought. 17, 78-89.
Nadia Farhana. (2008). Persepsi pentadbir sekolah terhadap kualiti guru pelatih UTM di sekolah sekitar Johor Bahru. (Tesis Sarjana Muda, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru).
Norashikin, A.B., Ramli, B. & Foo, S.F. (2015). Hubungan kepimpinan guru dengan pencapain akademik pelajar. International Journal of Education and Training. 1(2), 1-11.
Nor Hafizoh, I. & Rohana, H. (2012). Nilai professionalism bakal guru berteraskan indicator standard guru Malaysia *SGM). Jurnal Teknologi, 60(1), 31-37.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory: New McGraw-Hill, c1978. 2d ed.
Syed Hassan, S.N., Tamuri., A.H., Othaman, I. & Mamat, M.S. (2009). Kajian Persepsi pelajar terhadap tahap professionalisme guru pendidikan Islam MRSM. Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education. 1(2), 31-50.
Syed Ismail al-Qudsy, S.H., Ab. Rahman, A., & Mohd Zain, M.I. (2009). Pengukuhan nilai dan professionalism di kalangan penjawat awam kea rah efektif governan di Malaysia. Jurnal Syariah. 17(3), 559-592.
Tikok, J. (2018). Sikap dan jantina guru Bahasa melayu sekolah daerah serian terhadap pemilihan bahan bantu mengajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu – JPBM. 8(1). 13-21.
Wan Hamat, W.H.L., Hamzah, M.I. & Abdin Lubis, M.A.L. (2019). Sikap siswa guru semasa belajar di institut Pendidikan guru berasaskan pemikiran Al-Zarnuji. Journal al-Muqaddimah. 7(1), 23-36.
