Integrating Cross-Cultural Curriculum into School Based Curriculum: Using Peer Review Technique to Enhance Learners’ English Vocabulary

Authors

  • Hasbullah Said Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Zaitun Hj. Sidin Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v2n4.471

Keywords:

Cross-cultural curriculum, school based curriculum, peer review technique, student' English vocabulary improvement

Abstract

This study was an attempt to investigate the effect of the Peer Review Technique (PRT) in improving students’ English vocabulary. English Vocabulary Improvement (EVI) is an important unit in English subject and the other units are grammar use, pronunciation, writing, reading, speaking, and listening skills. English subject is taught in the Islamic secondary schools in Indonesia by integrating certain elements of various cultures into the School Based Curriculum (SBC). The main focus of this project was to use PRT in teaching EVI after the integration of Cross-cultural curriculum (CCC) into SBC. A class of 40 students having the same level of achievement was chosen for the project. This class was then divided into experimental (20 students) and control (20 students) groups. They were numbered to be selected randomly. The result of investigation proved that the experimental group which was taught English vocabulary using PRT has improved better than the control group which was taught by the conventional approach. The findings of this project indicate that the CCC can be developed to help the teachers’ effort to improve students’ English vocabulary in a plural society.

References

Anonim. (1995). Profil Kelautan Nasional Menuju Kemandirian (Profile of National Sea towards the Indepependence). Panitia Pengembangan Riset dan Teknologi Kelautan serta Industri Maritim, Jakarta.

Anonim. (1999). Simposium Internasional Pernaskahan Nusantara. (International Simposium for Archipelago’s Manuscript). Jakarta: Taman Ismail Marjuki.

Arikunto. (2000). Evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Barrett, Clarck, Stephen and Eric Morganis. (2008). Artifacts and Original intent: A Cross-Cultural Perspective on the Design Stance. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 1–22. Koninkklijke Brill NV, Leiden.

Creswell, John W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Approaches. Third edition. USA: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Depag. (1994). Kurikulum Pendidikan Dasar Berciri Khas Agama Islam: Garis-Garis Besar Program Pengajaran (GBPP), Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTs). Jakarta: Dirjen Pembinaan Kelembagaan Agama Islam.

Diknas. (2005). Buku Panduan KurikulumTingkat Satuan Pendidikan dan Penilaian Siswa. Jakarta: Dinas Pendidikan Nasional.

Doralee, Grindler Katonal et al. (2007). A cross-Cultural Communication: A Model for a New Patern of Relating. An Application of Stopped Process, Leafing, and Crossing. The Folio.

Gay, L. R. (1981). Educational Research: Competencies For Analysis And Application. Colombus: Charles E. Merril Publishing Company.

Gullestrup, Hans. (2002). The Complexity of Intercultural Communication in Cross-Cultural Management. Intercultural Communication, ISSN 1404-1634, 2002 issue 6. URL: http://www.immi.se/intercultural/.

Hoy, Andrew R. (1994). The Relationship Between Male Dominance and Militarism: Quantitative Tests of Several Theories. World Cultures, 8(2), 62–84.

Miranda, Kay. (2001). Effective Peer Teaching Techniques. eHow.com. http://www.ehow.com/way_5299889_effective-peer-teaching-techniques.html#ixzzlqVHf0Pic.

Murdock, George P. (1967). Ethnographic Atlas: A Summary. Pittsburgh: the University of Pittsburgh Press.

Murdock, George Peter and Douglas R. White. (1969). Standard Cross-Cultural Sample. Ethnology, 9, 329–369. (2006 Online edition) [1] (http://repositories.cdlib.org/imbs/socdyn/wp/Standard_Cross-Cultural_Sample).

Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. USA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Nelson, Stephanie. (2000). Teaching Collaborative Writing and Peer Review Techniques to Engineering and Technology Undergraduates. 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontieers in Education Conference. October 18–21, 2000 Kansas City, MO.

Samovar, Larry A.; Porter, Richard E.; and McDaniel, Edwin R. (2006). Intercultural Communication [A Reader]. Printed in the United States of America: Thomson Wadsworth.

Sarwono, Jonathan. (2011). Mixed Methods. Jakarta: PT. Alex Media Komputindo.

Schmitt, Norbert. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Australia: Cambridge University Press.

Topping, Keith. (1998). Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research. http://rer.aera.net. American Educational Research Association and SAGE, http://.sagepublications.com. Fall 1998. 68(3), 249–276.

Wen-Wei hang. (2004). A Cross-Cultural Case Study of Multinational Training Program in the United States and Taiwan. Adult Education Quarterly, 54(3), May 2004. 174–192.

White, Douglas R. (1986). Focused Ethnographic Bibliography for the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample. (http://eclectic.ss.uci.edu/~drwhite/worldcul/SCCSbib.pdf) World Cultures, 2(1), 1–126.

Whiting, John W. M. (1986). George Peter Murdock, (1897–1985). American Anthropologist, 88(3), 682–686 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1525%2Faa.1986.88.3.02a00120).

Downloads

Published

2014-11-03

How to Cite

Said, H., & Hj. Sidin, Z. (2014). Integrating Cross-Cultural Curriculum into School Based Curriculum: Using Peer Review Technique to Enhance Learners’ English Vocabulary. Sains Humanika, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v2n4.471