Persuasive Writing: How Students Argue

Authors

  • Farous Izwan Abdul Aziz Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) Skudai, 81310, Johor, Malaysia
  • Ummul Khair Ahmad Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) Skudai, 81310, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n4-2.1356

Keywords:

Toulmin's Model, persuasive writing skills, persuasive elements

Abstract

English persuasive writing is an important skill to be mastered by students as it is highly valued when and if students continue their studies to a higher education level. The objectives of this study are to: (1) identify  the  distinctive features of persuasive essays commonly adopted by Malaysian students; (2) investigate the problems students encounter while developing their arguments, and (3) to suggest strategies that can improve students’ persuasive writing skills.  Seventy-nine essay samples from four secondary schools were  selected for the analysis and Toulmin’s Model was employed as the tool for  analyzing the essays.  The focus of the analysis is to uncover the persuasive elements that the students have applied in their writing. The raw data were gathered by reading each of the essays and labeling the persuasive elements (claim, grounds, warrant, backing, rebuttal and qualifiers) which were identified.  Findings from the analysis have indicated that the students applied the basic persuasive elements: claim, grounds and warrant. It was also discovered that the students lacked  the optional persuasive elements; qualifier, rebuttal and backing. Students need to be exposed to new or alternative strategies of composing in order  to help improve their persuasive writing skills.

References

Applebee, A., Langer, J. & Mullis, I. (1986). The Writing Report Card: Writing Achievements In American Schools. Princeton, NJ: Education Testing Services.

Black, K. (1989). Audience Analysis And Persuasive Writing At The College Level. Research in the Teaching of English, 23(3), 231-253.

Burkhalter, N. (1995). A Vygotsky-Based Curriculum For Teaching Persuasive Writing In The Elementary Grades. Language Arts, 72(3), 192-199.

Cahyono, B.Y. (2000). Rhetorical Strategies Used In The English Persuasive Essays Of Indonesian University Students of EFL. PETRA, 2(1), 31-39.

Connor, U. (1990). Linguistic/Rhetorical Measures For International Persuasive Student Writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 24(1), 67-87.

Crowhurst, M. (1990). Teaching and Learning The Writing Of Persuasive / Argumentative Discourse. Canadian Journal of Education, 15(4), 348-359.

Durst, R., Laine, C., Schultz, L. M., & Vilter, W. (1990). Appealing Texts: The Persuasive Writing Of High School Students. Written Communication, 7(2), 232–255.

El-daly, H.M. (2011). Linguistic Aspects Of The Narrative And Persuasive Written Productions Of Arabic And Spanish Speakers: Focus On The Role Of Explicit Knowledge Of Grammar. Arab World English Journal, 2(1), 77-122.

Flower, L. & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory Of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.

Fei-Wen, C. & Yueh-Miao, C. (2009). Taiwanese Argumentation Skills: Contrastive Rhetoric Perspective. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 1(1), 23-50.

Fei-Wen, C. (2010). A Socio-Cognitive Modeling Approach To Teaching English Argumentation. Asian ESP Journal, 6(1), 120-146.

Gleason, M. M. (1999). The Role Of Evidence In Argumentative Writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 15(1), 81-106.

Hamizah, Z & Moore, R.A. (2003) Audience Awareness In L1 And L2 Of Bilingual Writers. TESL EJ 7(1), Date of Retrieval: October 26, 2011 from: http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume7/ej25/ej25a2.

Hormazabal, R. D. (2007). Argumentative Writing Strategies And Perceptions Of Writing Academic By EFL College Students, Literatura y Linguistica, 18, 253-282

Hernandez, A. Kaplan, M. A., Schwartz, R. (2006). For the Sake Of Argument. Educational Leadership, 64(2), 48-52.

Hillocks, G. (2011). Teaching Argument Writing, Grades 6-12: Supporting Claims With Relevant Evidence And Clear Reasoning. HEINEMANN, Portsmouth, NH.

Irish, R. K. (2003). The Uses Of Toulmin: The Value Of An Explicit Model Of Argument For Academic And Working Engineers. IEEE International Professional

Communication Conference. 2003. IEEE International, 48-55.

Johnson, T. S., Thompson, L., Smagorinsky, P., & Fry, P. G. (2012). To Teach The Five-Paragraph Theme Learning. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 136-176.

Karbach, J. (1987). Using Toulmin’s Model Of Argumentation. Journal of Teaching Writing, 6(1), 81-91.

Knudson, R. E. (2012). Effects Strategies, Grade, And Sex On Students' Persuasive Writing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 59(2), 141–152.

Lunsford, K. J. (2002). Contexualizing Toulmin’s Model In The Writing Classroom: A Case Study. Written Communication, 19(1), 109-174.

Nimehchisalem, V., & Mukundan, J. (2011). Determining the Evaluative Criteria Of An Argumentative Writing Scale. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 58-70.

Ooi, J & Seelan, S. (2011). SPM Composition: Learning Through Diagrams.UG Press Sdn. Bhd, Selangor Darul Ehsan.

Osman, W.H. & Bakar, A.L.A. (2009). Learning To Write An Academic Paper Among Medical Students of Universiti Malaysia Sabah. 2nd International Conference

of Teaching and Learning. 2009. INTI University College, Malaysia, 1-21.

Rafik-Galea S., Zainuddin, S. Z., & Galea, P. V. (2008). Learning to Think Critically The Toulmin Way. 13th Seminar International Conference on Thinking. 2008. Sweden.

Rashid, S, & Chan. S. H. (2008). Exploring the Interplay Of Mode Of Discourse And Proficiency Level In ESL Writing Performance : Implications For Testing. The English Teacher, XXXVII, 105-122.

Smith, S. N. (2008). The Art Of Rhetoric: Understanding The How Of Persuasive Writing. Date of Retrieval: 10th May 2017 from: http://www.ic.arizona.edu/ic/snsmith/rhetanal/AristotleChartForm.pdf.

Stambaugh, T. (2011). William and Mary for beginners: Research based models. College William and Mary: Centre for Gifted Education.

Stapleton, P. (2001). Assessing Critical Thinking In The Writing Of Japanese University Students: Insights About Assumptions And Content Familiarity. Written Communication, 18(4), 506-548.

Tan K. E. (2006). Writing English Essays Within Dominant Discourses In Malaysian Schools. The Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 21(1), 23-45.

Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses Of Argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Uccelli, P., Dobbs, C. L., & Scott, J. (2012). Mastering Academic Language: Organization And Stance In The Persuasive Writing Of High School Students. Written Communication, 30(1), 36-62.

Wood, N. V. (2001). Perspectives on argument. (Third Edition). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Zainuddin, S. Z., & Rafik-Galea, S. (2016). Effects of Training In The Use Of Toulmin’s Model On ESL Students’ Argumentative Writing And Critical Thinking Ability. Malaysian Journal of Languages and Linguistics, 5(2), 112-131.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-30

How to Cite

Abdul Aziz, F. I., & Ahmad, U. K. (2017). Persuasive Writing: How Students Argue. Sains Humanika, 9(4-2). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n4-2.1356