Pengintegrasian Teknologi Web 2.0 dalam Mencapai Pembelajaran Bermakna
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v5n1.592Keywords:
Web 2.0 technology, twitter, integrated meaningful e-training, qualitative, semi-structured interviewAbstract
The education system in Malaysia is constantly changing in terms of the use of technology in teaching and learning process (T&L). Many studies have been conducted to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the technologies in the classroom. However, lack of studies have been made to identify students' perceptions of the integration of Web 2.0 approaches in achieving meaningful learning. The objective of this study was to identify the perception of the students’ feeling, technologies’ strengths, weaknesses, challenges and suggestions while using Web 2.0 technologies in order to achieve meaningful learning. Semi-structured interview protocol was used and the study was carried out through the interaction on Twitter towards 13 undergraduate students of Teaching English as a Second Language. The study found that the integration of technology in the classroom will increase student interest in using Web 2.0 technologies. Besides, result shows that there were several advantages and disadvantages of Web 2.0 technology integration in T&L process. This study aims to help teachers and the implementer of I-MeT model to make improvements in T&L process based on the challenges and suggestions provided by the respondents through their perceptions. Further research was suggested to be done in finding out lecturers’ perception based on integration of Web 2.0 technologies to achieve meaningful learning.
References
Adnan, A., Din, R., Mohd Hassim, M. S., Hassan, H., Ahmad, J., Mohamed, N., & Abu Hassan, M. N. (2013). Cabaran dalam Pelaksanaan E-Pembelajaran bagi Program Pensiswazahan Guru (PPG). Jurnal Penyelidikan Tempawan, 13–23.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G., & Fox, S. (2002). On the internet no one knows I'm an introvert": Extroversion, neuroticism, and internet interaction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(2), 125–128.
Anon. (2011). The New 3 E's of Education: Enable, engaged, empowered How Today’s Students Are Leveraging Emerging Technologies for Learning Retrieved from http://www.tomorrow.org/speakup/pdfs/SU10_3EofEducation_Students.pdf
Anon. (2012). Online Bullying Among Youth 8-17 Years Old – Malaysia: Microsoft Corporation.
Anon. (2013). Peruntukan terbesar buat sektor pendidikan. myMetro. 25 Oktober 2013:1.
Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? National Center for Research Methods. Retrieved from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/
Danciu, E., & Grosseck, G. (2011). Social aspects of web 2.0 technologies: teaching or teachers’ challenges? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3768–3773.
Din, R., Norman, H., Faisal Kamarulzaman, M., M. Shah, P., Mat Salleh, N. S., Zakaria, M. S. & Mastor, K.A. (2012). Creation of a Knowledge Society via the Use of Mobile Blog: A Model of Integrated Meaningful Hybrid E-training. Asian Social Science, 8(16), 45–56.
Din, R., Mohamad Sahari Nordin, Norlide Abu Kassim, Tunku Badariah Tunku Ahmad, Kamaruzaman Jusoff, Nur Ayu Johar, Muhammad Faisal Kamarul Zaman, Mohamad Shanudin Zakaria, Mazalah Ahmad, Aidah Abdul Karim, Khairul Anwar Mastor. (2010). Development and Validation of Meaningful Hybrid Eâ€Training Model for Computer Education. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies (IJCSIT), 1(3), 179–184. Indexed in Scopus.
Din, R., Mohamad Shanudin Zakaria, Mohamad Sahari Nordin, M Faisal Kamarul Zaman, Noor Lide Abu Kassim, Tunku Badariah Tunku Ahmad, Khairul Anwar Mastor, Aidah Abdul Karim & Mohamed Amin Embi. (2011). A Meaningful Hybrid E-Training Measure And Model For Technology In Education. AJTLHE, 3(2), 71–82.
Din, R. (2010). Development and validation of an integrated meaningful hybrid e-Training (I-MeT) for Computer Science: Theoretical-empirical based design and development approach. Tesis Dr. Fal, Fakulti Teknologi dan Sains Maklumat, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Fristchi, J., & Wolf, M. A. (2012). Turning on Mobile Learning in North America. Retrived at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002160/216083e.pdf
Glenn, M. (2008). The Future of Higher Education: How Technology will Shape Learning? Economist Intelligence Unit. Retrieved from http://www.nmc.org/pdf/Future-of-Higher-Ed-(NMC).pdf
Grosseck, G. (2009). To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education? . Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 478–482.
Hamdan, A., Din, R., Abdul Manaf, S. Z., Mat Salleh, N. S., Kamarul Zaman, M. F., & Ab Khalid, R. (2012). Penerimaan Pelajar Terhadap Penggunaan Teknologi Web 2.0 di Malaysia. Paper presented at the International Seminar Educational Comparative in Competency Based Curriculum Between Indonesia and Malaysia. Bandung.
Hamdan, A., Din, R., Adnan, A., Abdul Manaf, S. Z., Ismail, N. M., Mat Salleh, N. S., & Shafiin, H. (2013). Penggunaan Teknologi Web 2.0 Dalam Pembelajaran Hibrid. Tempawan Jurnal Penyelidikan, 87–103.
Harrel, M. C. & Bradley, M. A. (2009). Data Collection Methods: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Pittsburgh: RAND Corporation.
Harris, A. L. & Rea, A. (2009). Web 2.0 and Virtual World Technologies: A Growing Impact on IS Education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 137–144.
Howe, E., & Kekwaletswe, R. (2010). Utilizing Web 2.0 in a Virtual Learning Environment: A South African Context. Paper presented at the IADIS International Conference e-Society.
Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D. H. & Marra, R. M. (2012). Meaningful with technology (4th edition). London : Pearson.
Irvine, A., & Drew, P., R. (2012). 'Am I not answering your questions properly?' Clarification, adequacy and responsiveness in semi-structured telephone and face-to-face interviews. Qualitative Research, 13(1), 87–106.
Jonassen, D. H. (1995). Supporting communities of learners with technology: A vision for integrating technology with learning in school. Educational Technology, 35(4), 60–63.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking. London:Merrill.
Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2010). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1–14.
Juwah, C., Macfarlane-Dick, D., Matthew, B., Nicol, D., Ross, D., & Smith, B. (2004). Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. The Higher Education Academy Generic Centre, 1–40.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia, 2013-2025.
Keskitalo, T., Pyykkö, E., & Ruokamo, H. (2011). Exploring the Meaningful Learning of Students in Second Life. Educational. Technology & Society, 14(1), 16–26.
Kingsley, K. V. & Brinkerhoff, J. (2011). Web 2.0 Tools for Authentic Instruction, Learning, and Assessment. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 23(3), 9–12.
Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in Schools A Research of Gender Differences. School Psychology International, 27(2), 157–170.
Lichy, J. (2012). Towards an international culture: Gen Y students and SNS?. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(2), 101–116.
Lowe, B., & Laffey, D. (2011). Is Twitter for the Birds?: Using Twitter to Enhance Student Learning in a Marketing Course. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(2), 183–192.
Maknun, C. L. L. i. (2013). Internet-Based Mathematics Learning: Is Indonesia Able To Put The Internet Into Mathematics Classroom? Paper presented at the GSE. Journal Of Education, 2013.
Melor, M. Y., Kwan, S. L. L. & Noriah, M. I. (2012). Benefits of using Web 2.0 Technologies for English Language Learning: Gifted Students’ Perception. Advances in Environment, Computational Chemistry and Bioscience. Retrieved 30 November 2014 from http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2012/Montreux/BIOCHEMENV/BIOCHEMENV-61.pdf
Meyers, S. A. (2014). Three Strategies for Creating Meaningful Learning Experiences. Retrieved 30 November 2014 from http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/effective-teaching-strategies/three-strategies-creating-meaningful-learning-experiences/
Novak, J. D. (2011). A Theory Of Education: Meaningful Learning Underlies The Constructive Integration Of Thinking, Feeling, And Acting Leading To Empowerment For Commitment And Responsibility. Meaningful Learning Review, 1(2), 1–14.
Pathak, A., & Intratat, C. (2012). Use of Semi-Structured Interviews to Investigate Teacher Perceptions of Student Collaboration. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 8(1), 1–12.
Pongsuwan, S., Hoksuwan, S., In-udom, W. &Chalakbang, W. (2011). European Journal of Social Sciences, 24(4), 625–633.
Popescu, E. (2010). Students' Acceptance of Web 2.0 Technologies in Higher Education: Findings from a Survey in a Romanian University. Paper presented at the Proceedings DEXA Workshops. 92–96.
Ramos, J. L. S., Dolipas, B. B., & Villamor, B. B. (2013). Higher Order Thinking Skills and Academic Performance in Physics of College Students: A Regression Analysis. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, (4), 48–60.
Raymond, G., & McKimm, J. (2010). Medical Education and E-Learning Opportunities in the South Pacific. Samoa Medical Journal, 32–40.
Redecker, C., Ala-Mutkar, K., Bacigalupo, M., Ferrari, A., & Punie, Y. (2009). Learning 2.0: The Impact of Web 2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe. 1–123. Luxemborg.
Sawant, S. S. (2012). The study of use of Web 2.0 tools in LIS education in India. Hi Tech News, 29 (2).
Scanlon, P. M., & Neumann, D. R. (2002). Internet Plagiarism Among College Students. Journal of College Student Development, 43(3), 374–385.
Taranto, G., Dalbon, M., & Gaetano, J. (2011). Academic Social Networking Brings Web 2.0 Technologies to the Middle Grades. Middle School Journal, 12–19.
The Annual Cyberbullying Survey. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.ditchthelabel.org/annual-cyber-bullying-survey-cyber-bullying-statistics.
Toland, R. (2013). Facebook as a Learning Tool. Perspectives in Learning, 14(1), 40–44.
Wilhelm, J. D. (2012). Our Compulsory Goals: Effective Teaching and Meaningful Learning through Powerful Cultural Tools. Voices from the Middle, 19(4), 81–83.
Wójcik, J. (2012). Attitudes of Polish Students Towards Web 2.0 Technology. In H. Sroka, S. Stanek & M. Pańkowska (Eds.). Creativity Support Systems. Methods, and Applications, 119–130. Katowice.
Yunianta, A., Yusof, N., Othman, M.S., Octaviani, D. (2012). Analysis and Categorization of e-Learning Activities based on Meaningful Learning Characteristics. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 69, 811–816.
