Agency Theory And Demand For Audit By Small Businesses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v5n2.633Keywords:
Agency theory, voluntary audit, small businesses, sole-proprietors, partnerships.Abstract
It is mandatory for small companies in Malaysia to carry out an audit regardless of their size. Only sole proprietors and partnerships are exempted from this audit, as they are enacted under different regulations. This study aims to examine the characteristics of these small businesses and their demand for voluntary audit from the agency theory perspective. The data for the study were obtained from primary sources. About 100 questionnaires were distributed to sole proprietors and partnerships in Malaysia, however only 62 samples were usable for the purpose of the study. Interviews were also conducted to obtain further insight of the variable under study. Independent t-tests were employed to compare the characteristics between the groups. The results of the study indicate that businesses, which have higher managerial ownership among Malaysian small businesses, demand significantly less audit voluntarily compared to those businesses, which have lower managerial ownership. The sole-proprietors also appear to demand significantly less voluntary audit compared to partners in the partnerships. This may be because they view themselves as the monitoring mechanism in their businesses, which reduce the need for audit, as they are also the owners of the businesses. In addition, the result also indicates that businesses, which have more employees, would significantly demand more voluntary audit compared to those with less employees. This result is consistent with agency theory, which posits that as the number of agents (employees) who manage the businesses increases the demand and need for audit would also arise. In addition, the results also suggest that those small businesses, which are larger and have more liabilities would voluntarily demand more audit compared to those, which are smaller and have less liabilities.
References
Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A. & Lin, J. W. (2000). Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. The Journal of Finance, 56(1), 81–106.
Arrey, D. O. & David, M. G. (2008). Demand for Auditing in Small Firms: An Impact on Small Companies in Sweden That Are Not Required by The Legislation to Have Their Account Audited. Master Thesis, Umea Business School.
Ball, R. & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earning Quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39, 83–128.
Basu, S. K. (2007). Auditing: Principles and Techniques, Pearson Education, India.
Collis, J. (2003). Directors’ Views on Exemption from the Statutory Audit, A Research Report for the Department on Trade and Industry, 1–55.
Collis, J. (2005). Size Theory and the Demand for Voluntary Audit by Small Companies in the UK, presented in workshop on Accounting in Europe Beyond 2005. University of Regensburg, Germany, 1-16.
Cox, K. (1992). Small Company Audit Have Got to Go. Accountancy, 30.
Chow, C.W. (1982). The Demand for External Auditing: Size, Debt and Ownership Influences. The Accounting Review, 57(2), 272–291.
Chung, S. and Narasimhan, R. (2001). Perceived Value of Mandatory Audits of Small Companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 15, 120–123.
Fadzly, M. N. and Ahmad, Z. (2003). The Perceived Value of Statutory Audit: Malaysian Users’ Perspective. Unpublished Article, 1–25.
Francis, J. R., Khurana, I. K., Martin, X. and Pereira, I. (2005). The Role of Firm-specific Incentives and Country-level Factors in the Voluntary Demand for Independent Audits. MO: 3rd European Audit Research Network Symposium, 2005.
Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of Univariate and Multivariate Data Analysis and Interpretation with SPSS. Taylor & Francis Group,
Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
Kaur, J. and Kurt, N. (2008). Voluntary Audits- Motives of Executing Voluntary Audits in Partnership Firms in Jönköping. Master Thesis, Jönköping International Business School.
Loh, A., Ariff, M., Ismail, Z., Shamsher, M. and Ali, M. (1995). Compliance Costs of Corporate Income Taxation in Malaysia. Pacific Accounting Review, 9(1), 27.
Mustapha, M. and Che Ahmad, A. (2011a). Agency Costs of Debts and Monitoring. International Review of Business Research Paper, 7(4), 118–129.
Mustapha, M. and Che Ahmad, A. (2011b). Agency theory and managerial ownership: evidence from Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(5), 419–436.
Nazir, S., Khan, S., Jamil, R. A., and Mehmood, Q. S. (2014). Impact of Customer relationship Management on Customer Satisfaction in Hoteling Industry. Journal of Management Info, 3(1), 84–98.
Niskanen, M., Karjalainen, J, and Niskanen, J. (2010). The role of auditing in small, private family firms: Is it about Quality and credibility? Family Business Review, 23(3), 234–245.
Norris, D. M. (1984). Compensating Control: Who Does What in the EDP Department?. National Public Accountant, 29(5), 46–49
Porter, B., Simon, J. and Hatherly, D. (2003). Principles of External Auditing, Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Qureshi, M. I., Khan, A., & Zaman, K. (2012). Structural investigation of service quality in conventional and Islamic banking in Pakistan. Industrial Engineering Letters, 2(2), 11–17.
Rasli, A. M., Norhalim, N., Kowang, T. O., & Qureshi, M. I. (2014). Applying Managerial Competencies To Overcome Business Constraints And Create Values Evidence From Small Technology-Based Firms In Malaysia. Journal Of Management Info, 3(1), 99–121.
Salleh, A., Che Rose, R., Kumar, N. and Jaafar, S. (2008). Auditors’ Perceptions on Obliteration of Mandatory Annual Audit: An Empirical Study, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 14, 61–66.
Schmidt, C. H. (1952). Analyzing The Effect of Business Size on Sources and Uses of Fund, Research in Business Finance, 36–37. National Bureau of Economic Research,
Tauringana, V. and Clarke, S. (2000). The Demand for External Auditing: Managerial Share Ownership, Size, Gearing and Liquidity Influences. Managerial Auditing Journal, 15(4), 160–168.
