A Preliminary Study of Chemistry Teachers’ Question in Inquiry Teaching

Authors

  • Winnie Sim Siew Li Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohammad Yusof Arshad Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v2n4.490

Keywords:

Inquiry teaching, verbal interaction, teachers' question

Abstract

Teachers play an important role in the teaching and learning process in science classrooms. They should be proficient in all aspects, including possess good subject content knowledge and should master the pedagogy in teaching the subject. Among the teaching methods suggested is inquiry teaching. Inquiry teaching has been widely known as one of the effective approaches in teaching science. One of the important aspects in inquiry teaching is how questions are used in classroom. In this study, teachers’ question in chemistry lessons via verbal interaction has been investigated. Four chemistry teachers in secondary schools in Kuala Lumpur were involved in a preliminary study. Each chemistry teacher was observed once for a chemistry lesson of 80 minutes. Observations made were videotaped and audiotaped. An observation instrument known as Observation Instrument in Inquiry Teaching through Verbal Interaction (IPIVPI) was used in this study. Findings showed that most of the questions asked were of low level questions, which involves only cognitive memory and convergent thinking questions. Only a few questions were posed for the purpose of stimulate students’ thinking and curiosity in chemistry lessons, questions on the macroscopic, sub-microscopic, symbolic as well as science process skills. This preliminary finding showed that the implementation of inquiry teaching among chemistry teachers is still in doubt. In conclusion, further research in inquiry teaching is needed to investigate this aspect of inquiry teaching in depth.

References

Abrams, E., Southerland, S., & Silva, P. (Eds.). (2008). Inquiry in the Classroom: Realities and Opportunities. Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing, Inc.

Asoko, H. (2000). Learning to Teach Science in the Primary School. In R. Miller, J. Leach & J. Osborne (Eds.). Improving Science Education: The Contribution of Research (pp. 79–93). Buckingham: Open University Press.

Beall, H., Trimbur, J., & Weininger, S. J. (1994). Mastery Insight and the Teaching of Chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3(2), 99–105.

Brandon, P.R., Taum, A. K. H., Young, D. B., Pottenger III, & Thomas, M. (2008). The Complexity of Measuring the Quality of Program Implementation with Observations: The Case of Middle School Inquiry-Based Science. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(3), 235–250.

Chang, C. Y., & Mao, S. L. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan Science Students’ Outcomes With Inquiry-Group versus Traditional Instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(6), 340–346.

Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to Teach Science as Inquiry in the Rough and Tumble of Practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642.

Eggleston, J. F., Galton, M., & Jones, M. (1975). A Science Teaching Observation Schedule. London: Macmillan Education.

Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing Teaching Behaviour. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Frost, J., & Turner, T. (Eds.). (2005). Learning to Teach Science in the Secondary School: A Companion to School Experience. 2nd ed. London: Routledge Falmer.

Galton, M., Hargreaves, L., Comber, C., Wall, D. & Pell, T. (1999). Changes in Patterns of Teacher Interaction in Primary Classroom: 1976-1996. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 23–37.

Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Progressive Inquiry in a Computer-Supported Biology Class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1072–1088.

Hassard, J. (2005). The Art of Teaching Science: Inquiry and Innovation in Middle Schooland High School. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hassard, J. & Dias, M. (2009). The Art of Teaching Science Inquiry and Innovation in Middle School. New York: Routledge.

Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is Science Difficult to Learn? Things are Seldom What They Seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83.

Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J. (2011): Scaffolding Science Talk: The Role of Teachers’ Question in the Inquiry Classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 1–24. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.604684.

Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing Inquiry-Based Science With Teachers: Essential Research for Lasting Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631–645.

Llewellyn, D. (2005). Making Inquiry Second Nature to Students: Teaching High School Science Through Inquiry. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.

Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining Inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 4–37.

Mohamed Najib Abdul Ghafar. 1997. Access and Success in Higher Education. Skudai: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (2000). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Kimia Tingkatan Empat. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.

Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (2001). Nota Penerangan Pusat Latihan Kursus Orientasi Sains KBSM PuLKOS Inkuiri Penemuan dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Sains. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Ross, K., Lakin, L., & Callaghan, P. (2000). Teaching Secondary Science: Constructing Meaning and Developing Understanding. London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd.

Rowe, M. B. (1978a). Wait, Wait, Wait…. School Science and Mathematics, 78(3), 207–216.

Rowe, M. B. (1978b). Teaching Science as Continuous Inquiry: A Basic. 2nd ed. Mc Graw Hill Company: New York.

Singer, F. M. (2001). Structuring the Information—A New Way of Perceiving the Content of Learning. ZDM/MATHDI, 6, 204–217.

Tsaparlis, G., Kolioulis, D., & Pappa, E. (2010). Lower-Secondary Introductory Chemistry Course: A Novel Approach Based on Science-Education Theories with Emphasis on the Macroscopic Approach, and the Delayed Meaningful Teaching of the Concepts of Molecule and Atom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(2), 107–117.

Tay, C. S. (2010). Amalan Konstruktivis Guru Sains Sekolah Rendah Melalui Interaksi Verbal Bilik Darjah. (Unpublished Doctorate Thesis). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor.

Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry Projects in Science Teacher Education: What Can Investigative Experiences Reveal About Teacher Thinking and Eventual Classroom Practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143.

Downloads

Published

2014-11-03

How to Cite

Siew Li, W. S., & Arshad, M. Y. (2014). A Preliminary Study of Chemistry Teachers’ Question in Inquiry Teaching. Sains Humanika, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v2n4.490