Automotive Practical Work Practices in Vocational Education: Teacher’s Preferences Using Needham Model

Authors

  • Adnan Ahmad Department of Technical & Engineering Education, Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Rashid Rajuddin Department of Technical & Engineering Education, Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Yusri Kamin Department of Technical & Engineering Education, Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Amiruddin Udin Department of Technical & Engineering Education, Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Hasnul Dahar Minghat Department of Technical & Engineering Education, Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Damon Cartledge La Trobe University Melbourne, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v2n4.464

Keywords:

Automotive practical work, vocational school, teaching and learning, passive learning, Needham model

Abstract

Automotive is the one of vocational subject which offered in Vocational Schools in Malaysia. It contained the theory and practical task. A teacher plays an important role in providing an engaging teaching and learning environment. In traditional teaching and learning process, teacher normally dominated the classroom instruction while student passively receive the knowledge conveyed by the teacher. The research was carrying out to identify the practices in teaching automotive practical work. A few teachers have been asked to state their preferences of teaching material and method. The main of teaching automotive contains introduction, body and conclusion of their teaching. Observations of four teachers conducted based on Gary (1996) suggestion in how to conduct practical work effectively. Needham Model (1987) was applied in identifying whether teachers use what technique to gain students knowledge in automotive related with the elements proposed by Gary (1996). Checklist during classroom observation was analyzed in this paper. In summary, teachers should have variety method and approach to teach vocational subject because the vocational students have different characteristics compared to others field.

References

Albanese, M. A. (2004). Problem-Based Learning-A Review Of Literature On Its Outcomes And Implementation Issues. New York: Freeman.

Boud, D. and Feleti, G. eds. (1992). The Challenge Of Problem-Based Learning. London: Kogan Page.

Charlin, B., Mann, K., & Hansen, P. (1998). The Many Faces of Problem-Based Learning: A Framework For Understanding and Comparison. Teacher, 20(4), 323–331.

Dolmans, D. H, J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (1994). What Drives The Students In Problem-Based Learning. Medical Education, 28, 372–380.

Gary, J. (1996). Learning by doing: A Guide to Teaching & Learning Methods. The Journal Book. Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH.

George, B. (2004). How Students Learn. Published as a Supplement to the Routledge Falmer Key Guides for Effective Teaching.

Margetson, D. (1994). Current Educational Reform And The Significance Of Problem-Based Learning. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 5–19.

Needham, R. (1987). Teaching Strategies for Developing Understanding in Science. Leeds: University of Leeds.

Purcell, A. T. & Gero, J. S. (1998). Drawings And The Design Process. Design Studies, 19(4).

Rebecca, W. T. (1994). Teaching Strategy in Vocational Education and Training. Wesport, CT: Greenwood.

Sharan, T. Y Sturnberg, R. Y. (2001). Creative Thinking In The Classroom. Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 325–338.

Downloads

Published

2014-11-03

How to Cite

Ahmad, A., Rajuddin, M. R., Kamin, Y., Udin, A., Minghat, H. D., & Cartledge, D. (2014). Automotive Practical Work Practices in Vocational Education: Teacher’s Preferences Using Needham Model. Sains Humanika, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v2n4.464