Beyond Cognitive Offloading: AI Reliance and Perceived Higher-Order Thinking Skills among UNIMAS Undergraduates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v18n3.2315Keywords:
artificial intelligence reliance, cognitive offloading, higher-order thinking skills, STEM and non-STEM, Malaysian higher educationAbstract
The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in higher education has prompted widespread concern that student reliance on these technologies may erode higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). However, much of the existing evidence draws on Western contexts and relies on deficit-oriented assumptions about AI use. This mixed-methods study investigates the relationship between reliance on AI and perceived higher-order thinking skills among undergraduate students at Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), with a comparative focus on STEM and non-STEM disciplines. Quantitative data were collected from 100 undergraduates using a structured questionnaire, while qualitative data were collected from six purposively selected participants through semi-structured interviews. Contrary to the dominant cognitive offloading narrative, a strong positive correlation was found between AI reliance and self-reported engagement in higher-order thinking (ρ = .577, p < .001), with no significant disciplinary differences. Qualitative findings revealed that students approached AI with verification strategies, critical awareness, and reflective judgement rather than passive dependence. These results suggest that the relationship between AI use and cognitive engagement is more nuanced than prevailing literature implies, and that contextual factors such as evaluative habits and pedagogical culture may be more influential than disciplinary background in shaping how students think with AI
References
Adams, D., & Chuah, K. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based tools in research writing: Current trends and future potentials. Artificial intelligence in higher education, 169-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003184157
Amdan, M. A. B., Janius, N., Saidin, M. S. B., & Kasdiah, A. H. B. (2025). Impact of artificial intelligence in TVET and STEM education among higher learning students in Malaysia. Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 2(1), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v2i1.15
Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing writing, 57, 100745.
Bowden, A., Fox-Rushby, J., Anyandieka, L., & Wanjau, J. (2002). Methods for pre-testing and piloting survey questions: Illustrations from the KENQOL survey of health-related quality of life. Health Policy and Planning, 17(3), 322–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/17.3.322
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Çela, E., Fonkam, M., & Potluri, R. M. (2024). Risks of AI-assisted learning on student critical thinking: A case study of Albania. International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management, 12(1), 2–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJRCM.350185
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Chuah, K. M., & Sumintono, B. (2024). University student readiness and academic integrity in using ChatGPT and AI tools for assessments. In Digital assessment in higher education: Navigating and researching challenges and opportunities (pp. 69-88). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-6136-4_4
Essien, A., Bukoye, O. T., O’Dea, X., & Kremantzis, M. (2024). The influence of AI text generators on critical thinking skills in UK business schools. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 865–882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2316881
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
Guo, Z., Wu, Y., Hartline, J. D., & Hullman, J. (2024). A decision theoretic framework for measuring AI reliance. Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’24) (pp. 1–17). Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658901
Hasin, H., Jamil, A., Mahat, Z., Sehat, R., & Fauzihardani, E. (2025). The role of AI-assisted learning tools in higher education: Balancing efficiency, critical thinking and academic integrity. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 15(1), 36–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v15i1%28s%29.4462
Huesca, G., Martínez-Treviño, Y., Molina-Espinosa, J. M., Sanromán-Calleros, A. R., Martínez-Román, R., Cendejas-Castro, E. A., & Bustos, R. (2024). Effectiveness of using ChatGPT as a tool to strengthen benefits of the flipped learning strategy. Education Sciences, 14(6), 660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060660
Khan, N., Sarwar, A., Chen, T. B., & Khan, S. (2022). Connecting digital literacy in higher education to the 21st century workforce. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 14(1), 46-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2022.14.004
Kofahi, M. A., & Husain, A. J. A. (2025). ChatGPT for operating systems: Higher-order thinking in focus. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 24, 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/5382
Kosar, T., Ostojic, D., Liu, D. Y., & Mernik, M. (2024). Computer science education in ChatGPT era: Experiences from an experiment in a programming course for novice programmers. Mathematics, 12(5), 629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math12050629
Lee, Y., Ahn, H., & Jo, H. (2026). Exploring the drivers and outcomes of generative AI usage: the role of metacognition. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 42(4), 2098-2120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2526592
Li, Y., Castulo, N. J., & Xu, X. (2025). Embracing or rejecting AI? A mixed-method study on undergraduate students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence at a private university in China. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1505856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1505856
Lijie, H., Yusoff, S. M., & Marzaini, A. F. (2024). Influence of AI-driven educational tools on critical thinking dispositions among university students in Malaysia: A study of key factors and correlations. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 8029–8053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13150-8
Limna, P., Jakwatanatham, S., Siripipattanakul, S., Kaewpuang, P., & Sriboonruang, P. (2022). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education during the digital era. Advanced Knowledge for Executives, 1(1), 1–9.
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (2025). Malaysia Higher Education Blueprint (2026-2035). Ministry of Higher Education.
Morse, J. M. (2016). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Routledge.
Obenza, B. N., Salvahan, A., Rios, A. N., Solo, A., Alburo, R. A., & Gabila, R. J. (2024). University students’ perception and use of ChatGPT: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education. International Journal of Human Computing Studies, 5(12), 5–18.
Parviz, M. (2024). AI in education: Comparative perspectives from STEM and non-STEM instructors. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100190
Pennycook, G., Ross, R. M., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2017). Dunning–Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 24(6), 1774-1784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7
Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002
Selvanathan, B., & Narayanan, S. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education Malaysia: An opportunity or threat to the education system? International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(3), 965–974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i3/21455
Shakil, E., & Siddiq, S. (2024). ESL teachers’ perceptions about ChatGPT as a threat to analytical writing abilities of ESL learners at graduate level. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 8(1), 115–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2024(8-I)10
Valeri, F., Nilsson, P., & Cederqvist, A. (2025). Exploring students’ experience of ChatGPT in STEM education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100360
Wilson, D. M., & Narasuman, S. (2020). Investigating teachers’ implementation and strategies on higher order thinking skills in school based assessment instruments. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(1), 62–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i1.8991
Yatani, K., Sramek, Z., & Yang, C. (2024). AI as extraherics: Fostering higher-order thinking skills in human–AI interaction. arXiv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.09218
Zhou, X., Zhang, J., & Chan, C. (2024). Unveiling students’ experiences and perceptions of artificial intelligence usage in higher education. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6), 894–897.
