Hubungan antara Trait Personaliti dengan Tingkah Laku Kepimpinan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v2n1.383Keywords:
Personality traits, transformational leadership, school leadersAbstract
The main objective of this cross-sectional study is to determine the inter relationship of personality trait (Conscientiousness, Openness to experience, Extraversion, Agreeableness) and transformational leadership among school educator leaders in High Performance Schools (SBT). Two sets of questionnaire to measure leadership behavior and personality trait were administered to 306 (89%) (132 = male; 174 = female) and subjects who were selected by stratified random sampling in 15 SBT schools in Malaysia. Data were analyzed through inferential statistics such as correlation. The finding of the bivariate analysis using the Pearson correlation method indicates that the personality trait such as Conscientiousness (r=. 448, p<0.01), Openness to experience (r=. 605, p<0.01), Extraversion (r=.410, p<0.01), Agreeableness(r=.141,p<.05)are positively and significantly correlated with transformational leadership among the school educator leaders. However there is no correlation between Agreeableness (r=.068, p>.05) and transactional leadership.This finding clarify by possesing such positif and quality of personality trait will make educator leaders practice more transformational leadership behaviour.On implication note, having potential and capability of positive and consistent personality trait will be a benchmarik for an educator leader to play an important responsibilities in the changes environment especially in educational contexts.
References
Abdul Razak Ibrahin & Ainin Sulaiman. (2000). Gelagat Organisasi. ed. 8. Selangor:Pearson Education Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
Allport, G.W. (1961). Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount. M. K. (1991).The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performances: A Meta Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a Moderator of the Relationship Between the Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 111–118.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K. & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and job performance at the beginning of the new millennium : What do we know and where do we go next ?. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.
Barrick, M.R., Stewart, G.L., Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and Job Performance: Test of the Mediating Effects of Motivation Among Sales Representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 43–51.
Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (2000). MLQ: Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. 2nd edition. Technical Report. Redwood City, CA :Mind Garden.
Bing, M. N., & Lounsbury, J. W. (2000). Openness and Job Performance in U. S.-based Japanese Manufacturing Companies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 515–522. Form S and Form R. Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901–911.
Borman, W. C & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance. In N.Schmitt & W.C. Borman (Eds.). Personnel Selection in Organizations. 71–98. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R., Oppler, S., & Sager, C. (1993). A Theory of Performance. In N.Schmint and W. Borman. Personnel Selection In Organization (pp. 35–70). San Francisco: Joossey- Bass.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Odessa.F1: Psychological Assessment Resources. Inc.
Costa, P. T & Mc Crae, R. R.(1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Profesional Manual. Odesse, Fc: Psychological Assessment Resources. Inc.
Coetzee, C. & Schaap, P. (2005). The Relationship Between Leadership Behaviour, Outcomes of Leadership and Emotional Intelligence. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31(3), 31–38.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The Development of Markers for the Big Five Factor Structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.
Huffman, K. (2007). Psychology in Action. 8th Ed. USA: John and Wiley.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement and Theoretical Perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford.
Judge,T. & Bono, J. E. (2000). Relationship of Core Self-evaluation with Job Satisfaction and Job Performances: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80–92.
Malek Shah Mohd Yusoff & Nor Shah Mohamed. (2004). Peningkatan Prestasi di Tempat Kerja Melalui Aplikasi Kecerdasan Emosi. Jurnal Pengurusan Awam, 3(1), 1–20.
Mahmood Nazar Mohamed. (1990). Pengantar Psikologi: Satu Pengenalan Asas Kepada Jiwa dan Tingkah laku Manusia. Kuala Lumpur: DBP.
Yahya Don. (2009). Korelasi dan Pengaruh Kompetensi Kecerdasan Emosi Terhadap Kepimpinan Sekolah: Perbandingan Antara Sekolah Berkesan dan Sekolah Kurang Berkesan. Tesis PhD. Universiti Malaya.
