Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberkesanan Amali Kerja Kayu dari Perspektif Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Vokasional di Provinsi Acheh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-5.1188Keywords:
Effectiveness practice, wood work, workshop environmentAbstract
This study aims to identify factors that influence the effectiveness of practical woodworking and determine the effectiveness of practical woodworking from the perspective of students of secondary vocational schools in the province of Aceh. Factors studied were the workshop equipment, safety workshops, teaching skills, the workshop environment and student interest. This study was designed to investigate the significant differences concerning factors woodworking practical effectiveness based on demographic factors. A total of 130 respondents were randomly selected from six vocational schools in the province of Aceh. The instrument consists of a set of questionnaire consisting of 49 items and distributed to second level students. Data analysis using the two types of statistics, namely descriptive statistics and statistical inference. The results showed no significant difference between factors woodworking practical effectiveness based on demographic factors except the income level of parents and the parents of the respondents work. The results of multiple linear regression analysis stepwise method found that only four factors (environmental factors workshops, the students interest, the skills of teachers and workshop equipment factors) that affect the practical effectiveness of woodworking with the correlation coefficient R = 0.779. This shows there is a significant effect of the four factors, the effectiveness of practical woodworking, accounting for 60.6% (R2 = 0.606) changes in the variance in effectiveness of hands-on woodworking, and between the four factors, the workshop environment is the factor that most influences the effectiveness practical woodworking by contributing 43.3% (R2 = 0.433) of the variance in effectiveness of practical woodworking. The main implication of this study is the need for attention from the authorities to be more serious in efforts to improve the facilities and infrastructure in the workshop as well as security issues in practical workshops so that the effectiveness of the woodwork to be more robust.
References
A. Halim Ali, R. A. S. Raja Hassan dan Z. Zain. (2005). Pak Lah Dalam Pendidikan. Malaysia: Penerbit UPSI.
A. Fuad Md. Idris. (1995). Kepentingan Amalan Keselamatan di Bengkel Kimpalan dan Fabrikasi Logam di Sekolah Menengah Vokasional Kuala Terengganu, Kemaman dan Besut Negeri Terengganu: Satu Tinjauan. Universiti TeknologiMalaysia:Tesis Sarjana Muda.
A. Yahaya & Wong. (2007). Keberkesanan Proses Pengajaran di Kalangan Guru Kejuruteraan Awam di Sekolah Menengah Teknik. Isu-isu Pendidikan Teknikal Vokasional, Skudai: Penerbit UTM.
Berita dalam akhbar Serambi Indonesia. Banda Acheh: 17 Februari 2013.
C. Teddlie, D. Reynolds. (2000). The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research. Falmer Press, Taylor&Francis Group : London&Newyork.
J. W. Creswell. (2002) Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (Second ed.). New Jersey, USA : Pearson-Merril Prentice Hall.
Direktorat Pembinaan SMK. (2014). Data Pokok SMK. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional
Direktorat Pembinaan SMK. (2008). Petunjuk Teknis Penilaian Hasil Belajar SMK. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
J. Donnelly. (1995). Curriculum Development in Science: The Lessons of Sc1. School Science Review, 76 (277), 95 – 103.
E. Loganathan. (2008). Amalan Peraturan Keselamatan Bengkel dalam Kalangan Pelajar di Sebuah Institut Kemahiran Mara. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda.
G. S. Morrison. (2000). Teaching in America. 2nd edition, Needham Heights: Ally and Bacon.
I. Irmayanti. (2008). Kesediaan Pelajar Dalam Pelaksanaan Amali KejuruteraanAwam Di Politeknik. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana.
K. A. Khan,. dan D. J Vickery. (1970). “The Design of Workshop For Asian Second Level Schoolsâ€. Colombo UNESCO.
K. Kelley, B. Clark, & B. Brown. (2003). Methodology Matters : Good Practice in The Conduct and Reporting of Survey Research dalam International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 15(3), 261 – 266,
L. D. Crow, A. Crow (1983). Psikologi Pendidikan untuk Perguruan. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur.
M. R. Mohd Said & R. Zahari. (2011). Kajian Aplikasi Ergonomik Terhadap Pelajar Ketika Melakukan Kerja-Kerja Amali Bengkel Di Kalangan pelajar-Pelajar 4 SPH PKPG Fakulti Pendidikan UTM. Journal of Technical, Vocational & Engineering Educational, 3, 116-131. ISSN: 2231-7376
M. Pavlova. (2009). Technology and Vocational Education for Sustainable Development: Empowering Individuals for the future. Griffith University, Australia: Springer.
M. Carnoy. (1999). Fundamentals of Educational Planning, Globalization and Educational reform: What Planner Need to Know. Paris: UNESCO.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Nombor 29 Tahun 1990.
Peraturan Pemerintah. (1991). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Nombor 73 Tahun 1991.
R. Musthapa. (2012). Sekolah Vokasional di Malaysia dan Sekolah Kejuruan di Indonesia. Dalam Prosiding International Seminar Educational Comparative in Competency Based Curriculum between Indonesia and Malaysia. Indonesia University of Education, University Kebangsaan Malaysia dan Universiti Malaya: Bandung.
R. Musthapa. (2013). Sejarah Pendidikan kejuruan di Nusantara: Pembangunan Identiti Negara-Bangsa serta Modal Insan di Malaysia dan Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Sejarah & Pendidikan Sejarah, 1, 1, Maret 2013.
R. Mustapha, S. Vengidason, N. Azlina Hasbullah, R. A. Bahtiar & R. C. Rus. (2015). Reka Bentuk Penyelidikan. Dalam M. Nor Azhari Azman, Ramlee Mustapha. Pendidikan Teknikal &Vokasional: Pendekatan Penyelidikan, Analisis & Interpretasi.(). Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 40-86.
Sugiyono. (2013). Upaya peningkatan Ketrampilan Pelajar membuat Ukiran Kayu pada Kelas X semester 2 SMK Negeri $ Lhokseumawe. Dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Yusuf Benseh. Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe: Indonesia
S. Atiqah B. Sharudin. (2008). Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberkesanan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran di Dalam Bengkel Vokasional di Dua Buah Sekolah Menengah Teknik di Negeri Sembilan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda.
S.Billet. (2009). Vocational Education: Purposes, Tradition, and Prospect. Griffith University, Australia: Springer.
S. S.Mok. (2000). Pendidikan di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur. Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd.
S. S. Mok. (2002). Pedagogi untuk Kursus Diploma Perguruan Semester 3. Subang Jaya: Kumpulan Budiman Sdn Bhd.
Technology Unit, Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training. (2003). Dalam http://www.curriculumsupport.nsw.edu.au/technology.
Undang-Undang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional Nombor 20 tahun 2003.
Z. Talib (2004). “Tinjauan Kesedaran Keselamatan Bengkel Di Kalangan Pelajar-pelajar Tahun 4 Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional di Bengkel Fabrikasi Logam N30 Fakulti Pendidikanâ€. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana Muda.
