Relationship Between Organizational Antecedent And Knowledge Sharing Practices Among Academician At Malaysia Research Universities.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v5n2.637Keywords:
Knowledge sharing practice, organizational antecedents, SECIAbstract
The purpose of this study is to determine relationship between organizational antecedent and knowledge sharing practices among academician at Malaysia Research Universities. The hypothesis for this research are organizational antecedent has relationship with knowledge sharing practices. The variables in this study are organizational antecedent which consist of people, organization and technology, well for knowledge sharing practices consist of socialization, externalization, combination and internalization. Applying the theory of multiple perseptive for organizational antecedent and SECI for knowledge sharing practices. The data analysis measured this research were using software of statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 22 and measuring for structural equation modelling (SEM) software of analysis of moment structures (AMOS) version 22. The findings of this study largely support the hypothesized relationship proposed in the theoretical model. Specifically, the results the relationship of organizational antecedents and knowledge sharing practice. This research make several theoretical contributions and provides further insight on knowledge sharing practice among academician in research universities. Methodological and practical implications were discussed. This research helped to produce a segment in a more inclusive global picture of independent variable that organizational antecedents and dependent variable that knowledge sharing practice.
References
Anderson and Gerbing, (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-steps approach. Psychology Bulletin. 103(3), 411–423
Babbie, E. (1992). The Practice of Social Research (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Bagozzi and Yi, (1988). On the evaluation of Structural Equation Modeling. Academy of Marketing Science. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science. Spring 1988, 16
Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait –multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(1), 81–105.
Chow, W. S. and Lui, K. H. (2001). Discriminating factors of information systems function performance in Hong Kong firms practicing TQM. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(5/6), 749–771.
Churchill, (1995). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research (pre-1986), Feb 1979(16), 000001; ABI/INFORM Globalpg. 64
Cohen, J.W. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fornell and Larcker, (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 18(1), 39–50
Gerbing and Hamilton, (1996).
Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International,Inc.
Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International,Inc.
Hair, J. F., R. B. Bush, and D. J. Ortinau. (2003). Marketing Research Within A Changing Information Environment. New York,NY: McGraw-Hill.
Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework. Knowledge Management and HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 2(4), 337–359.
Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations And Extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Khan, N. U. (2014). Examining the Moderating Role of Self-monitoring in Predicting Employees Speaking Up Behavior at Workplace. Journal Of Management Info, 2(1).
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principle and Practice of Structural Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Nonaka, I. (1994). The dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.
Nonaka, I.,&Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: Howjapanese Companies Create The Dynamics Of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step By Step Guide To Data Analysis Using SPSS For Windows (Version 10). NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
Qureshi, M. I., Janjua, S. Y., Zaman, K., Lodhi, M. S., & Tariq, Y. B. (2014). Internationalization of higher education institutions: implementation of DMAIC cycle. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2295–2310.
Shafiq, M., and Qureshi, M. I. (2014). Quadruple Culture Type Approaches Impacting Employees Attributes. Journal Of Management Info, 2(1).
Sekaran, U. (2003) Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach.USA: John Wiley and Sons.
Roziana Sharif, (2009). Human Resource Development And Knowledge Sharing Practices Among Academicians In Malaysian Public Universities. Thesis unpublished
Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using Multivariate Statistics, New York: Harper Collins.
Yeop Abdullah Ibrahim (1994). Human Resource Development for Industrialization. Malaysian Management Review, 29(1). Available online at http://resources.mim.edu.my/mmr/MA1010.htm
Zikmund, W. G. (1994). Business research methods. 4th ed. Fort Worth: Dryden. (2003). Exploring Marketing Research. Cincinnati,Ohio: Thomson/South-Western.
