Latihan Staf Dalam Pelaksanaan Mata Pelajaran Teknologi Kejuruteraan, Lukisan Kejuruteraan dan Reka Cipta Di Sekolah Menengah Harian

Authors

  • Mohd Tafizam Mohd Taib Fakulti Teknikal dan Vokasional, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjung Malim, Malaysia
  • Ramlee Mustapha Fakulti Teknikal dan Vokasional, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjung Malim, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v10n3-3.1517

Keywords:

Technical subjects, staff training, CIPP model, national schools, Malaysia

Abstract

Since 1996, the technical subjects comprised of Engineering Technology (TK), Engineering Drawing (LK) and Inventions (RC) have been introduced as elective subjects for Form 4 and Form 5 students.  Examination results for TK, LK and RC from 2006 to 2010 in the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) Examination were less encouraging and shows some declination of students performance.  Data from the Ministry of Education also show a decline in students’ enrolment in TK, LK and RC between 10 to 17 percent from 2009 to 2011.  Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate on the implementation of TK, LK and RC in the input, process and product dimensions. A CIPP model was used as a conceptual framework for the study. Research design used in this study was programme evaluation. Stratified random sampling was used to select 712 respondents from national secondary schools in Peninsular Malaysia consisted of 159 administrators, 176 teachers and 377 students. Questionnaires, interview protocols and observation checklists were used as instruments in this study. Cronbach Alpha reliability index for the three sets of questionnaires were between 0.77 to 0.95. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the data. The empirical data of the study found that staff training aspects need to be improved, especially staff training organized by the Ministry of Education and the Department of Education in terms of knowledge and skills of teachers for all three subjects.Interview and observation data were also presented to support the quantitative findings. Implications and recommendations for teaching and learning as well as for future research are presented and discussed.

References

Aitken, J.E. (2000). In-service training for teachers in New Zealand schools, what’s New Publications. North American Association of Educational Negotiators (NEAN) 15(1), 3-5.

Alias Mat Saad, Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik Yusoff, Ruhizan Mohammad Yassin. (2011). Penilaian Kemudahan Pembelajaran, Perntukan Kewangan dan Kursus dalam Perkhidmatan bagi Kursus Pendidikan Islam di Politeknik Malaysia. Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education, 3(1), 123-134.

Ann Lewis. (2007). Propective teachers of secondary school learner. Learning to teach – Teaching to learn? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 1- 9.

Asnul Dahar Minghat, Ruhizan M., Kamalularifin Subari, Muhammad Khair Noordin. (2013). Strategi Kelasterian Pembangunan Pendidikan Teknikal dan Vokasional (PTV). Prosiding 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 7-10 October.

Azizi Yahaya & Roslan Awang Mohammad. (2000). Penilaian terhadap keberkesanan program lukisan kejuruteraan dari aspek pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Seminar Pendidikan Kebangsaan. Anjuran Maktab Perguruan Kota Bahru, Kota Bahru, 14-15 Ogos.

Billett, S. (2011). Vocational education: Purposes, Traditions And Prospects. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

Campbell, A., McNamara, O., Gilroy, D.P. (2004). Practitioner Research and Professional Development in Education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

Cascio, C.F. (1995). Pengurusan sumber manusia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Denson, C. D., Kelley, T. R., & Wicklein, R. C. (2016). Integrating Engineering Design Into Technology Education: Georgia's Perspective. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 46(1), 7. Retrieved on November 16, 2016, from http://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/jste/vol46/iss1/7

Finch, C.R. & Crunkilton, J.R. (2005). Curriculum Development In Vocational and Technical Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Frank & Miles. (2008). Student-Centred Leadership. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

Fullan, M. (Eds). (2014). Teacher development and educational change. London: Routledge.

Garmston, R. (1991). Staff development as social architects: Educational leadership. Journal of the Association For Supervision And Curriculum Development, 6(2), 7-11.

Gay, L.R. & Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for Analysis And Application. New Jersey: Prantice-Hall Inc.

Husin Mohd Yusof. (2006). Penilaian terhadap perancangan dan pelaksanaan program pembelajaran konteksual di Sekolah-sekolah Menengah Teknik di Malaysia. Tesis Dr. Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Jabatan Perdana Menteri. (2015). Rancangan Malaysia ke-11 2015-2020, Putrajaya: Unit Perancangan Ekonomi, Jabatan Perdana Menteri.

Jamil Ahmad. (2002). Pemupukan budaya penyelidikan di kalangan guru di sekolah: Satu penilaian. Tesis Dr. Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Kang, M., Heo, H., Jo I. H., Shin, J. & Seo, J. (2010). Developing Educational Performance Indicator for New Millennium Learners. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 157-170.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2006). Laporan Tahunan. Kuala Lumpur.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2007). Laporan Tahunan. Kuala Lumpur.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2008). Laporan Tahunan. Kuala Lumpur.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2009). Laporan Tahunan. Kuala Lumpur.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2010). Laporan Tahunan. Kuala Lumpur.

Klaus, S. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. England: Penguin Book Ltd.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.

Lauglo, J., & Maclean, R. (2005). Vocationalisation of Secondary Education Revisited , 1. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

Luck, L. T., & Peng, C. F. (2010). Maximizing the Usage of Technology-Enhanced Teaching and Learning of Science and Mathematics in English Program in the Malaysian Secondary Schools System. Online Submission, 7(10), 87-97.

Mardevan . M. (1990). Kajian Keberkesanan Kursus Dalam Perkhidmatan Untuk Guru-Guru Mata Pelajaran Kemahiran Hidup. Tesis Sarjana yang Tidak Diterbitkan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Mohammed Sani Ibrahim. (1992). Satu Penilaian Terhadap Pendidikan Guru Dalam Perkhidmatan Di Malaysia Dan Implikasinya Untuk Masa Depan. Tesis Dr. Falsafah yang Tidak Diterbitkan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Newman, W.L. (2002). Social Research Methods: Qualitative And Quantitative Approaches. Edisi ke-4. New York: Alyn and Bacon.

Nik Azis Nik Pa dan Noraini Idris. (2008). Perjuangan Memperkasakan Pendidikan Di Malaysia: Pengalaman 50 Tahun Merdeka. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distribution Sdn Bhd.

Noor Akmar Hj. Jais. (2006). Ciri-Ciri Guru Berkesan Dan Faktor Motivasi Dari Persepsi Pentadbir Sekolah Dan Guru. Tesis Sarjana Yang Tidak Diterbitkan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.

Nordin Abu Bakar. (2011). Penilaian Program Mata Pelajaran Vokasional Bagi Bidang Pertanian Di Sekolah Menengah Harian. Tesis Dr. Falsafah yang Tidak Diterbitkan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Oakland, J.S. (1996). Pengurusan Kualiti Menyeluruh. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Ornstein, A.C. & Hunkins, F.P. (2017). Curriculum, Principles And Issues. Seventh Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Paris, S.G. & Winograd, P. (1995). Contextual Teaching: Principles And Practices For Teacher Preparation. Paper for the U.S. Department of Education Project.

Posavac, E. (2015). Program Evaluation: Methods And Case Studies 8th edition. New York: Routledge.

Pratt, D. (1980). Curriculum Design And Development. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.

Pratt, D. (1994). Curriculum Planning: A handbook for Professionals. New York: Harcourt.

Ramlee Mustapha, Ruhizan Mohd Yasin & Hamdan Mohd. Ali (2003).Integrasi Akademik dan Vokasional: Rasional dan Cabaran. Jurnal Pendidikan, 28(1), 77-90.

Ramlee Mustapha. (1999). The Role Of Vocational And Technical Education In The Industrialization Of Malaysia As Perceived By Educators And Employers. Tesis Dr. Falsafah. Universiti Purdue. Indiana.

Rashidah Ahmad Dahari. (2001). Pelaksanaan Sistem Penilaian Mata Pelajaran Reka Cipta Di Sekolah-Sekolah Menengah Negeri Johor. Tesis Sarjana Yang Tidak Diterbitkan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Ruhizan M. Yasin. Ramlee Mustapha. Asnul Dahar Minghat, Kamaruzaman Jusoff, Azaman Ishar dan Shafie Shamsudin. (2012). Pelaksanaan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Lukisan Kejuruteraan di Sekolah Menengah. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 27, 23-26.

Stufflebeam, D.L, Foley, W.J., Gephart, W.J., Guba, E.G., Hammond, R.L., Merriman, H.O. & Provus, M.M. (1971). Educational Evaluation And Decision Making. Itasca: F.E. Peacock.

UNESCO. (2015). Recommendation Concerning Technical And Vocational Education And Training (TVET).The General Conference of the United Nations, Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), meeting in Paris from 3 to 18 November 2015, at its 38th session. Retrieved on July 27, 2016. From http://www.unesdoc.unesco.org/images/002451/245118m.pdf

UNESCO. (2016). UNESCO TVET Strategy 2016-2021. Report of the UNESCO-UNEVOC Virtual Conference, 28 September to 03 October 2015. Bonn, Germany. Retrieved on July 30, 2016, from http://www.unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002451/245196e.pdf

UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2013). Revisiting Global Trends In TVET: Reflections On Theory And Practice. Bonn, Germany.

Zahba Md. Salim. (1999). Latihan dalam Perkhidmatan Ke Arah Kejayaan Sekolah Berkesan. Tesis Sarjana Yang Tidak Diterbitkan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-22

How to Cite

Mohd Taib, M. T., & Mustapha, R. (2018). Latihan Staf Dalam Pelaksanaan Mata Pelajaran Teknologi Kejuruteraan, Lukisan Kejuruteraan dan Reka Cipta Di Sekolah Menengah Harian. Sains Humanika, 10(3-3). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v10n3-3.1517