Inventory of Constructive Alignment Evaluation (ICAE) In Teacher Education Institute: A Literature / Inventori Penilaian Penjajaran Konstruktif (IPPK) Di Institut Pendidikan Guru: Satu Analisis Literatur

Authors

  • Md Daud Md Jani Sekolah Pendidikan, Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Adibah Abdul Latif Sekolah Pendidikan, Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Rohaya Talib Latif Sekolah Pendidikan, Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v12n2-2.1787

Keywords:

Constructive alignment, outcome based education, teachers education institutes, constructive activity.

Abstract

This study was conducted for the purpose of developing an inventory which assess the implementation of constructive alignment in the teaching and learning system at the Teacher Education Institute (TEI). In this literature analysis, several concepts related to learning outcomes, teaching activities and assessment were discussed. This literature analysis also described in detail the concept of constructive alignment based on few theories and models. Besides, it was also supported by previous studies, assignments and assessments, syllabus, number of hours of student learning, factors that influenced the implementation of constructive alignment, assessment concepts, reliability, the validity and theory of measurement used as a guide and reference in the study. The development of the inventory was carried out in accordance with a basic procedure that involved 11 steps and it was divided into 3 stages, namely the actual stage of inventory development, validation and actual study. During the development stage of the inventory, the researcher divided it into 4 steps: conducting literature review, interviewing expert panels, conducting meta-analysis and producing items. Meanwhile, during the inventory validation stage, the researcher divided it into 5 steps: expert panel judgment, item review, pilot study, data analysis (reliability and validity) and final step of item review and final formatting. Then, at the actual study stage, 2 steps have been identified by conducting research on selected TEIs and analysing the data. This inventory will be used to build a profile of knowledge and practice of constructive alignment among lecturers of Teacher Education Institutes as well as a source of reference in strengthening the assessment system and teaching activities at the TEI in order to maintain the MQA Malaysian accreditation standards that require the assessment system to be based on learning outcomes (Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA), 2010). In addition, it is also a source of information for TEI in building the inventory to enhance the level of implementation of constructive alignment. Thus, it will help TEI in grasping the inspiration of the first shift of Malaysia Education Blueprint or PPPM in producing holistic, entrepreneur and balanced graduates.

References

Adi Badiozaman Tuah. (2007). A Proposal Towards A More Holistic Education Assessment System in Malaysia. International Forum on Educational Assessment System. 7-9 May, 2007.Sunway Resort Hotel & Spa, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.

Adibah Binti Abdul Latif. (2013). Pembangunan Instrumen Penilaian Akhlak Pelajar Di Institut Pengajian Tinggi Awam. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Agensi Kelayakan Malaysia (MQA). (2010). Kod Amalan Akreditasi Program. Retrieved from www.mqa.gov.my Access date: 20 November 2019

Alkharusi, H. (2011). Development and datametric properties of a scale measuring students’ perceptions of the classroom assessment environment. International Journal of Instruction, 4(1), 105–120.

Amin, A. M. (2012). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Konstruktivisme Berdasar Teori Sosial Vygotsky di Sekolah Menengah Atas Biology-Based Learning Software Development Based on the Theory of Social Constructivism Vygotsky in High School, I(2), 109–124.

Amirruddin Abdul Kadir, Mohd Zuki Salleh, Mohammad Alinor Abdul Kadir, & Khairul Anuar Mohd.Ali. (2009). Menilai Perhubungan Di Antara Hasil Pembelajaran Kursus (Hpk) Dan Hasil Pembelajaran Program (Hpp) Dari Persepsi Pelajar, 51, 1–16.

Anderson, L. w., Krathwol, D. R., AirasianI, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy Learning, Teaching and assessing. New York: David McKay Company Inc,

Bagban, T. I., Patil, S. R., Gat, A., & Shirgave, S. K. (2017). On Selection of Assessment Methods in Outcome Based Education (OBE). Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 30(3), 327–332.

Barrie S. (2007). A Conceptual Framework For The Teaching and Learning of Generic Graduate Attributes. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 439-58.

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871

Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching For Quality Learning at University. (Buckingham : Open University, Ed.) (2nd ed.). Press/Society For Research Into Higher Education.

Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. S. (2011). Teaching For Quality Learning At University. Teaching For Quality Learning At University. (4th ed.). Two Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10121-2289, USA First. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2007.09.003

Biggs, J., Medland, E., & Vardi, I. (2003). Aligning teaching and assessing to course objectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.670197

Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box : Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan October, 139-148. Falmer Press, London

Bond, T. ., & Fox, C. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in The Human Sciences. Mahwa, NewJersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brown, F. G. (1983). Principles of Educational and Psychological Testing. (3rd ed.). New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

Brown, T., Bourke-Taylor, H., & Williams, B. (2012). Curriculum alignment and graduate attributes: Critical elements in occupational therapy education. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(4), 163. https://doi.org/10.4276/030802212X13336366278013

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The Zone of Proximal Development in Vygotsky’s Analysis of Learning and Instruction. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. & Miller, S. (Eds.). Vygotsky’s Educational Theory and Practice in Cultural Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan Statitik Penyelidikan: Kaedah Penyelidikan (1st ed.). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill.

Clark, T. (2017). “ I †m not a natural mathematician ’: Inquiry- Based Learning , Constructive Alignment And Introductory Quantitative Social Science. 35, 260-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739417711219

Cohen, R. ., & Swedlik, M. . (2002). Psychological Testing and Measurement: an Introduction to Test and Measurement. (5th ed.). New York : McGraw Hill.

Cole, M. (1997). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.

D. Wright, B., & N.Master, G. (1982). Rating Scale Analysis. Chicago: Mesa Press.

de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. The Guilford Press. 1. The Guilford Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703993104

Dodeen, H., & Johanson, G. (2001). The Prevalence of Gender DIF in Survey Data. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Seattle, WA, April 10-14, 2001), 12.

Dunkin, M., & Precians, R. (1992). Award-Winning University Teachers’ Concepts of Teaching. Higher Education, 24, 483–502.

Eggenberger, C., Rinawi, M., & Backes-Gellner, U. (2018). Occupational specificity: A new measurement based on training curricula and its effect on labor market outcomes. Labour Economics, 51(July 2016), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2017.11.010

Elkonin, D. (1998). Epilogue. The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. 5. Child Psychology. R.W. Rieber (Ed.). With a prologue by C. Ratner. New York: Plenum.

Gallagher, G. (2017). Aligning for Learning: Including Feedback in the Constructive Alignment Model *. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 3011–30112. Retrieved from http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/301

Gallagher, J. D. (1998). Classroom Assessment for Teacher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merill/Prentice Hall.

Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational Research (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Gronlund, N. E. (1976). Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

Gronlund, N. E., Linn, R. L., & Miller, M. D. (2009). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching. (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River : New Jersey: Pearson education Inc.

Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding Internal Consistency Reliability Estimates : A Conceptual Primer on Coefficient Alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Measurement. 34, 177-189.

Indrawati S. (2010). Peningkatan Kemampuan Bernalar Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme. Jurnal Pembangunan, 5(2), 109-124

Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia. (2017). Buku Panduan Akademik Program Ijazah Sarjana Muda Perguruan. Cyberjaya: KPM.

JM Linacre. (2007). Winsteps Rasch Measurement (Version 3.64. 2). MESA Press, Chicago

JM Linacre. (2010). Rasch Measurement Transactions. MESA Press, Chicago

John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural Approaches to Learning and Development: A Vygotskian Framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 191–206.

Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2005). Psychological Testing : Principles, Applications and Issues (6th ed.). Belmont CA : Thomson Wadsworth.

Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. (2006). ModulL Pembangunan Kemahiran Insaniah (SOFT SKILLS) Untuk Institut Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. UPM.

Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000a). Foundations of Behavioral Research (4th ed.). United States of America: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.

Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000b). Foundations of Behavioral Research (4th ed.). United States: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.

Kline. T. (2005). Psychological Testing : A Practical Approach to Design and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2000). Use These Notes and the Other Reference Info. New York Longman, Complete, E(4), 302. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Kubiszyan, T., & Borich, G. (2003). Educational Testing And Measurement Classroom Application And Practice (7th ed.). United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (2007). Educational Testing and Measurement (8th ed.). Hoboken. Wiley, United States of America

Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (2013). Educational Testing and Measurement : Classroom Application And Practise. (10, Ed.). United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Landis, J., & Kosh, G. G. (1977). Thr measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.

Lantolf, J. P. (2004). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Acquisition. In R. B. Kaplan (ed.)., The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics, 104-114. OUP.

Leber, J., Renkl, A., Nückles, M., Wäschle, K., Leber, J., Renkl, A., Wäschle, K. (2017). When The Type Of Assessment Counteracts Teaching For Understanding. Learning: Research and Practice, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2017.1285422

Lilia binti Halim, & Sopia binti Md Yasin. (n.d.). Garis Panduan Penulisan Program Akademik. UTHM.

Linacre, J. M. (1999). Estimation Methods for Rasch Measures. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3, 382-405.

Linacre, J. M. (2005). Measurement, Meaning and Morality. Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS) & International Symposium On Measurement & Evaluation (ISME), 2005, (August), 1–8.

Linacre, J. M. (2011). A User’s guide to WINSTEP ministeps: Rasch-Model Computer Program. Program Manual 3,73 MESA Press, Chicago

Mamaril, M. N., Cox, L. J., & Vaughan, M. (2018). Weaving evaluation into the WaipÄ ecosystem: Placing evaluation in an indigenous place-based educational program. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56(October 2017), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.10.005

McBrien, J. ., & Brandt, R. . (1997). The Language of Learning: A Guide to Education Terms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA

McIntire, S. A., Miller, L. A., & Lovler, R. . (2013). Foundations of Psychological Testing (4th ed.). New York : McGraw Hill.: Sage Publications Inc.

Mertler, C. A., & Campbell, C. (2005). Measuring Teachers’ Knowledge & Application of Classroom Assessment Concepts: Development of the Assessment Literacy Inventory. American Educational Research Association, 27. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED490355.pdf

Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar. (2011). Pembinaan dan Analisis Ujian Bilik Darjah (2nd ed.). UTM Johor Bahru: Penerbit UTM Press.

Mohd Hazim Mokhtar. (2003). Pentaksiran Berasaskan Elemen : Perealisasian Pentaksiran Merujuk Kriteria. Seminar Pentaksiran Pendidikan Kebangsaan. 5-8 Mei, 2003. The Legend Hotel, Kuala Lumpur.

Mohemed Ayob Sukani. (2014). Instrumen Pentaksiran Kesediaan Murid Prasekolah (IPKP): Pembinaan dan Kesahan. UKM.

Moshman, D. (1982). Exogenous, endogenous, and dialectical constructivism. Developmental Review 2,371-384.

Nik Azis Nik Pa. (1999). Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Radikal Dalam Pendidikan Matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

Norhayati Zakaria, Mohd Zulfazli Raub Khan, & Mohd Aswad Othman. (2013). Tahap Implementasi Outcome Based Education Dalam Proses Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran di kalangan Pensyarah Politeknik, (Isqae), 359–364.

O‟Neill, G. (2010). Program design: Overview of Curriculum Models. Retrieved from www.ucd.ie/teaching. Access date : 25 November 2019

Payne, D. . (2003). Applied Educational Assessment (2nd ed.). Wadsworth group, USA.

Pellegrino, J. (2002). Understanding How Students Learn and Inferring What They Know: Implications For The Design of Curriculum, Instruction, And Assessment. Paper Presented at the Meeting of NSF Instructional Material and Development Conference. Washington DC.

Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. Oxford, England: Viking.

Popham, W. J. (1990). Modern Education Measurement: A Practitioner’s Perspective. (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Pusat Pembangunan Akademik IPGM. (2017). Buku Panduan Akademik Program Ijazah Sarjana Muda Perguruan Dengan Kepujian PISMP. Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia.

Redish, E. F. (2004). A Theoretical Framework for Physics Education Research: Modeling Student Thinking. The Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School in Physics, 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1509420

Rene Van Der Veer, & Jaan Valsiner. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky : A Quest For Synthesis. Cambridge, Massachusetts USA: Basil Blackwell, Inc.

Rohaya Talib. (2008). Pembinaan dan Pengesahan Instrumen Bagi Mengukur Tahap Literasi Pentaksiran Guru Sekolah Menengah di Malaysia. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Pasca Ijazah 2008, 25-27 November 2008, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia., 109–125.

Rusmawati binti Othman, Mohd Fadzil bin Mohd Salleh, & Mohd. Isha bin Awang. (2016). Pentaksiran Dalam Kelas Melalui Pendekatan Outcome Based Education ( OBE ): Satu Analisis Terhadap Pengetahuan Dan Amalan Pensyarah. Proceeding of ICECRS, 1(October), 59–68.

Santhanadass, A. R. A. (2015). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Instrumen Penilaian Pendidikan Luar. UPSI.

Santrock JW. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan (Terjemahan) Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Schafer, W. D. (1993). Assessment Literacy For Teachers. Theory Into Practice. 32(2), 118-126.

Shafini Binti Suhaimi. (2015). Pembinaan Instrumen Penilaian Amalan Pentaksiran Guru Matematik Sekolah Menengah. UPSI.

Shanteau, J., Wiess, D. J., Thomas, R. P., & Pounds, J. (2002). Performance Based Assessment of Expertise: How to Decide if Someone is an Expert or not. European Journal Of Operational Research, 136(2), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00113-8

Spady, W., & K. Marshall. (1991). Beyond Traditional Outcome-Based Educatione. Educational Leadership, 67–77.

Srinivasapai, P., Chiplunkar, N. N., & Shrinivasarao, B. R. (2018). Project based Learning ( PBL ): Issues faced by Faculty for its effective implementation, 31(3).

Stiggins, R. J. (1995). Assessment Literacy for the 21st Century. Phi Delta Kappan. 77 (3), 238-245.

Strack, S. (2002). Essentials of MillonTM Inventories Assessment, (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1999). Foundational Models for 21 st Century Program Evaluation by Foundational Models for 21 st Century Program Evaluation.

Sun, J. (2016). Multi-dimensional alignment between online instruction and course technology: A learner-centered perspective. Computers and Education, 101, 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.003

Suriyani Ariffin, Nor Aziah Alias, Khairil Iskandar Othman, & HaslindaYusoff. (2017). Exploring Students Self-evaluation of Their Learning Outcomes Attainment through an Integrated Cumulative Grade Point Average ( iCGPA ) Reporting Mechanism.

Susan, B. (2004). Self-Assessment Activities For School Administrators: A Companion To Making Technology Standards Work For You. ISTE Publication.

Taufek, M. (2016). Kebolehpasaran Graduan Perancangan Bandar Lepasan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Dalam Pasaran Kerja Di Malaysia. Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, (April).

Thomas, K. (2004). Learning Taxonomies In The Cognitive, Affective, And Psychomotor Domains. Rocky Mountain Alchemy.

Treleaven, L. (2008). Attributes Through Constructive Alignment. 30, 160-173. Sage Publications, Australia,

Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and Language (E. Hanf-mann & G. Vakar, Trans.). 200-254. Mit Press, Cambridge.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts USA: MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and Speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (eds.)., The collected works of L. S.

Walsh, A. (2007). An exploration of Biggs’ constructive alignment in the context of work-based learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(1), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600848309

Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. ., & Lenz, E. R. (2005). Measurement in Nursing and Health Research (3rd ed.). New York: Springer Publishing Co.

Wang, X., Su, Y., Cheung, S., Wong, E., & Kwong, T. (2012). An Exploration of Biggs’ Constructive Alignment in Course Design and its Impact On Students’ Learning Approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(4), 477-491. Doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.658018

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wertsch, J. V., & Tulviste, P. (1992). L. S. Vygotsky and Contemporary Developmental Psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 548-557. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wirkala, C., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Problem-Based Learning in K–12 Education: Is it Effective and How Does it Achieve its Effects?, 48(5), 1157–1186. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211419491

Yuzainee Md Yusoff, Norain Farhana Ahmad Fuad, Ruhizan bt Mohammad Yasin, & Norngainy Mohd Tawil. (2014). Achievement of the Program Outcomes in Outcomes Based Education Implementation - A Meta-Analysis. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, (2004), 1739–1749.

Zakiah Binti Nordin. (2016). Pembinaan dan Pengesahan Instrumen Literasi Pentaksiran Pelajar Ijazah Sarjana Muda Perguruan. UMS.

Zapko, K. A., Ferranto, M. L. G., Blasiman, R., & Shelestak, D. (2018). Evaluating best educational practices, student satisfaction, and self-confidence in simulation: A descriptive study. Nurse Education Today, 60(April 2017), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.006

Downloads

Published

2020-08-26

How to Cite

Md Jani, M. D., Abdul Latif, A., & Talib Latif, R. (2020). Inventory of Constructive Alignment Evaluation (ICAE) In Teacher Education Institute: A Literature / Inventori Penilaian Penjajaran Konstruktif (IPPK) Di Institut Pendidikan Guru: Satu Analisis Literatur. Sains Humanika, 12(2-2). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v12n2-2.1787