Keberkesanan ABM Pasang Bongkar Rak Alat Tulis dalam Merangsang Psikomotor Murid Bermasalah Pembelajaran Tahap 3 dan 4
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v10n3-3.1521Keywords:
Teaching aid, vocational education, adolescent, learning disabilities, manipulationAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of teaching aids (ABM) ‘Pasang Bongkar Rak Alat Tulis’ in stimulating the psychomotor of slow-learning students level 3 and level 4.This ABM is built to help the teaching and learning process (PdP) students with special needs in Manipulative Skills subjects especially for slow learner in raising student psychomotor stimulate. Qualitative approaches were used to obtain the study data through two instruments: observation and interview. The data collection process involves 16 students level 3 and level 4 for the special education stream as a sample to obtain data through observation, three (3) respondents with knowledge and expertise related to the Manipulative Skill subjects for the interview sessions. Data were analysed using content analysis method. The findings show that the ABM ‘Pasang Bongkar Rak Alat Tulis’ will help students with learning disabilities in Teaching and Learning Facilitation (PdPc) in the classroom. This can be proved by the students excitedly and more eager to include the components of the stationery rack back to the original shape. This can stimulate psychomotor students learning problem. Indirectly can stimulate student's cognitive (thinking) and affective (attitude and values) to think how ABM can be reentered correctly. The conclusions from this study suggest that ABM can help to increase student psychomotor stimulation by installing and unloading methods practiced in this ABM. The implication of the study shows that the use of ABM ‘Pasang Bongkar Rak Alat Tulis’ is able to increase interest in PdP in the classroom and enhance the psychomotor capabilities of slow learner students.
References
Abd. Rahim Hamdan & Hayazi M. Y. (2010). Penggunaan Alat Bantu Mengajar (ABM) Di Kalangan Guru-Guru Teknikal Di Sekolah Menengah Teknik Daerah Johor Bahru, Johor. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Abd. Rahman & Husin (1995). Media Teknologi Dan Pendidikan. Jurnal Guru, Feb(10), 11-18
Anizam, M.Y., Manisah M.A. & Amla, M. S. (2013). Pendidikan Vokasional Pelajar Berkeperluan Khas Kearah Memenuhi Pasaran Pekerjaan. Proceeding Of The International Conference On Social Science Research, ICSSR 2013. 4-5 June 2013, Penang, Malaysia. e-ISBN 978-11768-1-8.
Dale., E. (1969). Audiovisual Methods In Teaching, Third Edition. New York: The Dryden Press; Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Habibah, A. & Rahil, M. (2002). Psikologi Pembelajaran, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2016). Data Pendidikan Khas 2016. Bahagian Pendidikan Khas, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Lokman, T. & Nurul, Q. M. (2009). Pendidikan Teknik Dan Vokasional Untuk Pelajar Berkeperluan Khas. Jurnal Pendidikan dan
Pendidikan, Jil. 24, 73-87.
Lokman, T. & Nurul, Q .M (2010). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keberkesanan Pendidikan Khas Teknik Dan Vokasional Untuk Golongan Orang Kurang Upaya Di Tiga Buah Politeknik. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
M. Yaumi. (2013). Prinsip-Prinsip Desain Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana. hlm. 88.
Musa, N. E & Mohamad, M.H., (2014). Keberkesanan Penggunaan Alat Bahan Bantu Mengajar Dalam Pelaksanaan Kursus Sains Kejuruteraan di Kalangan Pelajar Diploma Kejuruteraan Di Politeknik Tuanku Sulatanah Bahiyah. Prosiding PTBS. Politeknik Tuanku Sulatanah Bahiyah.
Al Mahdin, N. (2008). Keberkesanan Penggunaan Alat Bantu Mengajar Berbantukan Komputer Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Subjek Kemahiran Hidup (KH) Di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Agama Kedah, Alor Star, Kedah. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Musa, N.E. &Mohamad, M.H. (2014). Keberkesanan Penggunaan Alat Bahan Bantu Mengajar Dalam Pelaksanaan Kursus Sains Kejuruteraan di Kalangan Pelajar Diploma Kejuruteraan di Politeknik Tuanku Sultanah Bahiyah. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Nasir, N., Adam, S.B., Rosli, N.N., Abdullah, M.A., Azman, M.N.A. (2017). Kompetensi Pembimbing dalam Sistem Latihan Kemahiran Dua Hala: Satu Sorotan Literatur. Sains Humanika, 9(1-5), 59-66.
Piek, J.P., Baynam, G.B., dan Barrett, N.C. (2006). The Relationship Between Fine And Gross Motor Ability, Self-perceptions And Self-worth In Children And Adolescents. Journal of Human Movement and Science, 25, 65-75.
Rudin, S. (1994). “Alat Bantuan Mengajar Ringkas, Rasional, Penggunaan dan Pembinaanâ€. Mahelah.
Schmidt, R. A. (1982). Motor Control And Learning: A Behavioural Emphasis. Human Kinetics, Champaign.
Siti Farhana, M. R. & Mahaliza, M. (2014). Roda C.I.U: Satu Teknik Untuk Membina Kemahiran Mengecam Dan Meningati Symbol Nombor Bulat 1 Hingga 9 Bagi Murid Lembam. Asian Education Action Research Journal (AEARI), ISSN 2289-3180/VOL.3/2014.
Sofi, N., Rohana, H. & Amirmudin, U. (2010). Falsafah Pendidikan Kebangsaan Memperkasakan Peranan Pendidikan Teknik Vokasional Dan Pendidikan Khas.Edupress. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Walls, R.T., & Fuiimer, S.L. (1997). Competitive employment, occupations after vocational rehabilitations. Journal of the American Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 41(1), 15-25
Yulinda, E. S. (2010). Kesulitan Belajar. Magistra 73 Th. XXII September 2010, 33-47.
