Invertible Octopus as a Tool to Promote Fast Thinking in Impromptu Speaking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v18n2.2248Keywords:
fast-thinking, game, impromptu speech, speaking skills.Abstract
Having students extemporize as a classroom activity to prepare them for impromptu speech may be daunting. Their reluctance to volunteer or to step forward may cost time, thus giving everyone the opportunity to practice impromptu speech may be hampered. An action research was conducted to view and understand students’ perspectives of a game called Invertible Octopus Game as an intervention to help them hone their fast-thinking skills based on Dual Process Theory Type 1. The game was designed with a closer look into Cognitive Load Theory, and 30 medical students were selected for the research. Data were gathered via a short questionnaire, interviews and classroom observations to gain insights into the effectiveness of the game in activating students’ fast thinking skills as a preparation for impromptu task. The students reported that this activity helped them prepare for the impromptu task and 96% of them agreed that the game invoked their fast-thinking skills. 92% of the students hoped to have such a game in the future for the speaking class. The study concluded that the game managed to work as a facilitating tool for the impromptu task and had the potential to develop students’ fast-thinking skills. Nevertheless, future and in-depth research is needed to further develop the framework and to gain empirical data for the effectiveness of the Invertible Octopus Game.
References
Aini Faridah Azizul, Munirah Izzati Ismai, Pishaza Othman, & Wan AininSofiya Wan Azlan. (2021). The Potential of Online Bulletin Platforms for LanguageTeaching in Classrooms. ESTEEM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(1), 1–14. https://ejssh.uitm.edu.my/images/Vol5April2021/EJSSH_Full_Version_VOL5_NO1_APRIL_2021.pdf
Alqarni, A. (2025). Network Dynamics and the Impact of Gamification on Computational Thinking and Visual Programming in Primary Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251337628
Badrasawi, K. J. I., Abu Kassim, N. L., Zubairi, A. M., Md Johar, E., & Sidik, S. S. (2021). English Language Speaking Anxiety, Self-Confidence and Perceived Ability among Science and Technology Undergraduate Students: A Rasch Analysis. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(S3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.s3.16
Bihu, R. (2020). Using unstructured interviews in educational and social science research: The process, opportunity and difficulty. Global Scientific Journals, GSJ, 8(10), 712-721
Cecchini, G., DePass, M., Emre Baspinar, Andujar, M., Surabhi Ramawat, Pani, P., Ferraina, S., Alain Destexhe, Rubén Moreno-Bote, & Cos, I. (2024). Cognitive mechanisms of learning in sequential decision-making under uncertainty: an experimental and theoretical approach. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 18, 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1399394
Chauhan, R. S. (2019). Unstructured interviews: Are They Really All That bad? Human Resource Development International, 25(4), 474–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2019.1603019
Chen, O., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2023). A Cognitive Load Theory Approach to Defining and Measuring Task Complexity Through Element Interactivity. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09782-w
Clark, J., Porath, S., Thiele, J., & Jobe, M. (2020). Action Research. NPP EBooks. https://newprairiepress.org/ebooks/34
ElAdl, A. M. (2025). The Cognitive Agility and its relationship to Self-Regulation and Self-efficacy among pre-service Teachers. Al-Majalla al-Misriyya li-l-Dirasat al-Nafsiyya (The Egyptian Journal of Psychological Studies) 35(127).DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejcj.2025.422850
Faber, E., Mary, Walter, Bruinink, L. J., Marije Hogeveen, & Merriënboer, van. (2024). Effects of adaptive scaffolding on performance, cognitive load and engagement in game-based learning: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 24(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05698-3
Fell, J. (2022). What is mind blanking: A conceptual clarification. European Journal of Neuroscience. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15782
Ghafar, Z. (2023). The influence of selfconfidence on English language learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Applied Educational Research (IJAER), 1(1), 55–68.
Grayot, J. D. (2020). Dual Process Theories in Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics: a Critical Review. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 11(1), 105–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-019-00446-9
Grayot, J. D., Beck, L., & Thijs Heijmeskamp. (2024). Dual process theory and the challenges of functional individuation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 23(2), 485-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-024-10000-3
Griffee, D. (2005). Research Tips: Interview Data Collection. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ718580.pdf Retrieved: December 15, 2025.
Guvey, E. (2021). Impromptu Speaking Skills of Pre-service Teachers. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(2), 261–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.2.261
Halupa, C. M. (2020). Action Research in Practice-Based Doctoral Programs. Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer and Management Book Series, 137–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6664-0.ch007
Hbash, A. A. W. (2023). The Cognitive agility and its relationship to psychological fluency and psychological Tranquility among a sample of Yemeni youth. مMajallat al-'Ulum al-Tarbawiyya wa-l-Insaniyya (Journal of Educational and Humanitarian Sciences), 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33193/jeahs.22.2023.345
Huang, B., Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2018). Investigating the Effects of gamification-enhanced Flipped Learning on Undergraduate Students’ Behavioral and Cognitive Engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495653
Jalleh, C. M., Mahfoodh, O. H. A., & Singh, M. K. M. (2021). Oral Communication Apprehension among Japanese EFL International Students in a Language Immersion Program in Malaysia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 155–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14210a
Jonathan, B. T. E. (2017). Dual-process theories. 151–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315725697-9
Kellar, K., & Heron, P. (2025). Distinguishing between students’ conceptual understanding and reasoning approaches: An application of dual-process theories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.21.010141
Khalil, E. L., & Amin, A. (2022). The parallelism of cognitive economy and physiological economy: A rationality-based dual process theory. Current Psychology. 42, 24148-24162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03554-5
Kryjevskaia, M., Stetzer, M. R., Lindsey, B. A., McInerny, A., Heron, P. R. L., & Boudreaux, A. (2020). Designing research-based instructional materials that leverage dual-process theories of reasoning: Insights from testing one specific, theory-driven intervention. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.16.020140
LaCroix, J. M., Baggett, C. M. R., Lee-Tauler, S. Y., Carter, S. P., Vileta, S., Neff, L. C. (Retired) D. R., Finton, L. B., Bottema, M. G. S. J., Bowling, S. M. (Retired) E., Hosack, T. S. M. E., Grammer, J., Stivers, M., Darmour, C. A., & Ghahramanlou-Holloway, M. (2021). Special Operations Cognitive Agility Training (SOCAT) for Special Operations Forces and spouses. Military Psychology, 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2021.1981709
Langerock, N., Oberauer, K., Throm, E., & Vergauwe, E. (2025). The cognitive load effect in working memory: Refreshing the empirical landscape, removing outdated explanations. Journal of Memory and Language, 140(104558), 104558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2024.104558
Li, J., Wang, C., Yao Hong Zhao, & Li, Y. (2023). Boosting Learners’ Confidence in Learning English: Can Self‐Efficacy‐Based Intervention Make a Difference?. TESOL Quarterly. 58(4), 1518-1547 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3292
Lin, J. C., Lokhande, A., Margo, C. E., & Greenberg, P. B. (2022). Best practices for interviewing applicants for medical school admissions: a systematic review. Perspectives on Medical Education, 11(5), 239–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-022-00726-8
Maher, K. (2020). Observing Anxiety in the Foreign Language Classroom: Student Silence and Nonverbal Cues. Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 2, 116–141. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1352564.pdf Retrieved: December 21, 2025
Matlák, J., Fridvalszki, M., Kóródi, V., Szamosszegi, G., Pólyán, E., Kovács, B., Kolozs, B., Langmár, G., & Rácz, L. (2024). Relationship Between Cognitive Functions and Agility Performance in Elite Young Male Soccer Players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 38(1), 116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004644
Messikh, D. (2020). A Systematic Review of the Outcomes of Using Action Research in Education – AWEJ. 11(1), 482-488 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.32
Paonessa, M. (2025). How Creativity Unlocks Innovation, Collaboration, and Mental Agility. Public Humanities, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/pub.2025.3
Puri, B., Mushtaque, I., Fang, S., Chenhe, G., & Younas, A. (2025). The impact of mobile-based language learning on speaking and learning anxiety, engagement and achievement in Chinese language learning: The mediating role of cognitive load. Acta Psychologica, 259, 105400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105400
Qiao, S., Yeung, S. S., Zainuddin, Z., Ng, D. T. K., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Examining the effects of mixed and non‐digital gamification on students’ learning performance, cognitive engagement and course satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(1), 394-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13249
Rajendran, M., Ray, M., Ilangovan, A., Chokkalingam, V. K., & Singh, A. B. (2024). Commercial Video Games and English Language Skills Development: A Systematic Review. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 45, 57–85 DOI:.https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.45.04
Ruler, B. van. (2021). Communication Planning: Agility is a Game Changer in Strategy Development. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 15(2), 113–125. Tandfonline. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2021.1898117
Saez-Zevallos, N. S., Cunza-Aranzábal, D. F., Abanto-Ramírez, C. D., & Danitza Elfi Montalvo-Apolín. (2025). Relationship between English self-efficacy and language learning strategies among Peruvian university students: the mediating role of academic self-efficacy. Frontiers in Education, 10, , 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1668300
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2019). The Gamification of Learning: a Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
Sekkal, K. (2020). Impromptu Speech for Strengthening Tertiary Students’ Oral Communication Competencies in Large Classes. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(3), 574–581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.53.2
Shih, P.-C., África Pérez-Santiago, Peña, D., Wazne, D., & Román, S. (2025). Jumping to Conclusions: Mechanisms of Cognitive Control in Decision-Making Under Uncertainty. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 226–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020226
Stringer, E. T., & Aragorn, A. O. (2020). Action Research. Sage Publications Inc.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Szulewski, A., Howes, D., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2020). From Theory to Practice: The Application of Cognitive Load Theory to the Practice of Medicine. Academic Medicine, 96(1), 24–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003524
Teferra, B. G., Borwein, S., DeSouza, D. D., Simpson, W., Rheault, L., & Rose, J. (2022). Acoustic and Linguistic Features of Impromptu Speech and Their Association With Anxiety: Validation Study. JMIR Mental Health, 9(7), e36828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/36828
Van Nooijen, C., de Koning, B., Bramer, W. M., Isahakyan, A., Asoodar, M., Kok, E., Merrienboer, van, & Paas, F. (2024). A Cognitive Load Theory Approach to Understanding Expert Scaffolding of Visual Problem-Solving Tasks: A Scoping Review. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 1-42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09848-3
Wang, Y., & Sun, P. P. (2024). Development and validation of scales for speaking self-efficacy: Constructs, sources, and relations. PLOS ONE, 19(1), e0297517–e0297517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297517
Wardani, W. K. (2018). The Characteristics of Anxious Students in Speaking Class. Journal of Foreign Languange Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 60-73 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.3230
Wirdayana, W., & Kultsum, U. (2023). The Effectiveness Of Impromptu Speaking Method On Students’ Speaking Of Introducing Oneself And Others. JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(3), 1830–1841.
Xiao, Y., & Khe, F. H. (2024). Personalised gamification enhances student participation but produces mixed effects on emotional and cognitive engagements: a systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2299977
Yong, V., Saccomandi, A., Chin, K., Lutzow, L., DuCette, J. P., Bueno, R., & Erkmen, C. P. (2024). Impromptu Speaking: Teaching an Essential Leadership Skill. Journal of Surgical Education, 81(12), 103313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.103313
Yuan, J., Huang, M., & Shi, X. (2024). Correlation Between English Speaking Self-Efficacy and Proficiency: A Case Study of English Majors at Modern College of Northwest University. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 8(3), 88–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/05z8db75
Zonca, J., Mauro, L. D., Rustichini, A., Polonio, L., & Reverberi, C. (2025). Learning in Interactive Decision-Making: The Interplay Between Cognitive Abilities and the Strategic Environment. Open Mind, 9, 210–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00186
