Dialog Peradaban dan Falsafah Pendidikan Islam: Implimentasi dalam Kurikulum dan Kokurikulum Subjek Umum Fakulti Tamadun Islam, UTM

Authors

  • Aminudin Hehsan Fakulti Tamadun Islam, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Zulkiflee Haron Fakulti Tamadun Islam, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohd. Nasir Ripin Fakulti Tamadun Islam, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Yusuf Abdul Azeez Fakulti Shariah, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, USIM, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
  • Shahrel Ahmad Shuhel Ahmad Centre of Research for Fiqh Science and Technology (CFiRST), 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v8n3-2.958

Keywords:

Dialogue of civilizations, philosophy of Islamic education

Abstract

Dialogue of civilizations is not a new term in the world of human civilization, but its application in human life begins simultaneously with human existence on this earth. It becomes one of the medium to apply the values of understanding and positive interaction between two way communications, sharing perspectives for solving problems in various aspects, tolerance, agreed cooperation, exchange opinions and ideas. As a result, it is able to bring to the circumstances where all parties can benefit or be identified as a win win situation. Besides, the Islamic education is the process of training and educating and molding the character and attitude of the human person. Aiming to foster the perfect personality in many aspects of life in physical, spiritual, mental, even moral social. It needs to be developed based on the values of Islamic and there needs to be alignment between the curriculums with the teachings of Islam itself. The result, then formed a curriculum that corresponds to human nature, corresponding to each age ratings and demands to give birth during the development of a brilliant public institutions. Thus, education and community issues are is implemented effectively, it can act as an agent to maintain and spread the culture according to the progress and development currency. In the context of public high school in teaching institutions the two elements that are very tightly linked and can't be separated and have the goal of the thorough and parallel to the global situation. If it as a reflection of Malaysian society, instead of them as heir to the country leaders and boosters advanced society. How would the situation prevailing polarization of the conflict and the silent various ethnic, tenuous relationship between religion and nation in the students who should be expected. One approach to dealing with conflict and polarization of people in the students, the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia has required students Public University (UA) and Private University (US) took the subject of Islamic Civilization and Asian Civilization, the State and the relationship ethnicity as a preparation towards society mutual respect between each other through the medium of education and dialogue between civilizations. One study analyzed the students' opinion about the teaching and learning of TITAS has been implemented in UTM. In addition, analyzing the results of the assessment based on the four elements TITAS, the group assignment (20%), presentation (10%), tests or quizzes (20%) and e-learning or generic skills (10%). The results are then analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 20.0 for Windows. The results and findings have clarified the mean (average) which is in the very high or very positive (> 4.00) in the analysis of teaching and learning styles findings and analysis of the findings of the assessment TITAS four elements TITAS. In conclusion, the elements of civilization that has been incorporated into every element in the implementation of the subject TITAS plays a very important role in fostering a tolerant attitude among the races in Malaysia.

References

Abbud, A.A. G. (1990). al Tarbiyyah al Islamiyyah wa al Tahaddiyat al Asr. al Qaherah, Dar al fikr al Arabi.

Ahmad, K. (1979 ). Prinsip-prinsip Pendidikan. Bumiprint, Kuala Lumpur.

Arifin, H. M. (1991). Filsafat Pendidikan Islam. Edisi-2.. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta

Basri, G. (1990). Christian Mission and Islamic Da’wah in Malaysia. Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.

Brubacher, J. S. (1969). Modern Philosophies of Education. Edisi-4. Graw-Hill Company, New York Mc.

Daia, M. (1974). Prinsip Am Pendidikan. Pustaka Aman Press, Kelantan.

Daradjat, Z. (1992). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Edisi-2. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and Education. The Free Press, New York.

Fadil, S. (2003). Perspektif Qur’ani: Siri Wacana Tematik. Tradisi Ilmu Sdn. Bhd, Kuala Lumpur.

Farhan, I. A. (1979). Nahw Siyaghah al Islamiyyah li Manahij al Tarbiyyah wa al Ta'lim. al Nadwah al IslÄmiyyah, Jordan.

Ghazali, A. H. M. b. M. a. (1939). Ihya' Ulum al din. Matba'ah Mustafa al Baby al Halaby, Misr.

Horne, H. H. (1962 ). An Idealistic Philosophy of Education. The Forty First, Yearbook of The National Society for The Study of Eduacation. Philosophies of Eduacatio. E1. The Univercity of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Ishak, A. A. (1995). Pendidikan Islam dan Pengaruhnya di Malaysia. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur.

Ishak, A. A. B. (1989). Sejarah Perkembangan Pelajaran dan Pendidikan Islam. Jiwamas Printers Sdn. Bhd, Selangor.

Iskandar, T. (2000). Kamus Dewan. Edisi-3. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur.

Jamali, M. F. A. (1972). Nahw al Tauhid al Fikr al Tarbawi fi al A'lam al Islami. Dar al Tunisiyyah, Tunisia.

Kamus Dewan (2005). Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur.

Kasa, A. A. R. A. D. Z. (1994). Falsafah dan Konsep Pendidikan. Edisi-2. Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd, Kuala Lumpur.

Khir, M. M. (2005). Sekolah Wawasan Sebagai Asas Dialog Peradaban dalam Seminar Kebangsaan Dialog Peradaban: Peranan dan Kepentingannya Di Malaysia Institut Perkembangan Minda ( INMIND), Petaling Jaya.

Kilpatrick, H. W. (1961). Philosophy of Education. Macmillan Company, New York.

Langgulung, H. (1979). Pendidikan Islan Suatu Analisa Sosio-psikologikal. Pustaka Antara, Kuala Lumpur.

Langgulung, H. (1986). Pengenalan Tamadun Islam dalam Pendidikan. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Selangor.

Ibn Manzur, A. A. F. M. M. I. (1955-1956). Lisan al Arab. Dar Sadir, Beirūt.

Mohammad Hamid al Efendi, T. t. N. M. I., Nahwu Manahij Islamiyyah, Majallah Kuliah al Tarbiyyah. JÄmicah al Riyadh, Riyadh.

Muhammady, A. A. H. E. (1991). Pendidikan Islam: Falsafah, disiplin dan Peranan Pendidik. Dewan Pustaka Islam, Selangor.

Muzaffar, C. (2003). Muslim, Dialogue, Terror. JUST, Petaling Jaya.

Nahlawi, A. a. R. a. (1979). Usul al Tarbiyyah al Islamiyyah wa Asalibuha fi al Bait wa al Madrasah wa al Mujtamak. DÄr al Fikr, Dimas.

Nocholls, A. (1972). Developing a Curriculum a Practical Guide. George Allen and Unwin (Publishers) Ltd, London.

Raziq, M. A. (1959). Tamhid li Tarikh al Falsafah al Islamiyyah. Lujnah al Ta’lif wa al Tarjamah wa al Nasyr, al Qaherah.

Sadiq, S. A. (1962). al Falsafah wa al Tarbiyyah. Dar Fikr, QÄherah.

Sayuti, R. (2004). Kajian Hubungan Kaum di Kalangan Pelajar Sekolah Pembangunan Sosial, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Paper presented at the Seminar Antarabangsa Pemantapan Nilai dalam Komuniti Pasca Modenisme, Langkawi Kedah.

Shaibani, U. M. A. (1975). Falsafah al Tarbiyyah al Islamiah. T.tp, Tripoli.

Shipley, J. T. (1957). Dictionary of World Origins. Ames Lowa, USA.

Sulaiman, S. T. (2004). Dialog Peradaban Agama di Malaysia; Praktik dan Kerelevenannya Hari Ini. Dalam Pemikir. Utusan Karya Sdn. Bhd, Kuala Lumpur.

Zuhairini. (1992). Filsafat Pendidikan Islam. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2016-08-14

How to Cite

Hehsan, A., Haron, Z., Ripin, M. N., Abdul Azeez, Y., & Shuhel Ahmad, S. A. (2016). Dialog Peradaban dan Falsafah Pendidikan Islam: Implimentasi dalam Kurikulum dan Kokurikulum Subjek Umum Fakulti Tamadun Islam, UTM. Sains Humanika, 8(3-2). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v8n3-2.958