Penilaian Psikometrik Instrumen Kesediaan Guru sebagai Pemimpin Guru

Authors

  • Lokman Mohd. Tahir Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Rohaya Talib Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Hamimah Mohd Naim Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohamad Berhanddin Musah Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n2.977

Keywords:

Teacher leadership, item reliability and validity

Abstract

The leadership of teacher remains as an essentially topic of educational leadership currently and it becomes teacher’s main role in implementing the school development process. However, there are less studies done in Malaysian schools; even hardly see Malaysian teachers are prepared to be teacher leaders  due to also lack of reliable and valid instrument that measure teacher leadership within Malaysian context. Therefore, this paper aims to examine the readiness of Malaysian teachers to be selected as teacher leaders among other teachers. Secondly, it also aims to measure the reliability and validity of instrument on teacher leadership in the context of Malaysian teachers. A total of 189 secondary school teachers who have more than five years’ experience were selected to be the respondents to answer the 12 items on teachers’ readiness as teacher leaders based on two main constructs such as personal and professional readiness. Finding from the factor analyses (exploratory and confirmatory) indicated that items from the professional and personal readiness constructs have high convergent validity in measuring the relevant teacher leadership. In addition, values from the correlational matrix also indicated high values of discriminant validity. Hence, it was proved that the teacher leadership readiness instrument has high validity and reliability in examining teachers’ readiness as a teacher leader. 

References

Aliakbari, M., & Sadeghi, A. (2014). Iranian Teachers’ Perceptions Of Teacher Leadership Practices In Schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4), 576-592.

Beachum, F., & Dentith, A. M. (2004). Teacher Leaders: Creating Cultures Of School Renewal And Transformation. Educational Forum, 68(3), 276 – 286.

Boles, K., & Troen, V. (1994). Teacher Leadership in a Professional Development School. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Los Angeles, April 4-8.

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement In The Human Sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Brislin, R.W. (1986). The wording And Translation Of Research Instruments. In: Lonner WJ, & Berry, J.W, (eds.) Field Methods In Cross-Cultural Research, 137-164. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Danielson, C. (2007). The Many Faces Of Teacher Leadership. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 14 – 19.

Day, C. Stobart, G., Sammons, P., Kington, A., Gu, Q., Smees, R., & Mujtaba, T. (2007). Variations on Teachers’ Works, Lives And Effectiveness. Research report. London: Department of Education And Skills.

DeVilliers, E (2010). Teacher Leadership: Perspectives, Perceptions And Readiness Of Educators in the Eden and Central Karoo Education District in the Western Cape Province. Unpublished EdD thesis in Educational Management, University of South Africa.

DeHart, C. A. (2011). A Comparison Of Four Frameworks Of Teacher Leadership For Model Fit. Phd Dissertation, Graduate School, University of Tennessee.

Ellis, P. D. (2010). The Essential Guide To Effect Sizes: Statistical Power, Meta-Analysis, And The Interpretation Of Research Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

English, F.W. (2006) (eds.). Encyclopedia Of Educational Leadership And Administration, 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fairman, J., & Mackenzie, S. (2015) How Teacher Leaders Influence Others And Understand Their Leadership, International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 18(1), 61-87.

Frost, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher Leadership: Towards A Research Agenda. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 479–498.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson-Hall.

Harris, A. and Muijs, D. (2005). Improving Schools Through Teacher Leadership. New York: Open University.

Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables And Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1), 39-50.

Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2001). Awakening The Giant: Helping Teachers Develop As Leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening The Giant: Helping Teachers Develop As Leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press

Kilinc, A.L. (2014). Examining the Relationship Between Teacher Leadership And School Climate. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 14(5), 1729-1742.

Leonard, J., Petta, K., & Porter, C. (2014). A Fresh New Look At Graduate Programs In Teacher Leadership In the United States. In Alexandrou, A., & Swaffield, S. (eds.), Teacher Leadership And Professional Development, 29 – 44. New York: Routledge.

Levenson, M. (2014). Pathways to Teacher Leadership: Emerging Models, Changing Roles. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Education Press.

Manno, C.M., & Firestone, W.A. (2008). Content is The Subject: How Teacher Leaders With Different Subject Knowledge Interact With Teachers. In M. Mangin, & S.R. Stoelinga (eds.), Effective Teacher Leadership: Using Research To Inform And Reform, 36 – 54. New York: Teacher College Press.

Muijs, D. (2011). Doing Quantitative Research In Education with SPSS. London: Sage.

Miller, B., Moon, J., & Elko, S. (2000). Teacher Leadership In Mathematics And Science: Casebook And Facilitator’s Guide. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Patterson, J., & Patterson, J. (2004). Sharing The Lead. Educational Leadership, 61(7), 74-78.

Ramayah, T., Yeap, J.A.L., & Ignatius, J. (2014). Assessing Knowledge Sharing Among Academics: A Validation Of The Knowledge Sharing Behavior Scale (KSBS). Evaluation Review 38(2), 160-187.

Ross, D., Adams, A., Bondy, E., Dana, N., Dodman, S., & Swain, C. (2011). Preparing Teacher Leaders: Perceptions Of The Impact Of A Cohort-Based, Job Embedded, Blended Teacher Leadership Program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1213- 1222.

Sahlberg, P. (2013). Teachers as Leaders in Finland. Educational Leadership, October, 36 – 40.

Snell, J., & Swanson, J. (2000). The Essential Knowledge And Skills Of Teacher Leaders: A Search For A Conceptual Framework. Paper Presented At The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

Sperber, A.D., Devellis, R.F., Boehlecke, B. (1994) Cross-Cultural Translation. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 25(4), 501–524.

Stoelinga, S.R. (2008). Leading Form Above And Below: Formal And Informal Teacher Leadership. In M. Mangin, & S.R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective Teacher Leadership: Using Research To Inform And Reform, 36 – 54. New York: Teacher College Press.

Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2001). Countering the Critics: Responses To Recent Critics Of School Effectiveness Research. School Effectiveness & School Improvement. 12, 41-82.

Triska, J.W. (2007). Measuring Teacher Leadership. Unpublished Master of Arts in Education thesis. Humboldt State University.

Voss, G.B., & Voss, Z.G. (2008). Competitive Density And The Customer Acquisition-Retention Trade-Off. Journal of Marketing, 72, 3-18.

Wasley, P. A. (1991). Teachers Who Lead: The Rhetoric Of Reform And The Realities Of Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do We Know About Teacher Leadership? Findings From Two Decades Of Scholarship. Review of Educational Research 74(3), 255- 316.

Zhang, W. (2013). Developing Middle Leaders: The Problematic Nature Of Socialisation Theory And Leadership Learning. In Brundrett, M. (eds.) Principles Of School Leadership, 189-202. London: Sage.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-29

How to Cite

Mohd. Tahir, L., Talib, R., Mohd Naim, H., & Musah, M. B. (2017). Penilaian Psikometrik Instrumen Kesediaan Guru sebagai Pemimpin Guru. Sains Humanika, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n2.977

Issue

Section

Articles