The Development of Computational Thinking and Mathematics Problem Solving Skills Through Mathematics Modelling Activities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v15n2.1987Keywords:
computational thinking, mathematics modelling activities, mathematics problem solvingAbstract
The latest TIMSS report highlighted that secondary school students from Malaysia did not perform well in this global assessment on mathematics achievement. Some studies have pointed out that students’ mathematics achievement can be improved by equipping them with computational thinking. Therefore, this study examined the development of computational thinking skill and mathematics problem-solving skills via mathematics modelling activities among secondary students in Malaysia. The research instrument used for the assessment of computational thinking was adapted from UK Berbras Challenges and CAS Barefoot Team from United Kingdom. In addition, rubrics for development of mathematics problem solving skill was adapted from Polya problem solving model. This study adopted qualitative approach and the modelling activities were conducted for six weeks. The activities were introduction of modelling, individual modelling task and group modelling task. Data were also collected based on results of computational thinking test and mathematics test. Data from observation and interviews were analyzed, and the scores obtained from both tests were compared and analyzed as well. Based on the findings of the study, it could be concluded that the students progressed at different levels during the development of their computational thinking skill and mathematics problem-solving competency via mathematics modelling activities. These results indicated that mathematics modelling activities can be conducted at schools to improve students’ performance in Mathematics.
References
Asempapa, R., S. (2018). Assessing teachers’ knowledge of mathematics modelling: Results from an initial scale development. Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.26711/007577152790017
Aydin, U., & Ubuz, B. (2014). Predicting undergraduate students' mathematics thinking about derivative concept: A multilevel analysis of personal and institutional factors. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.023
Banks, F., & Barlex, D., M. (2014). Beyond the subject silos in STEM–the case for ‘looking sideways' in the secondary school curriculum.
Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?. Acm Inroads, 2(1), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Kinnebrew, J., S. (2017). Learner modeling for adaptive scaffolding in a computational thinking-based science learning environment. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 27(1), 5-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-017-9187-0
Blum, W., & Leiß, D. (2007). Deal with modelling problems. Mathematics modelling: Education, engineering and economics-ICTMA, 12, 222.
Boaler, J. (2002). Learning from teaching: Exploring the relationship between reform curriculum and equity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(4), 239-258. https://doi.org/10.2307/749740
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012, April). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American educational research association, Vancouver, Canada1,.
Burkhardt, H. (2006). Modelling in mathematics classrooms: reflections on past developments and the future. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(2), 178-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655888
Buteau, C., Gadanidis, G., Lovric, M., & Mueller, E. (2017). Computational thinking and mathematics curriculum. In S. Osterle, D. Allan, & J. Holm (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group Conference ,119-136. Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Carreira, S. & Baioa, A., M. (2018) Mathematical modelling with hands-on experimental tasks: on the student’s sense of credibility. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 50, 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0905-1
CAS Barefoot Team. (2014). What is Computational Thinking. UK: Crown.
Clement, J. (2000). Model based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1041-1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416901
Dewolf, T., Van Dooren, W., Ev Cimen, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2014). The impact of illustrations and warnings on solving mathematics word problems realistically. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.745468
English, L., & Lesh, R. (2003). Ends-in-view problems. Beyond Constructivism, 297-316.
Fields, D., A., Lui, D., & Kafai, Y., B. (2019). Teaching computational thinking with electronic textiles: Modeling iterative practices and supporting personal projects in exploring computer science. In Computational thinking education (pp. 279-294). Springer, Singapore.
Gainsburg, J. (2008). Real-world connections in secondary mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(3), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9070-8
Gadanidis, G. (2017). Five affordances of computational thinking to support elementary mathematics education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 36(2), 143-151. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/174346/
Greefrath, G. (2015). Problem solving methods for mathematics modelling. In G. Stillman,W. Blum, M. S. Biembengut (Eds.), Mathematics modelling in education research and practice. Cultural, social and cognitive influences ICTMA 16,173–183. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
Jablonka, E. (2007) The relevance of modelling and applications: relevant to whom and for what purposes? Modelling and Applications in Mathematics Education (W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. W. Henn & M. Niss eds). New York: Springer, 193–200
Kaiser, G., & Schwarz, B. (2006). Mathematics modelling as bridge between school and university. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(2), 196-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655889
Kaur, B. Dindyal, J. (2010), Mathematics Applications and Modelling, National Institute of Education, Singapore
Korkmaz, Ö., Çakir, R., & Özden, M., Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Computers in human behavior, 72, 558-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005
Mishra, P., Cain, W., Sawaya, S., & Henriksen, D. (2013). Rethinking Technology & Creativity in the 21st Century: A Room of Their Own. TechTrends, 57(4), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0668-7
Mullis, I., V., S., Martin, M., O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College
Nagappan, R. (2001). Language teaching and the enhancement of higher-order thinking skills. Anthology series-SEAMEO regional language centre, 190-223.
Ottesen, J. (2001). Do not ask what mathematics can do for modelling. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at the university level. An ICMI study (pp. 335 -346). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Papadopoulos, Y., & Tegos, S. (2012, October). Using microworlds to introduce programming to novices. In 2012 16th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics (pp. 180-185). IEEE.
PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment). (2006) Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematics Literacy. A Framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD.
Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J., C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in human behavior, 72, 678-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
Sanford, J., F., & Naidu, J., T. (2016). Computational thinking concepts for grade school. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 9(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v9i1.9547
Sarıtepeci, M., & Durak, H. (2017). Analyzing the effect of block and robotic coding activities on computational thinking in programming education. In G. D. Irina Koleva (Ed.), Educational research and practice. St. Kliment Ohridski University Press.
Smith, C., & Morgan, C. (2016). Curricular orientations to real-world contexts in mathematics. The Curriculum Journal, 27(1), 24-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2016.1139498
Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5
Yeap, B., H., & Kaur, B. (2008). Elementary school students engaging in making generalisation: A glimpse from a Singapore classroom. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 40(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0072-x
