Developing a New Model for Achieving Flow State in STEAM Education: A Mixed-Method Investigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v16n3.2163Keywords:
Flow state, STEAM, ITU, IGU, ASMR, Educational Technology, Gamification.Abstract
The flow state is a mental state in which a person is fully immersed in an activity and experiences a sense of energized focus, full involvement, and enjoyment. It is a highly desirable state for learning, as it allows students to be more engaged and productive. However, achieving the flow state can be challenging, and there is no single method guaranteed to achieve all the conditions of this state. Additionally, this study argues that achieving the flow state is advantageous in STEAM education because it has the potential to increase student engagement and motivation, improve learning outcomes, promote creativity and problem-solving skills, and develop 21st-century skills such as collaboration and critical thinking. Therefore, this study aims to develop a new framework for achieving the flow state in STEAM education by investigating the implementation of a combined approach using impactful technology (ITU) and gamification (IGU). The framework combines impactful technology use (ITU) and impactful gamification use (IGU) to create activities that are challenging, have clear goals, provide immediate feedback, and promote action-awareness merging. A concurrent triangulation mixed-methodology research design was used, with data collected from teachers, students, and parents through questionnaires, interviews, and observations. The researcher used purposive sampling to determine the sample, which consisted of eighty-nine teachers, ten students, ten parents, and ten lesson observations. The study is significant because it is the first to propose a new model for achieving the flow state in STEAM education. The findings were used to develop the New Combined Flow Framework (NCFF), which supports achieving the conditions for the flow state in STEAM learning through the combined use of ITU and IGU. This new framework can be used by education professionals to practically achieve the flow state in STEAM classes. By understanding how to achieve the flow state, educators can create more engaging and effective learning experiences for their students, potentially revolutionizing STEAM education and making it more accessible to all students.
References
Albuquerque, J., Bittencourt, I. I., Coelho, J. A. P. M., & Silva, A. P. (2017). Does gender stereotype threat in gamified educational environments cause anxiety? An experimental study. Computers & Education, 115, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.005
Bakhshaei, M. (2019). Sharing Tools for Measuring Impactful Technology Use. Retrieved November 13, 2021, from Digital Promise website: https://digitalpromise.org/2019/11/19/sharing-tools-for-measuring-impactful-technology-use/
Buchanan, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Design Issues, 8(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511458
Buckley, P., & Doyle, E. (2017). Individualising gamification: An investigation of the impact of learning styles and personality traits on the efficacy of gamification using a prediction market. Computers & Education, 106, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.009
Chou, Y.-K. (2014). Actionable gamification : beyond points, badges, and leaderboards. United States: Octalysis Group.
Cohen, S. (2018). Study finds STEM courses cost more than humanities, social sciences – The Daily Free Press. Retrieved December 20, 2022, from Daily Free Press website.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. In Google Books. Jossey-Bass Publishers. Retrieved from https://books.google.ae/books/about/Beyond_Boredom_and_Anxiety.html?id=afdGAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement With Everyday Life. Retrieved from ResearchGate website. Retrieved date: 28/3/24
Dworkin, S. L. (2012). Sample Size Policy for Qualitative Studies Using In-Depth Interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(6), 1319–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6
Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2017). Chapter 18: Exploratory-Sequential Approach. In An Applied Guide to Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781071802779 Retrieved date: 28/3/24
Hamash, M., & Mohamed, H. (2023a). Identifying the Level of Teacher’s Maturity in the Impactful Gamification Use (IGU) in ABU Dhabi Public Schools. 3rd International Conference on Educational Technology and Online Learning ICETOL 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10830279
Hamash, M., & Mohamed, H. (2023b). Identifying the Level of Teacher’s Maturity in the Impactful Technology Use (ITU) in Abu Dhabi Public Schools. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal, 7(2), 60–71.
Ferlazzo, L. (2013, March 26). Response: “Flow” In The Classroom. Education Week.
Golland, B. (2015). Flow in STEM Education. Retrieved December 25, 2022, from Barish Golland website.
Guo, Z., Xiao, L., Van Toorn, C., Lai, Y., & Seo, C. (2016). Promoting online learners’ continuance intention: An integrated flow framework. Information & Management, 53(2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.10.010
Khine, M. S., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). STEAM Education (M. S. Khine & S. Areepattamannil, Eds.). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1
Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1)., 13-24
Metz, A., & Bartley, L. (2012). Active Implementation Frameworks for Program Success: How to Use Implementation Science to Improve Outcomes for Children. Zero to Three (J), 32(4), 11–18. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1002634
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. (1990). Flow : The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper [And] Row.
Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The Effect of Perceived Challenges and Skills on the Quality of Subjective Experience. Journal of Personality, 64(2), 275–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00512.x
Oliveira, W., Toda, A. M., Palomino, P. T., Shi, L., Isotani, S., Bittencourt, I. I., & Vassileva, J. (2020). Does Tailoring Gamified Educational Systems Matter? The Impact on Students’ Flow Experience. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (978-0-9981331-3-3). Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10125/63891 Retrieved date: 28/3/24
Perttula, A., Kiili, K., Lindstedt, A., & Tuomi, P. (2017). Flow experience in game based learning – a systematic literature review. International Journal of Serious Games, 4(1), 57-72 https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v4i1.151
Sharek, D., & Wiebe, E. (2011). Using Flow Theory to Design Video Games as Experimental Stimuli. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 1520–1524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551316
Shetty, S. (2022). Determining Sample Size For Qualitative Research: What Is The Magical Number? | InterQ Research. Retrieved from interq-research.com website: Retrieved date: 28/3/24
Tongco, Ma. D. C. (2007). Purposive Sampling as a Tool for Informant Selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147-158.
Vann, S. W., & Tawfik, A. A. (2020). Flow Theory and Learning Experience Design in Gamified Learning Environments. In edtechbooks.org. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/ux/flow_theory_and_lxd Retrieved date: 28/3/24
Wang, L.-H., Chen, B., Hwang, G.-J., Guan, J.-Q., & Wang, Y.-Q. (2022). Effects of digital game-based STEM education on students’ learning achievement: a meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1,-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00344-0
Wang, Y., Rajan, P., Sankar, C. S., & Raju, P. K. (2017). Let Them Play: The Impact of Mechanics and Dynamics of a Serious Game on Student Perceptions of Learning Engagement. IEEE Transactions On Learning Technologies, 10.
Whalen, S. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Putting Flow Theory into Educational Practice: The Key School’s Flow Activities Room. Report to the Benton Center for Curriculum and Instruction, University of Chicago. In ERIC. Report to the Benton Center For Curriculum and Instruction University of Chicago. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED338381 Retrieved date: 28/3/24 3(3), 82-96
Woodard, J. (2019, August 20). Rotten STEM: How Technology Corrupts Education., American Affairs Journal 3(3), 82-96 https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2019/08/rotten-stem-how-technology-corrupts-education/ Retrieved March 20, 2021
