Kesan Motivasi dan Strategi Pembelajaran Terhadap Pencapaian Akademik dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v2n1.376Keywords:
Motivational aspects of value, learning strategies, direct effects, indirect effectsAbstract
The writing is aimed to study the effects of motivation and learning strategies on academic achievement in science subjects. Motivation in value aspects consist of mastery goal, ego-approach goal, ego-avoidance goal and work avoidance goal. While learning strategies include cognitive strategies and metacognitive strategies.Academic achievement of students in this study is measured by final examination results of science. By using stratified random sampling based on gender, a total of 434 students from form 4 arts stream students enrolled in 10 rural schools in the district of Batu Pahat were chosen to answer the questionnaire. The results showed that motivation contributed insignificant direct effect on academic achievement with value of 7.6% (β = - 0.114, p <0.113); while learning strategies contributed a significant direct effect on academic achievement with value of 6.8% (β = 0.278, p <0.000). Motivation is also found contributed significant indirect effect with value of 43.84% on academic achievement through learning strategies of the total effect.
References
Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and Strategy Use in Science: Individual Differences and Classroom Effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 811–831.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social Theory: Aagentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
Elliot, A. J., & Church, A. J. (1997). A Hierarchical Model of Approach and Avoidance Achievement Motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.
Elliot, A. J., & Covington, M. C. (2001). Approach and Avoidance Motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 2.
Elliot, A. J., &Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and Avoidance Achievement Goal and Intrinsic Motivation: A Mediation Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 968–980.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (1998). Test Anxiety and Hierarchical Model Approach and Avoidance Achievement Motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 628–644.
Gardner, Howard. (2000). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic.
Gardner, Howard. (1993). Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. New York: Basic.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Carter, S. M., Letho, & Elliot, A. J. (1997). Predictors and Consequences of Achievement Goals in the College Classroom: Maintaining Interest and Making The Grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1248–1295.
Meece, J. L. (2002). Child and Adolescent Development for Educator. 2nded. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and Self-regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective on Issues in Motivation Terminology, Theory, and Research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). Multiple Goals, Multiple Pathways:The Role of Goal Orientation in Learning and Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000c). The Role of Goal Orientation in Self Regulated Learning. In M.Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation: Theory,Research and Applications. (pp. 451–502). San Diego,CA: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R., &Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research and Applications. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle, NJ: Printice-Hall, Inc.
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Aplikasi Teori Kecerdasan Pelbagai Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a Context of Early Adolesents’ Academic and Socoal-emotional Development: A Summary of Research Findings. Elementary Schools Journal, 100, 433–471.
Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perceptions of the School Psychological Environment and Early Adolescent’ Behavioral Functioning in School: The Mediating Roles of Goals and Belonging. Journal of Educatonal Psychology, 88, 408–422.
Tuckman, B. W. (1999). Motivational Factors Affecting Student Achievement-current Perspectives. Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.
Tuckman, B. W. (2000). Using Frequent Testing to Increase Students’ Motivation to Achieve. The OhioState University, The Walter E. Dennis Learning Center. Retrieved February 17, 2005 fromhttp://dennislearningcenter.osu.edu/belgium-paper/BWT-belgium-paper.htm.
Tuckman, B. W. (2003). The strategies-for-achievement approach for teaching study skills. Paper presented at the Symposium, Applying Psychological Principles to Teaching Self-Regulation and LearningStrategies. Retrieved February 17, 2005 from http://dennislearningcenter.osu.edu/references/stACH%20paper-APA'031.htm.
Tuckman, B.W. (2001). The Procrastinators' Support Center.The Ohio State University, The Walter E .Dennis Learning Center. Retrieved February 16, 2005 from http://dennislearningcenter.osu.edu/dontdelay/index.htm.
Wan Mohd Zahid Wan Mohd Noordin. (1994). Wawasan Pendidikan Agenda Pengisian. Kuala Lumpur: Cahaya Pantai Publishing (M) Sdn. Bhd.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. M. (1996). Development of Structured Interview for Assessing Student Use of Self-regulated Learning Strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. M. (1996). Development of Structured Interview for Assessing Student Use of Self-regulated Learning Strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628.
