A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Learning Engagement in Educational Settings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v16n3.2126Keywords:
Systematic literature review, learning engagement, empirical researchAbstract
Learning engagement is a crucial aspect of educational success, yet its complexities remain a subject of ongoing investigation. This systematic literature review presents a comprehensive synthesis of empirical research on learning engagement, meticulously curated through a thorough review process. Drawing upon a diverse array of scholarly works, this review delves into the antecedents and outcomes of learning engagement, shedding light on its multifaceted nature. Various measurement methods, including surveys, interviews, and observation, are explored, emphasizing the diverse approaches to understanding and assessing engagement. Key findings underscore the pivotal roles of intrinsic motivation, perceived value, self-regulation, and social support in nurturing learning engagement among learners. Moreover, methodological considerations are critically examined, paving the way for future research avenues aimed at deepening our comprehension of learning engagement dynamics within diverse educational contexts. This review serves as a valuable resource for educators, researchers, and policymakers seeking to enhance student engagement and academic outcomes.
References
Bandura, A. (2000). Self-efficacy: The foundation of agency. Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of August Flammer, 16.
Bergdahl, N., et al. (2020). Engagement, disengagement and performance when learning with technologies in upper secondary school. Computers & Education, 149, 103783.
Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1).
Boulton, C. A., et al. (2019). Student engagement and wellbeing over time at a higher education institution. PloS one, 14(11), e0225770.
Casey, D., et al. (2011). Use of peer assessment as a student engagement strategy in nurse education. Nursing & health sciences, 13(4), 514-520.
Chen, C.-H., & Chiu, C.-H. (2016). Employing intergroup competition in multitouch design-based learning to foster student engagement, learning achievement, and creativity. Computers & Education, 103, 99-113.
Chen, M. R. A., et al. (2019). A reflective thinking‐promoting approach to enhancing graduate students' flipped learning engagement, participation behaviors, reflective thinking and project learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2288-2307.
D'Mello, S., et al. (2017). Advanced, analytic, automated (AAA) measurement of engagement during learning. Educational psychologist, 52(2), 104-123.
Darnell, D. K., & Krieg, P. A. (2019). Student engagement, assessed using heart rate, shows no reset following active learning sessions in lectures. PloS one, 14(12), e0225709.
De Carolis, B., et al. (2019). “Engaged Faces”: Measuring and Monitoring Student Engagement from Face and Gaze Behavior. Paper presented at the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence-Companion Volume.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of research in personality, 19(2), 109-134.
Dewan, M. A. A., et al. (2018). A deep learning approach to detecting engagement of online learners. Paper presented at the 2018 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI).
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2021). Teaching and researching motivation.
Dubbaka, A., & Gopalan, A. (2020). Detecting learner engagement in MOOCs using automatic facial expression recognition. Paper presented at the 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).
Fatawi, I., et al. (2020). Effect of online-based concept map on student engagement and learning outcome. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 18(3), 42-56.
Filsecker, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2014). A multilevel analysis of the effects of external rewards on elementary students' motivation, engagement and learning in an educational game. Computers & Education, 75, 136-148.
Flynn, B. B., et al. (1990). Empirical research methods in operations management. Journal of operations management, 9(2), 250-284.
Foldnes, N. (2016). The flipped classroom and cooperative learning: Evidence from a randomised experiment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 39-49.
Fredricks, J. A., et al. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109.
Göksün, D. O., & Gürsoy, G. (2019). Comparing success and engagement in gamified learning experiences via Kahoot and Quizizz. Computers & Education, 135, 15-29.
Goldberg, B. S., et al. (2011). Predicting learner engagement during well-defined and ill-defined computer-based intercultural interactions. Paper presented at the Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction: 4th International Conference, ACII 2011, Memphis, TN, USA, October 9–12, 2011, Proceedings, Part I 4.
Gu, J., et al. (2022). Promoting Pre-service Teacher Students’ Learning Engagement: Design-Based Research in a Flipped Classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 810275.
Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320-341.
Hu, P. J.-H., & Hui, W. (2012). Examining the role of learning engagement in technology-mediated learning and its effects on learning effectiveness and satisfaction. Decision support systems, 53(4), 782-792.
Junco, R., et al. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of computer assisted learning, 27(2), 119-132.
Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in massive open online courses (MOOCS). Computers & Education, 122, 9-22.
Katsioudi, G., & Kostareli, E. (2021). A Sandwich‐model experiment with personal response systems on epigenetics: insights into learning gain, student engagement and satisfaction. FEBS Open bio, 11(5), 1282-1298.
Ke, F., et al. (2016). Game‐based learning engagement: A theory‐and data‐driven exploration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1183-1201.
Khaleel, F. L., et al. (2020). The impact of gamification on students learning engagement. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 10(5), 4965.
Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100450.
Kraft, M. A., & Dougherty, S. M. (2013). The effect of teacher–family communication on student engagement: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(3), 199-222.
Lackmann, S., et al. (2021). The influence of video format on engagement and performance in online learning. Brain Sciences, 11(2), 128.
Li, Y., et al. (2022). An experiential learning-based virtual reality approach to foster students’ vocabulary acquisition and learning engagement in English for geography. Sustainability, 14(22), 15359.
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2021). Developing a flipped learning approach to support student engagement: A design‐based research of secondary school mathematics teaching. Journal of computer assisted learning, 37(1), 142-157.
Ma, J., et al. (2015). Examining the necessary condition for engagement in an online learning environment based on learning analytics approach: The role of the instructor. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 26-34.
Ma, X., et al. (2021). Automatic student engagement in online learning environment based on neural turing machine. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(3), 107-111.
Mello, L. V. (2016). Fostering postgraduate student engagement: online resources supporting self-directed learning in a diverse cohort. Research in Learning Technology, 24.
Motz, B. A., et al. (2017). A dissociation between engagement and learning: Enthusiastic instructions fail to reliably improve performance on a memory task. PloS one, 12(7), e0181775.
Neugebauer, J., et al. (2016). When being worse helps: The influence of upward social comparisons and knowledge awareness on learner engagement and learning in peer-to-peer knowledge exchange. Learning and Instruction, 44, 41-52.
Ninaus, M., et al. (2019). Increased emotional engagement in game-based learning–A machine learning approach on facial emotion detection data. Computers & Education, 142, 103641.
Nkhoma, M., et al. (2014). Examining the mediating role of learning engagement, learning process and learning experience on the learning outcomes through localized real case studies. Education+ Training, 56(4), 287-302.
Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International journal of surgery, 88, 105906.
Pellas, N. (2014). The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of Second Life. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 157-170.
Pellas, N., & Kazanidis, I. (2015). On the value of Second Life for students’ engagement in blended and online courses: A comparative study from the Higher Education in Greece. Education and Information Technologies, 20, 445-466.
Phan, T., et al. (2016). Students’ patterns of engagement and course performance in a Massive Open Online Course. Computers & Education, 95, 36-44.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 92(3), 544.
Reeve, J., et al. (2022). When students show some initiative: Two experiments on the benefits of greater agentic engagement. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101564.
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3-19): Springer.
Ribeiro, L. M. C., et al. (2019). Effects of deliberate reflection on students’ engagement in learning and learning outcomes. Medical Education, 53(4), 390-397.
Scogin, S. C., & Stuessy, C. L. (2015). Encouraging greater student inquiry engagement in science through motivational support by online scientist‐mentors. Science Education, 99(2), 312-349.
Shi, Y., et al. (2018). The effects of smart classroom-based instruction on college students’ learning engagement and internet self-efficacy. Paper presented at the Blended Learning. Enhancing Learning Success: 11th International Conference, ICBL 2018, Osaka, Japan, July 31-August 2, 2018, Proceedings 11.
Sinha, S., et al. (2015). Collaborative group engagement in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10, 273-307.
Smiderle, R., et al. (2020). The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1-11.
Soffer, T., & Cohen, A. (2019). Students' engagement characteristics predict success and completion of online courses. Journal of computer assisted learning, 35(3), 378-389.
Steen-Utheim, A. T., & Foldnes, N. (2018). A qualitative investigation of student engagement in a flipped classroom. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(3), 307-324.
Stott, P. (2016). The perils of a lack of student engagement: Reflections of a “lonely, brave, and rather exposed” online instructor. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 51-64.
Sullivan, S., et al. (2017). Middle school students’ learning of mechanics concepts through engagement in different sequences of physical and virtual experiments. International Journal of Science Education, 39(12), 1573-1600.
Sun, C., et al. (2020). A Study on the influence of scene reality of VR environment on English learners' learning engagement and learning effectiveness. Paper presented at the 2020 IEEE 2nd international Conference on computer Science and educational informatization (CSEI).
Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self‐efficacy and self‐regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191-204.
Sung, Y.-T., et al. (2010). Designing an electronic guidebook for learning engagement in a museum of history. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 74-83.
Talan, T., & Gulsecen, S. (2019). The effect of a flipped classroom on students’ achievements, academic engagement and satisfaction levels. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(4), 31-60.
Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The higher education academy, 11(1), 1-15.
Tsai, M.-C., et al. (2020). Exploring the effects of web-mediated activity-based learning and meaningful learning on improving students’ learning effects, learning engagement, and academic motivation. Universal Access in the Information Society, 19, 783-798.
Walji, S., et al. (2016). Learning through engagement: MOOCs as an emergent form of provision. Distance Education, 37(2), 208-223.
Wang, M.-T., et al. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of school psychology, 49(4), 465-480.
Ward, T., et al. (2016). Using virtual online simulations in S econd L ife® to engage undergraduate psychology students with employability issues. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 918-931.
Xie, K., et al. (2020). A person-centered approach to examining high-school students’ motivation, engagement and academic performance. Contemporary educational psychology, 62, 101877.
Xu, B., et al. (2020). Effects of teacher role on student engagement in WeChat-Based online discussion learning. Computers & Education, 157, 103956.
Yang, Y.-F. (2011). Engaging students in an online situated language learning environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 181-198.
Zhang, X., et al. (2019). Learning analytics in collaborative learning supported by Slack: From the perspective of engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 625-633.
Zhang, Z., et al. (2020). Data-driven online learning engagement detection via facial expression and mouse behavior recognition technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 63-86.
