The Regulation of Accounting Education in Malaysia:Professionalisation of Academia and Academisation of the Profession?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v2n3.429Keywords:
Undergraduate accounting education, Malaysian Institute of Accountants, regulation, professionalisationAbstract
This paper attempts to conceptualize the relationship between academia and the sole regulating body for accountants in Malaysia, the Malaysian Institute of Accountants, in the supply chain of accounting graduates from local universities to the society of the accounting profession (Chartered Accountants) in Malaysia. There are many routes to becoming an accountant in Malaysia and the Accountants Act 1967 recognizes that only graduates from MIA accredited Accounting degree programs of Malaysian universities can become members of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants without having to acquire any other professional qualifications. This study will trace the quality assurance put in place by the university and the profession to ensure that the graduates do have the requisite skills to join the profession. Over the years other universities started offering accounting programs as well within the framework of the particular university’s philosophy and mission making each university a “brand†name. The proliferation of higher institutions offering accounting programs has prompted the Ministry of Higher Education to initiate the “Way Forward†think tank ( comprising members of the profession and academic representatives) to deliberate on standardization of curriculum contents and delivery process at institutions of higher learning. The results: Halatuju 1 (Way forward 1) 2001-2005, Way forward 2:2007-2013 and forthcoming: Way forward 3. The process of standardization and benchmarking has seen an increasingly prominent role of the profession in setting the scope of academic content, at times bordering on coercion to implement set ways of delivery of content. Has increasing regulation of accounting programmes at universities produced the desired outcome?Â
References
Accountants Act, 1967 (Act 94), as at 10th May 1988. International Law Book Services, Kuala Lumpur.
Chua, W. F.& Poullaos, C. (1993). Rethinking the Profession-State Dynamic: the Case of the Victorian Charter Attempt. Accounting, Organisation and Society, 691–728.
Dandago, K. I. & Nor Azlina, S. (2013). Effects of Focus on Accounting Research on the Quality of Accounting Education in Malaysian UniversitiesAsian Economic and Financial Review, 1371–1385.
Hao, Z. P. (1999). Regulation and Organization of Accountants in China. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 286–302.
Fogarty, T. J., Hussain, M .E. & Ketz, J. E. (1994). Political Aspects of Financial Accounting Standards Setting in the USA. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 24–46.
Kementerian Pendidikan Tnggi Malaysia. (2006). Hala Tuju 2. Laporan Penilaian Semula Program Perakaunan Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Awam Malaysia. Pusat Penerbitan Universiti (UPENA), UiTM, Shah Alam.
Puxty, A. G. ,Willmott, H., Cooper, D. J. & Lowe, T. 1. (1987). Modes of Regulation in Advanced Capitalism: Locating Accounting in 4 Countries. Accounting, Organisation and Society, 273–291.
Seal, W., Sucher, P. & Zelenka, I. (1996). Post-socialist Transition and the Development of an Accountancy Profession in the Czech Republic. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 485–508.
Susela, S. D. (1996). Case of the Malaysian MICPA. Paper accessed at: http://www//victoria.ac.nz/sac1/6ahic. Accessed on 1 June 2014.
The Star. (2013). Action Plan for Accountancy, 6 May 2013. 1.
------------(2013). More Accountants needed says MIA Chief, 17 September, 2013. 1.
Tower, G. D. (1991). Accounting Regulation as an Instrument of Public Accountability: A Case Study of New Zealand. Ph.D Thesis submitted to MasseyUniversity, New Zealand.
