The Relationship Between Career Development Practices and High Performance Talent in Private Organization in Malaysia

Authors

  • Nik Hasnaa Nik Mahmood Razak School of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Semarak 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Mohd Helmi Md Yussof Razak School of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Semarak 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Tan Hup Soon Razak School of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Semarak 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Tin Pei Ling Razak School of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Semarak 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v2n2.415

Keywords:

Career development, high performance talent, talent

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between career development practices and high performance talent. Particularly, the objectives of this study were (1) to identify the career development practice in selected service organization; (2) to examine the talent’s perception in regards to career development practice in the organization; (3) to identify the talent’s perception in regards to their current performance; (4) to study the relationship between succession planning, job rotation, pipeline system, mentoring program, educational and tuition reimbursement practices toward developing high performance talent; (5) to determine the relationship between overall career development practices and high performance talent. This study utilized theory developed by Gutteridge (1993), Holstein (2005) and Super (1954). Data were collected by both qualitative and quantitative methods. Focus group discussion with 15 selected Human Resource Manager was initially conducted to help the researchers to develop the survey questionnaire. A number 233 respondents from three selected organizations namely aviation, postal service and manufacturing involved in the survey. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Both descriptive and inferential statistics namely frequency, mean, and Pearson correlation were used to analyze the quantitative data. Results of focus group discussion found that among the career development practices that were practiced in their organizations are job rotation, mentoring, pipeline system, succession planning and education tuition fees reimbursement. Results of that correlation analysis showed a significant relationship between educational and tuition reimbursement, job rotation, mentoring program, pipeline system, succession planning and high performance talent ranges from moderate to strong relationship. The results also showed that overall career development practices was significantly correlated with high performance talent. Lastly, recommendations for practices and future studies were also discussed.

References

Azman Ismail, Nik Ghazali, Aveleena, Michael Kho. (2010). Relationship between Mentoring Program Characteristics and Mentees’ Career: A Case Study in a Malaysian Public University. The Romanian Economic Journal, 13(38), 27–51.

Allen, T. D and Eby L. T., and Poteet M. L. and Lentz, E. and Lima, L. (2004). Career Benefits Associated with Mentoring for Proteges: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 27–36.

Boxall & Purcell. (2003). HR Strategy and Competitive Advantage in Science Sector. Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(3), 5–20.

Chinebuli, C. U. (2013). Evaluation of Human Resource Development Practices on the Productivity and performance of Transport Organizations in Nigeria. Journal of Business and Management, 12(1), 59–70.

Droussiotis, A. and Austin, J. (2007). Job Satisfaction of Managers in Cyprus, Euro Med Journal of Business, 2(2), 208–222.

Ginzberg, E. (1972, 1984). Toward a Theory of Occupational Choice: A Restatement. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 20, 169–176.

Ginzberg, E., Ginsburg, S. W., Axelrad, S., & Herma, J. L. (1951). Occupational Choice: An Approach to a General Theory. New York, Columbia University Press.

Gladwell, M. (2010). Outliers: The Story of Success. Boston, MA : Little, Brown & Company.

Guilford, J. P. (1956). The Structure of Intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293.

Gutteridge, T. G., Leibowiz, Z. B., & Shore, J. E. (1993). Organizational Career Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Herr, E. L. (2001), Career Development and Its Practice: A Historical Perspective. The Career Development Quarterly, 49: 196–211.

Holstein, W. J. (2005). Best Companies for Leaders: P&G’s A.G. Lafley is No. 1 for 2005. The Chief Executive, (November), 16–20.

Iles, P,. Preece, D. and Chuai, X. (2010). Talent Management as a Management Fashion in HRD: Towards a Research Agenda. Human Resource Development International, 13(2), 125–45.

Iles, P., Chuai, X. and D. Preece. (20100. Talent management and HRM in Multinational Companies in Beijing: Definitions, Differences And Drivers. Journal of World Business, 45(2), 179–89.

Iles, P., Preece, D. & Chuai, X. (2010). Talent Management as a Management Fashion in HRD: Towards a Research Agenda. Human Resources Development International, 13(2), 125–145.

Jackson, S. E., Schuler, R. S. (1990). Human Resource Planning:Challenges for Industrial/Organizational Psychologists. American Psychologist, 45(2), 223–239.

Lewis, R. E. and Heckman, R. J. 2006. Talent Management: A Critical Review. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 139–154

Lee, F. H. and Lee, F. Z. (2007).The Relationships between HRM Practices, Leadership Style, Competitive Strategy and Business Performance in Taiwanese Steel Industry. Proceedings of the 13th Asia Pacific Management Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 953–971.

Martin, Romero, Valle and Doland. (2001). Corporate Business Strategy, Career Management and Recruitment: Do Spanish Firms adhere to Contingency Model? Career Development International, 6(3), 149–155.

Mark E. Haskins, George R. Shaffer, (2010). A Talent Development Framework: Tackling the Puzzle. Development and Learning in Organizations, 24(1),1 3–16.

Michaels, Ed., Hanfield-Jones, H. and Axelrod, B.(2001). The War for Talent. Boston: Harvard Business Press

Pascal , A. (2004). Talent Management Systems: Best Practices in Technology Solutions for Recruitment, Retention, and Workforce Planning. In Schweyer (Ed.). Wiley: Canada.

Paul S. (1996). What Works and What Does Not in Career Development Programmes. Career Development International, 1(1), 11–18.

Ready, D. A., Conger, J. A. and Hill, L. A. (2010). Are you a High Potential? Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 78–84.

Robert M. Fulmer, Stephen A. Stump & Jared Bleak. (2009). The Strategic Development of High Potential Leaders. Emerald Group Publishing, 37(3), 17–22.

Rothwell, W. J. and Kazanas, H. C. (1989) Strategic Human Resource Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ;, Prentice-Hall.

Ruwan A (2007). The Impact of Human Resource Practices on Marketing Executive Turnover of Leasing Companies in Sri Lanka. Contemparory Management. Research, 3(3): 63–76.

Sumittra. J and Kannika, J (2012). Effects of Human Resource Development Activity Effectiveness on Business Performance of Jewelry and Gem Businesses in Thailand. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics. 12(5), 131–141.

Sears, S. (1982) A Definition of Career Guidance Terms: A National Vocational Guidance Association Perspective. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 31, 137–143.

Sekaran, U. (2000). Research Methods for Business. New York: John Woley & Son, INC.

Super, D. E. (1954). Career Patterns as a Basis for Vocational Counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1, 12–20.

Zaini Abdullah, Nilufar Ahsan, Syed Shah Alam. The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices on Business Performance among Private Companies in Malaysia International Journal Of Business and Management, 4(6), 65–72.

Downloads

Published

2014-09-09

How to Cite

Nik Mahmood, N. H., Md Yussof, M. H., Hup Soon, T., & Pei Ling, T. (2014). The Relationship Between Career Development Practices and High Performance Talent in Private Organization in Malaysia. Sains Humanika, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v2n2.415