Kajian Empirikal Mengenai Kepintaran Vokasional Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Teknik

Authors

  • Ramlee Mustapha Fakulti Teknikal dan Vokasional, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjung Malim, Malaysia
  • Wahyudi Wahyudi Fakulti Teknikal dan Vokasional, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjung Malim, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v10n3-3.1522

Keywords:

Vocational intelligence, RIASEC, TVET, technical secondary schools, Malaysia

Abstract

Review of literature shows that empirical research on vocational intelligence (VQ) is lacking as compared to substantial research conducted on intellectual intelligence (IQ and emotional intelligence (EQ).  Vocational intelligence is a new theory. It could be an offshoot from Howard Gardner’s multiple intelligence theory.  The main objective of this investigation was to determine the vocational intelligence of technical school apprentices in the state of Perak, Malaysia. Gardner and Holland theories have been chosen as the basis for the study’s conceptual framework that contained six domains of vocational intelligence, namely realistic and artistic intelligence, artistic and realistic tendencies, and kinesthetic and visual talents. Multiple cases and multiple sites case study was selected as the study’s research design. A random sample of 306 vocational students was selected from four technical secondary institutions in Perak. Research instrument comprised questionnaire and interview questions to gather quantitative and qualitative information. Key finding from the questionnaire is that the technical secondary students believe that they possess the three main competencies ─ visual, kinesthetic, and artistic. The result also shows that background aspects of the students did not influence their VQ except the schoolings of the father and mother.  In terms of the relationships among constructs, Pearson correlation coefficients show strong correlations among artistic competence with artistic tendency and realistic competence with realistic tendency. In contrast to questionnaire data, open-ended results show the technical school students believed that they are dominantly realistic, followed by artistic and visual. Interview data via thematic analyses show that students admitted that they have realistic VQ.

References

Abdul Ghani Abdullah. (2009). Kepimpinan dan Penambahbaikan Sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.

Armstrong, T. (1993). Seven Kinds Of Smart: Identifying And Developing Your Intelligences. New York: Penguin Group.

Armstrong, T. (1996). Multiple Intelligences In The Classroom. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Asnul Dahar Minghat & Rabiah Sikh Mohamad. (2010). Kesediaan Pelajar Dalam Mengikuti Mata Pelajaran Vokasional Di Sekolah Menengah Harian Luar Bandar Daerah Jerantut, Pahang. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,.1-19. http://eprints.utm.my/10292/

Binet, A. (1905). The Development Of Intelligence In Children. Vineland, NJ: Publications of the Training School at Vineland. http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Binet/intro.htm. Access date: 11 Januari 2018

Blum, M.L. & Balinsky, B. (1983). Counseling and Psychology. New York: Prentice Hall Inc.

Campbell, L., Campbell, B., & Dickinson, D. (1996). Teaching and Learning Through Multiple Intelligences. London: Allyn & Bacon.

Carver, S.C. & Scheier, F.M. (2004). Perspectives on Personality (5th Ed). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

DeGraff, J. & Lawrence, K.A. (2002). Creativity at Work: Developing The Right Practices To Make Innovation Happen. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Fancher, R.E. (1985). The Intelligence Men: Makers of the IQ controversy. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Minds. The Theory Of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Ginzberg, E., Ginsburg, S., Aexlrad, S., & Herma, J.L. (1951). Occupational Choice: An Approach To A General Theory. New York: Colombia University Press.

Good, C.V. (1983). Dictionary of Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Henderson, R. & Robertson, M. (1999). Who Wants To Be An Entrepreneur? Young Adult Attitudes To Entrepreneurship As A Career. Education & Training, 41(5), 236-245.

Holland, J.L. (1973). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory Of Career. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Holland, J.L. (1985). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory Of Vocational Personalities And Work Environments (2nd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Holland, J.L. (1997). Making Vocational Choices. A Theory Of Vocational Personalities And Work Environments. (3rdEd.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Irmayanti Ishak. (2008). Kesediaan Pelajar Dalam Pelaksanaan Amali Kejuruteraan Awam Di Politeknik. (Tesis Master). Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, Johor.

Jasmine, J. (1996). Teaching with Multiple Intelligence Activities. Huntington Beach: Teacher Created Material, Inc.

Kementerian Sumber Manusia (2001). Laporan Pasaran Buruh Tahun 2000. Jabatan Tenaga Rakyat. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Berhad.

Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size For Research Education And Psychological Measurement. Education and Psychological Measurement, 30 (3), 607-610.

Lazear. D. (1991). Seven Ways Of Teaching: The Artistry Of Teaching With Multiple Intelligence. Palatine, IL: IRI Skylight Publishing Inc.

Long, A. (1982). Pedagogi: Kaedah Am Mengajar. Petaling Jaya: Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd.

Mazlina Mazlan. (2010). Aplikasi Kaedah Pengajaran Kepintaran Pelbagai Dalam Tatabahasa Bahasa Inggeris. (Projek Sarjana Pendidikan). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor.

Mills, A.J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. Thousands Oaks: Sage

Mohd Majid Konting. (2000). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Mohd Najib Abdul Ghaffar. (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai, Johor Bahru: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Muhamad Abdillah Royo & Haleefa Mahmood. (2011). Faktor-Faktor Kelemahan Yang Mempengaruhi Pencapaian Cemerlang Dalam Mata Pelajaran Reka Cipta. Journal of Educational Psychology and Counseling, 2(6), 145-174.

Muradriani, V., Widiastuti, N., Lianawati, & Nisfianoor. (2006). Hubungan Antara Visual Imagery Dengan Kreativitas Pada Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar (Studi Pada Siswa kelas 5 Sekolah Dasar Islam)

Mustor Abdul Hakim. (2006). Pendidikan selepas SPM. Bentong Pahang, Malaysia: PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.

Nachiappan, S., Ramlah Jantan, & Abdul Aziz Abdul Shukor. (2008). Psikologi pendidikan. Shah Alam, Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd.

Noor Azlan Ahmad Zanzali & Noridah Rahmat. (2010). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pemilihan Kerjaya Perguruan Di Kalangan Pelajar-Pelajar Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 1-9. http://eprints.utm.my/11509/

Pal, H.R., Pal, A., & Tourani, P. (2004). Theories of Intelligence. Everyman’s Science, 39(3), 181-192.

Ramlee Mustapha (2013). Transforming education toward K-Economy in Malaysia. International Journal for Educational Studies, 1(16), 1-15.

Ramlee Mustapha (2017). Skills Training And Vocational Education in Malaysia. In M. Samuel, M.Y. Tee, & L. Pe Symaco (Eds), Education in Malaysia. Singapore: Springer.

Ramlee Mustapha & Norani Mohd Salleh (2007). Self-Fulfilling Prophecy And Digital Divide Revisited: Vocational and IT Competencies Of Students With Special Needs in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Social Work, 6(1), 33-65.

Reinhartz, J. & Beach, D.M. (1998). Teaching and Learning In The Elementary School: Focus On Curriculum. New Jersey: Merrill.

Renzulli, J.S. & Reis, S.M. (1990). Gifted Programs As Vehicles For School Wide Change. Communicator: The Journal of the California Association for the Gifted, 20, 29-30.

Rogahang, S.D. (2011). Kemantangan vokasional siswa SMK negeri 2 Manado. Jurnal Elektromanika, 1(1), 1-11.

Rogers, D. (1981). Adolescents and Youth. United States of American: Prentice-Hall, Inc: Englewood Clifts.

Savickas, M.L. & Taber, B.J. (2006). Individual Differences In RIASEC Profile Similarity Across Five Interest Inventories. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 38(4), 203-210.

Sidek Mohd Noah. (2002). Perkembangan Kerjaya: Teori Dan Praktis. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Siti Rahayah Ariffin, Roseni Arifin, & Hafsan Mohamed Makki. (2008). Contributing Factors In Multiple Intelligence Among Adolescent Students. Journal of Education, 32 (1), 35-46.

Siti Fatimah Hussin. (2002). Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Reka Cipta Di Sekolah-Sekolah Menengah di Negeri Kelantan. (Tesis Sarjana Muda). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor.

Sternberg, R.J. (1997). Thinking style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Strong, S. & Smith, R. (2002). Spatial Visualization: Fundamentals And Trends In Engineering Graphics. Journal of Industrial Technology, 18(1), 1-6.

Suradi Salim. (1996). Bimbingan dan Kaunseling. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors.

Vaughan, T.D. (1970). Educational and Vocational Guidance Today. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Wechsler, D. (1958). The Measurement And Appraisal Of Adult Intelligence. (4th Ed). Baltimore, MD: The Williams & Wilkins Company.

Wiles, J. & Bondi, J. (1998). Curriculum Development: A Guide To Practice (5th Ed). New Jersey: Merrill.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-22

How to Cite

Mustapha, R., & Wahyudi, W. (2018). Kajian Empirikal Mengenai Kepintaran Vokasional Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Teknik. Sains Humanika, 10(3-3). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v10n3-3.1522