Research on Online Assessment among Vocational College Teachers in Johor Bahru/ Penelitian Keatas Pentaksiran Dalam Talian Oleh Guru Kolej Vokasional Daerah Johor Bahru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v14n3-2.2013Keywords:
Online assessment, Online learningAbstract
Online assessment requires a thorough implementation to avoid inaccurate choice of assessment and low quality type of assessment. The purpose of this study is to identify the online assessment conducted by vocational college teachers in Johor Bahru based on the online assessment design framework developed by Robin Booth. There are four stages in designing assessments for online learning, which are planning, development, implementation and support, as well as evaluator reviews. The respondents of the study consisted of 173 vocational college teachers for all subjects or programs in the Johor Bahru. A set of questionnaire was developed based on the criteria in four stages of designing online assessment. The questionnaire was filled out by the teachers involved through Google Form that have been distributed. Based on the pilot study conducted, the Cronbach’s Alpha index overall was 0.930. While the Alpha Cronbach index for each level is 0.788 for the planning stage, 0.764 for the development stage, 0.772 for the implementation stage and 0.835 for the support and review stage. Data were analyzed using the ‘Statistical Package for Social Science’ (SPSS) to obtain the median, interquartile range (IQR), frequency and percentage. The findings of the study show that the online assessment developed by Johor Bahru vocational college teachers was conducted according to each stage of the framework used in this study with Median=4. Most teachers agree that they have developed an online assessment according to the online assessment design framework.
References
Baleni, Zweli. (2015). Online Formative Assessment In Higher Education: Its Pros and Cons. Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 13, 228-236.
Booth, R. (2003). The Development Of Quality Online Assessment In Vocational Education And Training. Australia: Ncver.
Cooper, V., & Tschobotko, A. (2020). COVID-19 - higher education and student related challenges. Bevan Brittan LLP.
Cresswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting And Evaluating Quantitative And Qualitative Research. University of Nebraska Lincoln: Pearson.
Perera-Diltz, D., & Moe, J. (2014). Formative and Summative Assessment In Online Education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 7(1), 130-142.
Duijnhouwer, H., Prins, F. J., Stokking, K. M. (2012).Feedback providing improvement strategies and reflection on feedback use: Effects on students’ writing motivation, process, and performance. Learning and Instruction, 22(3), 171-184.
Doucet, A., Netolicky, D., Timmers, K., et al. (2020). Thinking about pedagogy in an unfolding pandemic: An independent report on approaches to distance learning during COVID19 school closures to inform Education International and UNESCO. Education International.
Goldstein, J. &. (2012). Can Assessment Drive Instruction? Understanding The Impact Of One State's Alternate Assessment. Research & Practice For Persons With Severe Disabilities, 199-209
Hew, K. W. (2010). Student Contribution In Asynchronous Online Discussion: A Review Of The Research And Empirical Exploration. Instructional Science, 571-606
Kanji, R. B. (2014). Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah Di Sekolah Menengah Daerah Segamat. Masters thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Education. Available from http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/78001/. (ID No. 78001). Tarikh akses: 1 July 2021.
KPM, (2020). Manual Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Di Rumah. Diambil dari https://www.moe.gov.my/muat-turun/lain-lain/manual-pdp-di-rumah/3727-manual-pdpdr/file. Tarikh akses: 20 September 2021.
Krejcie, R. V. (1970). Determining Sample Size For Research Activities. Educational And Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.
Mumba, Brian, Reliability and Validity Issues in Computer-Enhanced Online Assessment Methods. Diambil dari SSRN: https://sci hub.st/https://ssrn.com/abstract=3365230. Tarikh akses: 2 Jun 2021.
Openo, D. C. (2018). Assessment Strategies For Online Learning Engagement And Authenticity. Au Press, Athabasca University.
Perera-Diltz, D. &. (2014). Formative And Summative Assessment In Online Education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 7(1), , 130-142.
Ab Rahman, A., Hanafi, N. M., Yusof, A. M., & Awang, H. (2019). Analisis Kefungsian Skala Bagi Pembinaan Rubrik Pentaksiran Kompetensi Amali. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 4(2), 120-126.
Reimers, F. M. (2021). Pendidikan dan COVID-19: pemulihan daripada kejutan oleh pandemik dan membina semula dengan lebih baik. Diambil dari www.unesco.org: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378626_may.locale=en. Tarikh akses: 5 Jun 2021.
Tilghman, S. B. (2011). Designing And Developing Online Course Assessments. Review Of Higher Education And Self-Learning, 31-34.
Victor J. Callan, M. A. (2016). E-Assessment: Challenges To The Legitimacy Of Vet Practitioners And Auditors. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 68(4), 416-435.
Vonderwell, S.K., Boboc, M. Promoting Formative Assessment in Online Teaching and Learning. Techtrends Tech Trends 57, 22–27. Diambil dari https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0673-x. Tarikh akses: 15 Feb 2021.
Zainun, Z., Razalli, A. R., & Saad, K. M. (2020, July). The Use of CIPP Model in Carrying Out The Teaching of Specific Vocational Skills Among Special Needs Students With Average Ability. In International Conference on Special Education In South East Asia Region 10th Series 2020. Redwhite Press.
